只用一本书提高英语听力能力!重温经典名著双语阅读小编推荐:跟着纪录片学英语不背单词和语法,轻松学英语
返回列表 回复 发帖

[文化博览] 【整理】2011-09-16 虚拟革命 免费的代价 The Cost of Free —21

提高英语听力能力 找对方法很重要!

[文化博览] 【整理】2011-09-16 虚拟革命 免费的代价 The Cost of Free —21

 

 

虚拟革命 免费的代价  | The Virtual Revolution


    一个沉默的故事,一场无声的革命。影响了地球上的每个人。网络发明后,20多年过去了。我们一起探讨网络带来的深远影响——无论好坏,数字革命是如何改变了人类的生活呢?记者兼大学教师Aleks Krotoski博士走访全球,研究网络改变一切的意义,包括我们如何学习、购物、投票、交友等等。目前全球有四分之一的人上网,一起探讨当世界剩下的四分之三的人将要上网时,我们的网络又为他们准备了什么呢?互联网是免费的,但是有代价的!本期节目就google为例,为你揭示天下没有免费的午餐。而类似亚马逊网站的推荐引擎,可以建立用户数据库,那么,个人隐私是否受侵害呢?

  

   20多年前,英国人蒂姆·博纳斯李发明了互联网。“只是因为我自己需要”他对BBC说。从那时起世界不再是以前的世界。这20年在世界历史上转瞬即逝,但全球互联网却在这20年间高速发展。网络改变了全世界的社会组织形式。社会上越来越多的部门,以爆炸性的速度并通过各种形式与网络联系在一起。

 

In the third programme of the series, Aleks gives the lowdown on how, for better and for worse, commerce has colonised the web - and reveals how web users are paying for what appear to be 'free' sites and services in hidden ways. Joined by some of the most influential business leaders of today's web, including Jeff Bezos (CEO of Amazon), Eric Schmidt (CEO of Google), Chad Hurley (CEO of YouTube), Bill Gates, Martha Lane Fox and Reed Hastings (CEO of Netflix), Aleks traces how business, with varying degrees of success, has attempted to make money on the web. She tells the inside story of the gold rush years of the dotcom bubble and reveals how retailers such as Amazon learned the lessons. She also charts how, out of the ashes, Google forged the business model that has come to dominate today's web, offering a plethora of highly attractive, overtly free web services, including search, maps and video, that are in fact funded through a sophisticated and highly lucrative advertising system which trades on what we users look for. Aleks explores how web advertising is evolving further to become more targeted and relevant to individual consumers. Recommendation engines, pioneered by retailers such as Amazon, are also breaking down the barriers between commerce and consumer by marketing future purchases to us based on our previous choices. On the surface, the web appears to have brought about a revolution in convenience. But, as companies start to build up databases on our online habits and preferences, Aleks questions what this may mean for our notions of privacy and personal space in the 21st century.

user posted image



电信下载1:
Video download          Mp3 download

电信下载2:
Video download          Mp3 download

网通下载:
Video download          Mp3 download

迅雷高速:
Video download          Mp3 download



版主提示:
一、若是自己的听写稿, 请发帖时标注'Homework'.
二、若是改稿, 请发帖时标注'on 某某人'并在修改处标红.
三、为了达到最快的下载速度,推荐使用迅雷高速下载本站音频/视频材料.

 

四、欢迎参与口译练习我爱背单词佳句背诵口语模仿在线听写训练普特播客.




kinglimk在 整理的参考文本:


------------for reference only------------

The irony is, young people actually understand the cooperation advertising trade-off better than they understand the long term of implications of that data and information. So one of the things you’ll hear from young people is they’ll say“well, if it gives me ads, you know, that means that will be free. And you know I’d rather be free.” And part of it is they’ve never known a non-commercial world, advertising is pervasive in their lives.


The generation growing up with the web may be embracing commercial reality in return for free convenience, but aren’t they missing out on what the old web once promised?

What we’ve done is limited the range of human expression and activity on the Internet to those things that are market-friendly. Look at the devolution of people’s personal presence online from the quirky individualistic, highly personalized websites, the home pages of the HTML mid 90s, to the now utterly conformist and rigid profiles, on something like MySpace and Facebook. You can no longer define yourself by anything.You must define yourself by what books you buy, by what movies you like, by what actresses you aspire to, by whether you are single, married, or looking,or by things that the market understands.

But the problems facing the younger generation run deeper still. I’m concerned that there is little understanding of one of the fundamentals of digital information. Once it’s on the web, it’s almost impossible to erase.

All of our interactions on the web from our Facebook and Twitter status updates to news we share with family and friend, to gossip that’s spread about us, will be online forever. The web effectively makes us immortal. The upside is that we can live on. There are thousands of dead people who are still receiving updates and even being poked on Facebook.But the downside is that young people who are growing up in public by living so much of their lives on the web, will have to face living with all of their youthful indiscretions that can now be accessed by anyone, future bosses,future partners, future friends and that’s for the rest of their lives.

