陈昱宏_1

中间一句记者外景的while开头的话我发现大家都听得是passion and discussion，我觉得应该是passionate discussion

tarina

The battle to takeover the London 2012 stadium has been as fierce and vocal as pretty much any which will take place in it. Whoever wins this particular race for determine high * for the decade yet to come, and just as importantly whom among us will get to enjoy it.
West town would kick the running dragon who use the venue for atlantics, football, cricket and concerts. Hotsper will demoish half billion pound structure and rebuilt the 60000 seaters stadium in its place specifically for football to very different beds, getting the decision right, its crucial.
It's so much of the after mark of many olympics get Olympic games has been marked by empty stadium, unuseful facilities, lots of public money appearing to have been wasted. We're not going to do that. We plan legacy into our olympic park right from the start. One of the reasons is that we want.
While there's been a lot of passion at the discussion about the merits and *, they're both very strong. Spirits are seen to be the signed financial option, but they promise to deliver unlegacy to helping regenerate the local area and investigate the national scent for atlantics at crystal palace west town is considered to be obvious legacy choice, but they say their finances are signed and calculated on the base of the worse chaos sinario,so even if the club is related to the championship, they will still pay the bills here, meaning crucially you and I won't have to.
That's not to say that there hasnt been one overall favourite in its competition as well as being the local club, west town has most of the supporters and atlantics community on board. Something that Spirits fans saying should be a factor.
Washing top win it, it's because top bid it makes more sense and it's much better commercially and better for the tax payer, and better for the olympic park at long term. Top will become a great anchor attraction if you like, for what would become a great place, a great experience supposed to go. The west town proposed with great respect to them. It's flawed.
It is true that the government and london americans still declined today's recommendation for the stadium, and there will be a number of weeks of negotiating with the partner until anything is signed, whoever takes the lead today though, we'll have a head start, there will be almost impossible to catch.


This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

Hardy10280

the battle to take over the london 2012 stadium has been as fierce and vocal as pretty much any which will take place in it whoever win this particular race will determine how this venue will look in the decades to come and just importantly who among us will get to join it west ham would keep the running track and use venue for athletics football cricket and concerts T would demolish much of the half million pound structer and rebuild 60000seater stadium in its place specificly for football to very different bids getting the decision right is crucial so much of the aftermath of the many olymic games havs been marred by empty stadium unused facility lots of public money appearing to have been wasted we are not going to do that we planned legacy into our olympic park right from the start it is one of the reason the we won while there is been a lot of passionate discussion about the merits of each of bids the fact is there are both very strong spur is seemed to be the signed financial option but they promise to deliver a legacy to helping regenerate the area and investing the national center for athletic and crystal palace west ham is considered to be the obvious legacy choice but they said their finances are signed and calculation are based on the worst case scenarios so even the club is relegated to give the champship they are still be able to pay the bills here meaning crucially you and i will not have to that is no to say there has not been one overall favorite in thsi competition as well as being the local club west ham has most suporters and the athletics community on board something that spurs fans say should not be a factor why should t win it is because t bid really makes more sense and it is much better commercially and better for the tax payer better for the olympic par long term t would become great anchor attraction if you like for what would become a great place a great experience place to go the west ham propose with the greatest respect to them is flawed it is truly that government and london mayor still claim today's recommendation for this stadium and will be a number of weeks of negotiating with the preferred partner until anything is signed whoever takes the lead today though or had a head started that will be the almost impossible to catch      

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

flw2011

the battle to take over the london 2012 stadium has been affairs and vocal has pretty much any which will take place in it.whoever wins this particular reaise  to train in this high even look in the decades to come and just it is importantly who among us will get to enjoy it west town will keep the running track and use the vanad athletics football quicket and concerts.th will demolish the much half a billion pounds of the structure and rebuild sexual stadium in place and per for football to vary different beds getting for the decision right is crucial .you see it is so much of-and-of have any olympic games has been marred by empty stadium unused for facilities ,lots of public money appearing to have been wasted. we are not going to do that .we plan to our olympic park right for start.it is one of the reasons that we want .why there is been lot of passion it has discussion by the merce each of factors .they are both very strong .spur tovbe seen as financial option but they promise tovriver the lrgacy th have the tan of the local area and invest in national centre of athletics and cresaual less harm is considered to be the obvious legacy .but they say their financies are sides and caulerations are based on the worth cares of cinayio. so even the club is right to get the champion .they are still able to pay the bills. Here, meaning crucially, you and I won’t have to.That’s not to say there hasn’t been one overall favorite in this  competition. As well as being the local club, West Ham has most of their  supporters and the athletics community on board. Something that spurs  fans say shouldn't be a factor.Why should Tottenham win it is because Tottenham's bid really makes more  sense, and it’s much better commercially, and better for the tax payer,  and better for the Olympic park a long term. Tottenham would become a  great anchor, attraction if you like, for what would become a great  place, a great experience place to go. The West Ham proposal, with the  greatest respect to them, is flawed.It is truly that the governments and the London mayor can still decline  today’s recommendation for the stadium and it will a number of weeks of  negotiating with the preferred partner until anything is signed. Whoever  takes the lead today though or had a head start; that will be almost  impossible to catch.












                                                   
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

melodyfangtasy1

The battle to take over the London 2012 stadium has been as fierce and * as pretty much any which will take place in it. Whoever wins this particular race will determine how this venue will look in the decades to come and just as important like whom among us will get to enjoy it.

