worlf

11# stm006
the picture was so pretty

ngkfgetg

13# sainfoinwy

Although unemployment is very serious soon, which is why we're addressing it, with the ideas and the measures that we are. It would be much much worse if we were not taking the combined action that we as a government and the Bank of England have been taking.
Lord Mandelson can argue all he likes that these jobless figures would have been worse if not for some of the stimulus measures that the government is taking. The fact remains that  2000 people who have lost their jobs everyday during the last year while youth unemployment that’s down to 938,000.
People between the ages of 16 and 24 now account for full 38% of those unemployed and that's gonna have searing repercussions across the whole society as the Order Commission warned earlier this week. The other thing worth noting about these jobless figures is that the disparity between the claimant count by those people who are signing on for job seekers' allowance, and the ILO measure which is a broader measure of those people who are without work but not necessarily claiming benefits is continuing. Now the government is looking at this already, and there are some / suggestions that / may be the case. One theory is that people who've lost their jobs are simply depending on their partners rather than signing on for benefits themselves.
Now there're a couple of rays of hope. First of all, we've had earnings figures out of the day,. Earnings figures in the 3 months to June were up to 2.5% and that's improvement on the previous situation, potentially that's good news for consumer spending. However it should be borne out that's within the private sector which is accounting for 80% of the workforce earnings are rising by some 2.1%. The majority of that increase is in the public sector which again doesn't bode well for the government’s attempts to ease back on public spending.

ILO Measure vs. claimant count:  ILO differs from the claimant count measure which only includes people claiming unemployment-related welfare benefits. The claimant count measure is normally less than the ILO measure as it normally excludes people who do not qualify for jobless-related benefits.

070400304

Homework

Although unemployment is very serious and which is why we are addressing it with the ideas and the measures that we are. It would be much, much worse if we were not taking the combined action that we as a government and a bank of England have been taking.

Lord Mendson can argue he likes that these jobless figures could have been worse we're not offering some stimulus measures that the government is taking .The fact remains the 2000 people who have lost their jobs everyday during the  last year while _ employment _ stands 938,000. People which're in the age of 16 and 24 now account for 4.38% of those unemployed.And that is gonna have _ repercussions across the whole society. I see all the commission warned  earlier this week. The other thing worth noting about these jobless figures is the desperity between the claiment account either those people who're signing the job seek and allowance and the OL Loan Measure which has broadened the measure of those people who're without work but not necessarily claiming the benefits is continuing. Now the government is looking at this already.And there are some suggestion as twice as maybe the case. One theory is that people who've lost their jobs are simply depending on partners _ _ and _ off benefits themselves. Now there're couple of raise of hope.First of all , we had earnings figures out today.Earnings figures in the 3 month to June were up 2.5% and  that's improvement in the previous situation.Potentially that's good news for consumer spending. However, it should be born out that we're in the private sector which is accounting for 8% of the workforce earnings are _ rising  by some 2.1%. The majority of that increases in the public sector which again doesn't bold well for the government's attempts to ease back on public spending.

GracePotter

although the unemployment is very serious soon,which is why we're addressing it.with ideas and messures that we are.it would be much much worse if we were not taking combined action that we as goverment and bank of England have be taking.
L.M can argue all he likes that these jobless figures would have been worse if not for some of the stimulus measures that the government is taking. the fact remains that 2000 people who have lost their jobs every day during last year while youth unemployment that down to 938000.
people between the ages of 16 to 24 now account for all 38% of those unemployed and that go have sering repercussions across the whole society as the O .C. warned ealier  this week.
otherthing will worth nothing about these jobless figures is that the disparity  between the claimant count by those people who are signing on for jobs seekers' allowance,and ilo measure which is a broader measure of theae people who are without work but necessarily claiming benefits is continuing.now the goverment is looking at this already,and there is some suggestions that is one may be case.one theory is  people who have lost jobs simply depending on their partners rather than signing on for benefits themselves.
now there are a couple of rays of hope,first of all,we have earning figures out today.Earning figures in the 3 months to June were up 2.5% and that's improvement on the previous situation,potentially that is good news for consumer spending.however,it be should borne out within the private sector which is accounting for 80% of the workforce earnings are running rising by some 2.1%. The majority of that increase is in the public sector which again doesn't bode well for the government’s attempts to ease back on public spending.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

landfall

homework

Although unemployment is very serious, which is why we are addressing it with the ideas and measures that we are, it would be much much worse if we were not taking the combined action, ...government and bank of England have been taking.

...can argue what he likes, that these jobs of figures would be worse ... not some of the stimulas measures the government is taking.

The fact remains that 2,000 people had lost their jobs everyday during the last year. ...employments ... down 238,000. People between the age of 16 and 24, now account for 38 percent of those unemployed. And that is gonna have ... across whole society... commission ... early this week. ...about this job figures is the disparty between the claim account ... people who assign ... allowance and the ...measure which is a broad measure of those people who without work but not necessaily claming benefits is continuing. Now the government is looking at this already. And there are some suggestions .... maybe the case. One theory is people who've lost their jobs simply depend on their partners, rather than ...benefits of themselves...

Now ...raise of hope, first of all, we ...figures out today. Early figure in the three month to June, 2.5 percent, and that's an improvement on the pevious situation. Potenially, that's good news for consumer's spending. However, it should be ... that within the private sector, which is accounting for 80 percent of the workforce, earning running rising by some 2.1 percent. The majority of that increase in the public sector which again doesn't ... well for the government's attempt to ease back of public spending...

LJH0627

Although unemployment is very serious soon,which is why we are addressing it with the ideas and measures that we are,it would be much much worse if we were not taking the combined action,well as  government and bank of England have been taking.Lord Meldeson can argue all he likes,the job figures would have been worse if not for some of the ----measures the government is taking.The fact remains that 2000 people have lost job everyday during the last year.While youth unemployment next down 938,000.People between the age of 16 and 24 now accout for 38 percent of those unemployed.And that is going to have a serious reproduction across the whole society,as the order commision warned early this week.The other thing worth nothing about the job fegures is the disberity between the claiment count along these people who are signing on for job sicker allowance and----measure which is broaden measure of these people who without work but not necesserily cliaming benifits .It's continue the government is looking at this already and there are some sugestion ----maybe the case.One theory is that people who have lose the job simplely depend on their----rather than search for benifit themselves.Now there are couple's of hope,first we we had earning figuers out today,earn figuers in three months to June had run up to two and a half percent,and it's an improvement in previous situation.protentically that is  good news for comsumer spending.However it should be borne out,that's within the private sector which is accounting for 80 percent of the work force earnings running by some 2.1 percent.The majority of that increase is in the public sector,Which again doesn't ----for government's attempts to ease back on public spending.