普特在线文本比较普特在线听音查字普特在线拼写检查普特文本转音频

支持普特英语听力就多多发帖吧!您们的参与是对斑竹工作最大的肯定与支持!如果您觉得还不错,推荐给周围的朋友吧~
HW

The irony is, young people much understand the cooperation advertising trade of better than they understand the long term of collection of that data and information. So one of the things you will hear young people to say, “well, if it gives me ads, it means that will be free. And you know I’d rather be free.” And part of this is they don’t know a non-commercial world, advertising is pervasive in their lives.

The generation growing up with the web may be embracing commercial reality in return for free convenience, but are they missing out what the old web once promised?

What we’ve done is limited the range of human expression and activity on the Internet to those things that are marketed friendly. Look at the devolution of people’s personal presence online from the quirky individual elastic, highly personalized websites, the home pages of the HTML mid 90s, to the now oddly conformist and rigid profiles, something like MySpace and Facebook. You can no longer define yourself by anything. You must define yourself by what books you buy, by what movies you like, by what actress you aspire to, by whether you are single, married, or looking, by things that the market understands.

But the problems facing the younger generation run deep still. I’m concerned that there is little understanding of one of the fundamentals of digital information. Once it’s on the web, it’s almost impossible to erase.

All of our interactions on the web from our Facebook and Twitter space data updates to news we share with family and friend, to gossip that spread about us, will be online forever. The web effectively made us immortal. The upside is we can live on. There are thousands of dead people who are still receiving updates and even being post on Facebook. But the downside is that young people who are growing up in public by living so much of their lives on web, will have to face living with all of their youthful indiscretions that can now be accessed by anyone, future bosses, future partners, future friends and that’s for the rest of their lives.
1

评分次数

  • kinglimk

立即获取| 免费注册领取外教体验课一节

[Homework]2011-09-16 虚拟革命 免费的代价 The Cost of Free —21

The irony is young people actually understand the cooperation advertising pret of better than understand of long term vacation of that data and information. So one of things you will hear young people tosay, if it gives ads, you will let it be free. And you know, I'd rather be free. And part of this is they are never known a non-comercial world. Adverstising is pervasive in their lives.

The generation growing up the web, may be embracingcommercial reality in return for free convenient. But all that missing what the old web want to promised
.

What we have done is limited the range of human expression and activity on the Internet, to those things that are marketly friendly. Look at the devolution of people personal presentence online from the corky individualistic, highly personalize the websites, the homepages of be html meet 90s. To them now, oddly conformist unrigid profiles on something like myspace and facebook. You can no longer define yourself by anything, you must define yourself by what books you buy, what movies you like, by what actress you aspire to, by whether you are single ,married or looking, by things that the market understands
.

The problems facing the younger generation run deeper still. I am concerned that there is little understanding of one of the fundamental digital information. Once on a web, it is almost impossible to
erase.

All of our interaction on the web from our facebook and twitters datas to news we share with family and friends to gossip the spead about us, be online forever. The web us a model, the website that we can live on are thousands of dead people who are still recieving the and ending the post of the facebook. The downside is the young people who are growing up in public by living so much their lives on web, the half of face, living without all of their useful discretion that can not be accessed to anyone. future bosses ,future partners, future friends and for rest of their lives
.






This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
1

评分次数

实现无障碍英语沟通

[Homework]2011-09-16 虚拟革命 免费的代价 The Cost of Free —21

The irony is, young people actually understand the cooperation advertising pretty of better than the understand the long term of the [size=-1]negotiation of bad data and agreeation. So one of things you will hear young people to say is, Well, if it gives me ads, it means that will be free. And you know I'd rather it would be free. And part of that they never know a non-commercial world. Advertising is pervasive in our lives.
  The generation growing up with the web may be embracing the commercial reality and return for free convenience, but all things missing out was the old web once promised?
  What they've done is limited. The range of human expression and activity on the Internet to both things that are marked friendly. Look at the devolution are people's personal presence on line, from the quirky individual elastic, highly personalized websites, the home pages of the HTML mid-90s, to the now oddly conformist and rigid profiles, and something like my space and Facebook. You can no longer define yourself by anything, you must define yourself by what books you buy, by what movies you like, by what actress you admire to, by whether you are single, married or looking, by the things that market understands.
  But the problem facing to the younger generation run deeper still. I'm concerned that there is little understanding of one of the fundamental digital of information. Once is on the web, it is almost impossible to erase.
  All of our interactions on the web form our Facebook and Twitter space updates to news we share with our family and our friends, to gossip us, spread about us, will be on line forever. The web effectively make us immortal. THe upsides is we can move on. There are thousands of dead people who are still receiving updates and even being post on the Facebook. But the downsides is that young people, who are growing up with public by living so much of their lifes  on the web, will have to face with living all of  these useful ** that now can be accessed by anyone, future bosses, future partners, future friends. That's the rest of our lifes.
                                                   
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
1

评分次数

口译专员推荐—>口译训练软件IPTAM口译通
Elainewjy

The irony is, young people understand the cooperation advertising trade-off better than they understand the long term of implications of that data and information. So one of the things here from young people they will hear  “well, if it gives me ads, it means that will be free. And you know I’d rather be free.” And part of this is they don’t know a non-commercial world, advertising is pervasive in their lives.