West Ham would keep the running track and * venue for athletics, football, cricket and concerts. * will demolish much of the half-a-billion-pound-structure and rebuild a 60,000-sitter-stadium in its place specifically for football. To very different bids, getting the decision right is crucial.

There are so much of the aftermath of many Olympics, Olympic Games, has been marred by empty stadium, unused facilities, lots of public money appearing to have been wasted. We're not going to do that. We planned a legacy into our Olympic Park right from the start is one of the reasons that we want.

While there has been a lot of passion of discussion about the merits of each of the bidder's factors, they're both very strong. So where is it seem to be the signed financial option but they promised to deliver on legacy to helping regenerate the local area and investing in a national center for athletics at Crystal Palace. West Ham is considered to be the obvious legacy choice. But they say their finances are signed and calculations are based on a worse case scenario so even if the club is ready to get to the championship, they're still be able to pay the bills here, meaning crucially you and I won't have to.

That's not to say there hasn't been one overall favourite in this competition. As well as being the local club, West Ham has most of their supporters and athletics community on board, something that spurs fans say shouldn't be a factor.

* is because *'s bid just makes more sense and it's much better commercially and better for the taxpayer and better for the Olympic Park long term. Taught them we've come a great anchor attraction, if you like, for what we will become a great place, a great experience place to go. The West Ham proposal with the greatest respect to them, it's *.

It is true that the government and the London mayor can still decline today's recommendation for the stadium and it will be a number of weeks of negotiating with the preferred partner until anything is signed. Whoever takes the lead today, though, will have a head start that will be almost impossible to catch.

Orla Chennaoui, Sky News, at the Olympic and Paralympic Stadium in east London.

czy1143

The battle to take over the London 2012 Olympic stadium has been as fierce and vocal as pretty much any that will take place in it. Whoever wins this particular race will determine how this venue will look in the decade that is to come,and just as importantly,whom among us will get to enjoy it.
West Ham would keep the running track and use the venue for athletics,football,criket and concerts. Tottenham hotsper will demolish much of the half-billion-pound structure and rebuild the 60,000-seat stadium and its place specifically for football. To bury different bids,getting the decision right is crucial.
There are so much of the aftermath of many Olympic Games that has been marked by empty stadium,unused fercilities,lots of public money appearing to have been wasted. We’re not going to do that. We planned legacy into our Olympic Park right from the start. It’s one of the reasons that we won.
While there’s been a lot of passion and discussion about demerits to beat to the bid,the fact is,they are both very strong. Spur is the scene to be designed financial options,but they promise to deliver on legacy to help within generally the local area and investing in the national scene of athletics at Crystal Palace. West Ham is considered to be the obvious legacy choice,but they say their finances are signed and calculations are based on a worse … scenerio. So even if the club is relegated to the championship,they’ll still be able to pay the bills here,meaning crucially you and I won’t have to.
That’s not to say there hasn’t been one overall favorite in this competition as well as being the local club,West Ham has most of their supporters and the athletic communities on board,something that spur fans say shouldn’t be a factor.
Why should Totten be the winner is because Totten is the biggest. It makes more sense and it’s much better commercially and benefit the tax-payers and better for the Olympic Park in the long term. Toten will become a great anchor,attraction if you like,for what will become a great place,a great experience place to go. The West Ham’s proposal,with the greatest expect to them,is flawed.
It is true that the government and the London mayor can still decline today’s recommendation for the stadium and there will be a number of weeks of negotiating with the preferred partner until everything is signed. Whoever takes the lead today,though,will have a headstart that will be almost impossible to catch......skynews Olympic and ..stadium in East London.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

jessie3301

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa

周个必

参考参考，我认为很好，大家说说

Inuyasha1366

Homework~
The battle to take over the London 2012 stadium has been as fierce and vocal as pretty much any which will take place in it. Whoever wins this particular race will determine how this venue will look in the decades to come,and just importantly,whom among us will get to enjoy it.West Ham would keep the running track and use the venue for athletics,football,criket and concerts.Tottenham Hotspur will demolish much of the half of a billion pounds of structure and rebuild a 60,000 seats stadium in its place,specifically for football.Two very different bids,getting the decision right is crucial. it's so much of the aftermath of many Olympic Games,has been marred by empty stadium,unused facilities,lots of public money,appearing to have been wasted,we're not going to do that,we planed legacy into our Olympic Park right from the start,it's one of the reasons that we won.While there has been a lot of passionate discussion about the merits of each of the bids,the fact is they are both very strong,spur is seem to be the signed fanancial option,but they promised deliver a legacy to helping regenerate a local area and investing in a national center for athletics at Crystal Palace,West Ham is consider to be the obvious legacy choice,but they say their finances are signed and calcuation are based on the worst case scenarios,so even the club is relegated to the championship,they are being able to pay the bills,here,meaning crucially,you and I won't have to.That's not to say there hasn't been one overall favorite in this competition,as well as being the local club,West Ham has most of their supporters and their athletics community on board,something that spurs fans say shouldn't be a factor.Why should Totterman win it,it is because Totterman's bid makes more sense,and it's much better commercially,and better for the tax payer and better for the Olympic Park in a long term,Totterman would be a great anchor,attraction if you like,for what would become a great place to go,the West Ham proposed with great expectest to them is flawed.It is truth that the government on the London America still to claimed today's recommendation for the stadium and will be a number of weeks of negotiating with prefered partner until anything is signed,whoever takes the lead today though will have heads start,there will be almost impossible to catch.