只用一本书提高英语听力能力!重温经典名著双语阅读小编推荐:跟着纪录片学英语不背单词和语法,轻松学英语
返回列表 回复 发帖

[豆知识] 【整理】2011-08-21&08-27 化妆品的故事 (2/3)

提高英语听力能力 找对方法很重要!

[Homework]【整理】2011-08-21&08-27 化妆品的故事 (2/3)

One thing we do know is the ingredient inside us. I had my body’s toxins level tested, and I’m lowed with things like <>. We all are, even babies are being born pre-polluted. Now I know we can’t live a led every world. But do we have to put lather on lipstick? I don’t know. Maybe it’s my fault. Maybe I just bought the wrong thing. At the store, the choices seem endless. I can get lipsticks in forty-nine shades, or shampoo for head that she drive oily find lipple freezy. But what about the choices really matter. Like the choice by product that are safe. It turns out the important decisions don’t happen when I choose the product off the shelf. They happen when companies and government decide what product should go on the shelves. So who are these convince? This is <> gamble. Third once offer me urble accesses the number two shampoo in the country. It contains toxic petrol chemicals, made from oil, since when is the oil on the earth. On cosmetics labels, words like erble, natural even organic have no legal definition. That means anybody can put anything in the bottle called natural, and they do. I mean can you imagine the top seller called petrol accesses? Rose. What’s even <>, or here we <> to mark five year olds and skim white increase. These are super toxics, both in their ingredients and in the message they send about what beauty is.
   
  Oh, here’s <> offering me a chance to help find a kill for breast cancer. That’s nice. But wait, they also using chemicals link to cancer. Don’t you think the best way for <> to fight cancer is to stop using those chemicals the first place? So really, I get to choose between the minimal scream on the bottle. But these guys get the real choice about what goes into those bottles, and that happens by <>, at the factories with the formulated. What did the makers of these products use of these toxics? Are they trying to poison us? No, they are just working from the 1950’s mind set when people were totally swept up in better living through chemistry. In the hot excitement they forgot to worry about human health impacts. That was a year ago and they are using the same or toxic chemicals. Today, big cosmetics companies say the doses of poison in the practice are small enough to be harmless. Yes, maybe for using once a year. I guess they never give up and see that the products have been using to <> with other products every day. A little types due some to your arms, a little more on your hair, and your lips, and workers in nail and health wants get those all day long.
                                                     
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

[Homework]【整理】2011-08-21&08-27 化妆品的故事 (2/3)

[Homework]
On thing we do know is that they're getting inside us. I had my body tup untested and I'm loaned with things mercury. Flamers, and land, we all are, even babies are borned pre-polluted.Now I know we can't live in a world, but do I have to put lab on lipstick. I don't know. Maybe it's my fault, maybe I just bought the wrong thing. At store, the choices seem endless, I can get lipsticks in 49 shapes or shampoo for hires to dry, oily, fine, limper, frizzy. But what about the choices are really matter? Like the choice about products that are safe. It turns out the important decisions don't happen when I chose the products off the shelves. They happen when companies and governments decide what products should go on the shelves. So who are the campaigns. This is protecting gamble, 3rd one offer me urban essences the no.2 shampoo in the company. It contains tospatrichamicals, made from oil since when the oil is on urb. On cosmetics label, words like urban, natural, even organic has no leagal definination. That means anybody can put anything in a bottle and called a natural and they do. I mean can you imagine the top seller called patrol essences, groace. What a nasty or hair relaxer and skin whitening creams, they're super tox, both in their grendience and messages they sent about what beauty is. Ho, here is S.t.lawter offering me a chance to find curer for breast cancer, that's nice, but wait. They also using chemicals link to cancer, do I have think the a best way for S.t.lawter to fight cancer is to stop using chemicals in the first place. So really, I get to choose between meaningless claims in the bottle, but these guys get real choices about what is into those bottles. That happens back here. And the factories use the formulated. Why don't the makers of products use these products. Are they trying to poison us? No. They're just working on the 1750s mine sight when people were totally swapping about living through better chemistry in hope that there is no human health impact. That was years ago and they're still using the same old toxchemicals. Today, big cost of medical company says does of poisonous are small enough to be harmless. Yes, maybe using them for a year, I guess I never give up to combine one product with another everyday, a little doms on your arms, on your hair, on your lips.