The generation growing up with the web may be embracing commercial reality in return for free convenience, but are they missing out what the old web once promised?

What we’ve done is limiting the range of human expression and activity on the Internet to those things that are market-friendly. Look at the devolution of people’s personal presence online from the quirky individualistic, highly personalized websites, the home pages of the HTML mid 90s, to the now utterly conformist and rigid profiles, on something like MySpace and Facebook. You can no longer define yourself by anything. You must define yourself by what books you buy, by what movies you like, by what actresses you aspire to, by whether you are single, married, or looking, or by things that the market understands.

But the problems facing the younger generation run deeper still. I’m concerned that there is little understanding of one of the fundamentals of digital information. Once it’s on the web, it’s almost impossible to erase.

All of our interactions on the web from our Facebook and Twitter's data updates to news we share with family and friend, to gossips that spread about us, will be online forever. The web effectively made us immortal. The upside is we can live on. There are thousands of dead people who are still receiving updates and even being post on Facebook. But the downside is that young people who are growing up in public by living so much of their lives on web, will have to face living with all of their youthful indiscretions that can now be accessed by anyone, future bosses, future partners, future friends and that’s for the rest of their lives.
on 楼上
The irony is, young people actually understand the cooperation advertising trade-off better than they understand the long term of implications of that data and information. So one of the things here from young people you will hear is “well, if it gives me ads, you know, that means that will be free. And you know I’d rather be free.” And part of it is they’ve never known a non-commercial world, advertising is pervasive in their lives.

The generation growing up with the web may be embracing commercial reality in return for free convenience, but are
n’t they missing out on what the old web once promised?

What we’ve done is
limited the range of human expression and activity on the Internet to those things that are market-friendly. Look at the devolution of people’s personal presence online from the quirky individualistic, highly personalized websites, the home pages of the HTML mid 90s, to the now utterly conformist and rigid profiles, on something like MySpace and Facebook. You can no longer define yourself by anything. You must define yourself by what books you buy, by what movies you like, by what actresses you aspire to, by whether you are single, married, or looking, or by things that the market understands.

But the problems facing the younger generation run deeper still. I’m concerned that there is little understanding of one of the fundamentals of digital information. Once it’s on the web, it’s almost impossible to erase.

All of our interactions on the web from our Facebook and Twitter
status updates to news we share with family and friend, to gossip/ that’s spread about us, will be online forever. The web effectively makes us immortal. The upside is we can live on. There are thousands of dead people who are still receiving updates and even being poked on Facebook. But the downside is that young people who are growing up in public by living so much of their lives on the web, will have to face living with all of their youthful indiscretions that can now be accessed by anyone, future bosses, future partners, future friends and that’s for the rest of their lives.
1

评分次数

智乱天下 武逆乾坤

[Homework]2011-09-16 虚拟革命 免费的代价 The Cost of Free —21

Irony is that young people actually understand the corporation advertising trade off better than they understand the long term implications of that data, and information. So one of the things you'll hear from young people. They will say: Well if it gives me ads you know that means it'll be free. And you know, I'd rather be free. Part of it is they've never known a non-commercial world. Advertising is pervasive in their lives. A generation growing up with the Web may be embracing commercial reality in return for free convenience. But aren't they missing out on what the old Web once promised?

What we've done is limited the range of human expression and activity
on the internet to those things that are market-friendly. Look at the devolution of people's personal presence online, from the quirky, individualistic, highly-personalized websites, and the homepages of the HTML mid-90s to the now utterly conformist and rigid profiles on something like MySpace and Facebook. You can no longer define yourself by anything. You must define yourself by what books you buy, by what movies you like, by what actresses
you aspire to, by whether you are single, married, or looking, by things that the market understands.

But the problems facing the younger generation run deeper still. I'm concerned that there is little understanding of one the fundamentals of digital information. Once it's on the Web, it is almost impossible to erase.
All of our interactions on the Web, from our Facebook and Twitter status updates, to news that we share with family and friends, to gossip that's spread about us will be on line forever. The Web effectively makes us
immortal. The upside is that we can live on. There are thousands of dead people who are still receiving updates and even being poked on Facebook. But the downside is that young people, who are growing up in public by living so much of their lives on the Web will have to face living with all of their youthful indiscretions that can be accessed by anyone. Future bosses, future partners, future friends, and that's for the rest of their lives.



