只用一本书提高英语听力能力!重温经典名著双语阅读小编推荐:跟着纪录片学英语不背单词和语法,轻松学英语
返回列表 回复 发帖

[英伦广角] 【整理】Issue 104 英政府商业办公室新标志被恶搞

提高英语听力能力 找对方法很重要!

on axiuluo20055

 

Now the government spends 142,000,000 pounds a year on advertising and branding, on things like this, which is the new logo for the Office of Government Commerce. But is it money well spent? Some people have been seeing things in the design that the designers may not have intended. As Rags Martel reports.

 

Introducing the new logo for the Office of Government Commerce, but turn it on its side, and you just might see why this isn't the best thoughtout rebranding exercise, particularly considering it will be this way up when displayed untensed.

 

I must say the first time I saw it, I laughed out loudly. It’s very funny. I think the logo should probably be scrapped almost immediately, and I think that’s probably what the OGC are doing. I mean it's a bit of embarrassment, it's a funny episode. But that logo can never be taken seriously. If this is the corporate thoughts of the OGC, they are in trouble.

 

1400 pounds was spent on the logo, expensive, especially for a government agency which aims to improve value for money to the tax payer.

 

They are a bit embarrassed because when I turn it like that, what could you see?

 

Oh, not very good. That's not very good at all.

 

Cost 14 grand

 

Is this a joke?

 

No, it's not a joke.

 

I think that's a bit of a joke.

 

I think it is in color. It's just a logo.

 

Or, what if I turn it like this.

 

That looks like ha ha ha.

 

Almost obscene.

 

Now some people could say that they have dirty minds, because they are just seeing the naughty side of a logo. In fact, there’s something in the brain which is called the amidola that gives you an interpretation of something from your points of view or what it actually is. The fact is, in this case, you know, it is what it is. And what it looks like, what it rather sticks out like a soft fun and that being generous.

 

The OGC refused to comment on the logo, saying only that it had refocused its priorities for delivering high quality public services. But it can take some comfort that this isn't the first logo cock-up.

 

And even in the controversial London Olympic logo, apparently some people see Lisa Simpson doing something unspeakable with Bart. The moral of the logo story yet seems always look at it both ways.

 

Now, we do enjoy ourselves here. And if you didn't quite get that you can see it again on our website at the address on the scree...

on 春山如笑

 

Now the government spends 142,000,000 pounds a year on advertising and branding, on things like this, which is the new logo for the Office of Government Commerce. But is it money well spent? Some people have been seeing things in the design that the designers may not have intended. As Rags Martel reports.

 

Introducing the new logo for the Office of Government Commerce, but turn it on its side, and you just might see why this isn't the best thoughtout rebranding exercise, particularly considering it will be this way up when displayed on pens.

 

I must say the first time I saw it, I laughed out loud. It’s very funny. I think the logo should probably be scrapped almost immediately, and I think that’s probably what the OGC are doing. I mean it's a bit of embarrassment, it's a funny episode. But that logo can never be taken seriously. If this is the corporate thought,\ the OGC, they are in trouble.

 

1400 pounds was spent on the logo, expensive, especially for a government agency which aims to improve value for money to the tax payer.

 

They are a bit embarrassed because when I turn it like that, what could you see?

 

Oh, not very good. That's not very good at all.

 

Cost 14 grand

 

Is this a joke?

 

No, it's not a joke.

 

I think that's a bit of a joke.

 

I think it is in color. It's just a logo.

 

Or, what if I turn it like this.

 

That looks like ha ha ha.

 

Almost obscene.

 

Now some people could say that they have dirty minds, because they are just seeing the naughty side of a logo. In fact, there’s something in the brain which is called the amidola that gives you an interpretation of something from your points of view ,rather what it actually is. The fact is, in this case, you know, it is what it is. And what it looks like, what it rather sticks out like / sword fun and that being generous.

 

The OGC refused to comment on the logo, saying only that it had refocused its priorities for delivering high quality public services. But it can take some comfort that this isn't the first logo cock-up.

 

And even in the controversial London Olympic logo, apparently some people see Lisa Simpson doing something unspeakable with Bart. The moral of the logo story yet seems always look at it both ways.

 

Now, we do enjoy ourselves here. And if you didn't quite get that you can see it again on our website at the address on the screen...

立即获取| 免费注册领取外教体验课一节

Homework

 

Now the government spends 142 million pounds a year on adverstising and branding something like this, which is the new logo for the office of government commerce, is the money well spent? some people have been seeing things that the design and designers may not be attended as much as my peer report.

Introducing the new logo for the office of government commerce, but turn it on the side you just might see why this isn't the best sort out we branding exercise particularly considering it will be this way up when this is placed on pens.

I first saw on it, I laugned out loudly it's very funny, I think the logo should probably be scrapped, almost immediately, I think that's pretty much what OGC is doing. I mean it's a bit of embarrassement, it's funny *, But that logo can never be taken seriously. This is the *, also the OGC that in trouble.

40 thousands pounds were spent on the logo, expensive especially for a government agency which aims to improve the value for money to the taxpayer.

That's embarrass, because when I turning it like that. OGC.