This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
立即获取| 免费注册领取外教体验课一节

[Homework]【整理】2011-08-21&08-27 化妆品的故事 (2/3)

One thing we do know is (the) getting inside us.I had my body's (tested) and my labour tested.And I'm () with things like mejory,(),(),()and lead.We all are,even babies are been born pretty polluted.Now I know we can live in the () world,but we have to put () on lipsticks.I don't know,maybe it's my fault,maybe I just bought the wrong thing.At the store,the choices seem endless,I can get lipsticks in 49 shapes,or shampoo for hair() 5().But what about the choices really matter?Like choices by product it's safe. It turns out the important decisions don't happen when I choose the product off the shelf.They happen when companies and governments decided what product should go on the shelves.So who are this companies?This is P&G.Third ones offering (),the no.2 shampoo in the country.It contains ()petrol chemicals,made from oil,things wo know as oil and ().On cosmetics labours,words as labour,natural even organic have no legal defination.That means anyboby can put anything in the bottle encalled natural,and they do.I mean can you imagine the top salon called petrol () grows?What's even (nest)or hear relaxed is (fin oils)and skin whitening creams.These are super (tarsic),both of the ingrediets and the messages they send about what beauty is.Oh,here is the ()of the .That's nice,but wait,there is using chemicals link to ().do you think the best way for ()is to stop using chemicals first places?So,really,I get to choose between the meaninga claims on the bottle,but these guyshe get real choices what into these bottles.That happens by kill,factories with the formulate.Why do they make these products ues on this ()?Are they try to poisoned us?No.They were just working for 1950s,when people was told better living chemistry.In the ()excitment they forgot to worry about the human health.That was years ago,and they're still using this same()chemicals.Today,the cosmetic companies say are smaller and harmless.Yeah maybe for use them once a year.I guess they never get out and see that their products are used ()products everyday.A little () on your arms, alittle more on your hair,on your lips.And the workers all day long.
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
实现无障碍英语沟通
One thing we do know is that they’re getting inside us. I had my body's toxicity levels tested and I’m loaded with things like mercury, flame retardants, triclosan and lead! We all are. Even babies are being born pre-polluted.



Now I know we can't live in a lead free world, but do we have to put lead in our lipstick? I don't know. Maybe it's my fault. Maybe I just bought the wrong thing. At the store, the choices seem endless. I can get lipstick in 49 shades or shampoo for hair that's too dry, oily, fine, limp or frizzy, but what about the choices that really matter? Like the choice to buy products that are safe. It turns out the important decisions don't happen when I choose to take a product off the shelf. They happen when companies and governments decide what products should go on the shelves.



So who are these companies? This is Procter & Gamble. They’re the ones offering me Herbal Essences, the number two shampoo in the country. It contains toxic petro chemicals made from oil. Since when is oil an herb? On cosmetics labels, words like “herbal”, “natural”, even “organic” have no legal definition. That means anybody can put anything in a bottle and call it natural. And they do. I mean, can you image a top seller called “Petro Essences”? Gross. What’s even nastier are hair relaxers marketed to five-year olds and skin whitening creams. These are super toxic both in their ingredients and in the messages they send about what beauty is. Oh, here is Estee Lauder offering me a chance to help find a cure for breast cancer. That's nice. But wait, they’re also using chemicals linked to cancer. Don’t you think the best way for Estee Lauder to fight cancer is to stop using those chemicals in the first place? So really, I get to choose between meaningless claims on a bottle. But these guys get the real choice about what goes into those bottles. And that happens back here, at the factories where they’re formulated.



Why do the makers of these products use all these toxics? Are they trying to poison us? No, they’re just working from a 1950s mindset when people were totally swiped up in better their living through chemistry. In all that excitement, they forgot to worry about human health impacts. That was years ago, and they are still using the same old toxic chemicals. Today, big cosmetics companies say the doses of poison in their products are small enough to be harmless. Yeah, maybe if you use them once a year! I guess they never get out and see that their products are being used and combined with other products every day: a little toxic dose under your arms, a little more on your hair, on your lips. And workers in nail and hair salons get dosed all day long!

由jessiyear在 整理的生词:
mercury: n. a silver-colored liquid metal that is used especially in thermometers and barometers 汞



flame retardants: 阻燃剂



triclosan: 三氯生



lead: n. a soft heavy grey metal that melts easily and is poisonours  铅



shade: n. a particular type of red, green, blue etc. 色度
口译专员推荐—>口译训练软件IPTAM口译通
One thing we do know is that they’re getting inside us. I have my body’s toxicity levels tested, and I’m loaded with things like mercury, flame retardants, triclosan and lead. We all are. Even babies are being born pre-polluted.
Now I know we can’t live in lead-free world. But do we have to put lead in my lipstick? I don’t know. Maybe it’s my fault. Maybe I just bought the wrong thing. At the store, the choices seem endless. I can get lipstick in 49 shades, or shampoo for hair that’s too dry, oily, fine, limp or frizzy, but what about the choices that really matter? Like the choice to buy products that they are safe. It turns out the important decisions don’t happen when I choose take a product off the shelf. They happen when companies and government decide what products should go on the shelves.
So who are these companies? This is Procter & Gamble. They’re the ones offering Herbal Essences, the No.2 shampoo in the country. It contains toxics petrol chemicals made from oil. Since when is oil a herb? On cosmetic labels, words like “herbal” “natural” even “organic” have no legal definition. That means anybody can put anything in a bottle and call it “natural”, and they do. I mean can you imagine a top seller called “Petro Essences? Gross. What‘s even nastier are hair relaxers marketed to five-year old and skin whitening cream? These are super toxics both in their ingredients and the message they send what they built is. Oh, here’s Estee Lauder offering me a chance find a cure for breast cancer. That’s nice. But wait! They also use chemicals linked to cancer. Don’t you think the best way for Estee Lauder to fight cancer is to stop using those chemicals in the first place? So really, I get to choose between the meaningless claims on the bottle. But these guys get the real choice about what goes into those bottles. And that happens back here at the factories where they are formulated.
Why do the makers of these products use all these toxics? Are they trying to poison us? No, they are just working from a 1950s mindset when people were totally swiped up in better living through chemistry. In all that excitement they forgot to worry about human healthy impacts. That was years ago and they still using the same old toxic chemicals. Today, big cosmetic companies say the doses of poison in the products are small enough to be harmless. Yeah maybe if you use them once a year! I guess they never get out and see that the products are used combined with other products every day: a little toxic under your arms, a little more on your hair and your lips and workers in nail and hair salons get does all day long.
[Homework]   Bits of knowledge  "The Story of Cosmetics---part 2"   20110821

One thing we do know is that they are getting inside us, I had my body's toxic levels tested, and I am loaded with things like mercury, flame retardants, *  and lead. We all are, even babies are being born pre-polluted. Now I know we can live in a lead-free world, but do we have to put lead on our lipstick, I don't know, may be it is my fault. May be I just bought the wrong thing. At the store, the choices seem endless. I can get lipsticks in 49 shades, or shampoo for here that's to dry, oilly fine, limper freezy.

But what about the choices that really matter? Like the choice by products that are safe, it turns out the important desicions don't happen when I choose this product off the shelf. they happen when companies and government decide what products should go on the shelfs, so who are these companies? This is product Procter & Gamble(宝洁). There are ones offering me herbal essences, the No.2 shampoo in the country, it contains toxic petro chemicals made from oil, since when the oil in herb? On cosmetics labels, words like "herbal, natural, even organic" have no legal definition, that means that anybody can put anything in the bottle and call it natural. And they do. I mean, can you imagine the top seller called petro essences? gross.

What is even nastier are hair relaxer marketed to five year olds and skin white creams, these are super toxics, both in their ingredients, and the message they send about what beauty is, oh, here is Estee Lauder(雅诗兰黛) offer me a chance to help fight careful breast cancer, that's nice, but wait, they are also using chemicals linked to cancer. Don't you think the best way for Estee Lauder to fight cancer is to stop using those chemicals in the first place? So really, I get to choose between the meaningless claims on the bottle, but these guys get the real choice about what equals to those bottles. And that happens back here, at the factories where are formulated, what the makers of these products use all these toxics, are they trying to poison us? No, they are just working for my 1950s' mindset when people were totally swept up in better living through chemistry.

In all that excitment, they forgot to worry about human healthy impacts, that was years ago, and they are still using the same old toxic chemicals. Today, big cosmetics companies say the doses of poison in the products are small and enough to be harmless, yeah, may be if you use them once a year. I guess i never get out to see the product are being used and combined with other products every day, a little toxics dose on your arm, and a little more on your hair, on your lips, and workers' nails and hair salons get dosed all day along.
返回列表