Oh, not very good...that's not very good at all. Cost 40 grand.

No, it's not a joke.

I think it looks like a joke.

I think it would be the color. It's just a logo.

Oh, when I turn it like this.

that looks like..Almost off-see.

Now some people could say, they have dirty minds because they just see the naunty side of the logo. In fact, there's something in the brain which is called the meddler that give you an interpretation or something from your point of view to what actually is. The fact is, in this case, you know, it's what it's. What it looks like, rather fix out likes so fun, and that being ?.

The OGC refuses to comment on the logo, saying only that it had refocus its priority for delivering high quality public services. But it can take some comfort that this is not the first logo coco. And even in the controversial london Olympic logo, apparently some people see these are sympathin doing something on speakable with bars. The moral of the logo story seems always look it both ways.

Now we are doing it all ourselves here. maybe you don't quite get that, you can see it again on our website, I think it's just on the screen right now.

目标:BV issue 100篇!
101;102;105;104;108;111;112;110;114;115;
119;117;129;140;139;938;928;
实现无障碍英语沟通

Homework

 

Now the government spends 142 million pounds a year on adverstising and branding something like this, which is the new logo for the office of government commerce, is the money well spent? some people have been seeing things that the design and designers may not be attended as much as my peer report.

Introducing the new logo for the office of government commerce, but turn it on the side you just might see why this isn't the best sort out we branding exercise particularly considering it will be this way up when this is placed on pens.

I first saw on it, I laugned out loudly it's very funny, I think the logo should probably be scrapped, almost immediately, I think that's pretty much what OGC is doing. I mean it's a bit of embarrassement, it's funny *, But that logo can never be taken seriously. This is the *, also the OGC that in trouble.

40 thousands pounds were spent on the logo, expensive especially for a government agency which aims to improve the value for money to the taxpayer.

That's embarrass, because when I turning it like that. OGC.

Oh, not very good...that's not very good at all. Cost 40 grand.

No, it's not a joke.

I think it looks like a joke.

I think it would be the color. It's just a logo.

Oh, when I turn it like this.

that looks like..Almost off-see.

Now some people could say, they have dirty minds because they just see the naunty side of the logo. In fact, there's something in the brain which is called the meddler that give you an interpretation or something from your point of view to what actually is. The fact is, in this case, you know, it's what it's. What it looks like, rather fix out likes so fun, and that being ?.

The OGC refuses to comment on the logo, saying only that it had refocus its priority for delivering high quality public services. But it can take some comfort that this is not the first logo coco. And even in the controversial london Olympic logo, apparently some people see these are sympathin doing something on speakable with bars. The moral of the logo story seems always look it both ways.

Now we are doing it all ourselves here. maybe you don't quite get that, you can see it again on our website, I think it's just on the screen right now.

目标:BV issue 100篇!
101;102;105;104;108;111;112;110;114;115;
119;117;129;140;139;938;928;
口译专员推荐—>口译训练软件IPTAM口译通
your point of view应该是一个固定搭配吧。
目标:BV issue 100篇!
101;102;105;104;108;111;112;110;114;115;
119;117;129;140;139;938;928;

HW

Now the government spends 142,000,000 pounds a year on advertising and branding, on things like this, which is the new logo for the Office of Government Commerce. But is it money well spent? Some people have been seeing things in the design that the designers may not have intended. As Rags Martel reports.

 

Introducing the new logo for the Office of Government Commerce, but turn it on its side, and you just might see why this isn't the best thoughtout rebranding exercise, particularly considering it will be this way up when displayed on pens.

 

I must say the first time I saw it, I laughed out loud. It’s very funny. I think the logo should probably be scrapped almost immediately, and I think that’s probably what the OGC are doing. I mean it's a bit of embarrassment, it's a funny episode. But that logo can never be taken seriously. If this is the corporate thought,the OGC, they are in trouble.

 

1400 pounds was spent on the logo, expensive, especially for a government agency which aims to improve value for money to the tax payer.

 

They are a bit embarrassed because when I turn it like that, what could you see?

 

Oh, not very good. That's not very good at all.

 

Cost 14 grand

 

Is this a joke?

 

No, it's not a joke.

 

I think that's a bit of a joke.

 

I think it is in color. It's just a logo.

 

Or, what if I turn it like this.

 

That looks like ha ha ha.

 

Almost obscene.

 

Now some people could say that they have dirty minds, because they are just seeing the naughty side of a logo. In fact, there’s something in the brain which is called the amidola that gives you an interpretation of something from your points of view ,rather what it actually is. The fact is, in this case, you know, it is what it is. And what it looks like, what it rather sticks out like sword fun and that being generous.

 

The OGC refused to comment on the logo, saying only that it had refocused its priorities for delivering high quality public services. But it can take some comfort that this isn't the first logo cock-up.

 

And even in the controversial London Olympic logo, apparently some people see Lisa Simpson doing something unspeakable with Bart. The moral of the logo story yet seems always look at it both ways.

 

Now, we do enjoy ourselves here. And if you didn't quite get that you can see it again on our website at the address on the screen right now...

after the rains , the land  was green with new growth , and it is a topic near and dear to my heart
返回列表