This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
1

评分次数

实现无障碍英语沟通
The irony is young people actually understand the cooperation advertising tradeoff better than they understand the long term implications about data and information. so one of the things you will hear from young people, they'll say, well if it gives ads, it'll never be free and I’d rather they'll be free, but part of it that they never know a noncommercial world, advertising is pervasive in their lives.

Generation growing up with the web may be embracing commercial reality in return for free convenience, but are things missing out on what the old web once promised?
What we've done is limited the range of human expression and its activity on the Internet to those things that are market-friendly, look at the devolution of people's personal presence online, from the quirky individualistic ,highly personalized websites, the homepages of the Html mid-90s to the now utterly conformist and rigid profiles on something like Myspace and facebook. You can no longer define yourself by anything, you must define yourself by what books you buy, by what movies you like, by what actress you aspire to, by whether you were single, married, or looking, by things that the market understands.

But the problems facing the younger generation run deeper still. I’m concerned that there's little understanding of one of the fundamentals of digital information, once it's on the web, it's almost impossible to erase. All our interactions on the web from our facebook and twitter status updates to news we share with family and friends to gossips spread about us will be online forever. the web effectively makes us immortal. The outside is that we can live on, there are thousands of dead people who are receiving updates and even posted on facebook. but the downside is that young people who are growing up in public by leaving so much of their lives on the web will have to face living with all of their useful indiscretions they can now be accessed by anyone, future bosses, future partners, future friends and that's for the rest of their lives.
1

评分次数

普特听力大课堂

[Homework]2011-09-16 虚拟革命 免费的代价 The Cost of Free —21

The irony is that young people actually understand the corporation advertising tradeoff better than they understand the long term implication of that data and information. So one of the things you will hear from young people that will say, well, if you give me ads, you will let me get free.You know, I'd rather be free. And part of this is that they never know a non-commercial world. Advertising is pervasive in their lives.
The generation growing up with the web may be embracing commercial reality in return for free convenience. But aren't they missing out on what the old web once promised?
What we've done is limiting the range of human expression and activity on the internet to those things that are market friendly. Look at the devolution of people's personal presence online from the cocky individualistic, highly personlized websites, the homepages of the html mid 90s, to the now utterly comformist and rigid profiles on something like MySpace and Facebook. You can no longer define yourself by anything, you must define yourself by what books you buy, by what movies you like, by what actresses you aspire to,by whether you are single, married, or looking, by things that the market understands.
But the problems facing the younger generation run deeper still. I'm concerned that there is little understanding of one of the fundamentals of digital information. Once it's on the web, it's almost impossible to erase.
All of our interations on the web from our Facebook and Twitter status update, to news that we share with family and friend, to gossips that spread about us will be online forever. The web effectively makes us immortal. The upside is that we can live on . There are thousands of dead people who are still receiving updates, and even being poked on Facebook. But the downside is that young people who are growing up in public by living so much of their lives on the web will have to face living with all of their useful indiscretion that now can be accessed by anyone, future bosses, future partners, future friends, and that for the rest of their lives.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
1

评分次数

好栏目推荐之美国口语俚语
HW

'The irony is that young people actually understand the corporation-advertising trade off better than they understand the long-term implications of that data and information. So one of the things you'll hear from young people is they'll say 'Well, if it gives me adds, that means it will be free, and I'd rather be free.' And part of this is they've never known a non-commercial world. Advertising is pervasive in their lives.'

The generation growing up with the Web may be embracing commercial reality in return for free convenience, but aren't they missing out on what the old Web once promised?  

'What we've done is limiting the range of human expression and activity on the Internet to those that are market'friendly. Look at the devolution of people's personal presence online, from the quirky, individualistic, highly personalized websites, the home pages of the html mid 90es, to the utterly conformist and rigid profiles on something like Myspace and Facebook. You can no loner define yourself by anything. You must define yourself by what books you buy, what movies you like, by what actresses you aspire to, by whether you are single, married or looking - by things that the market understands.'

But the problems facing the younger generation run deeper still. I'm concerned that there is little understanding of one of the fundamentals of digital information - once it's on the Web, it's almost impossible to erase.

All of our interactions on the Web from the Facebook and Twitter status updates, to the news that we share with family and friends, to gossip that's spread about us will be online forever. The Web effectively makes us immortal. The upside is that we can live on. There are thousands of dead people who are still receiving updates and even being posed on Facebook. But the downside is that the young people who are growing up in public by living so much of their lives on the Web will have to face living with all their youthful indiscretions that can now be accessed by anyone - future bosses, future partners, future friends, and that's for the rest of their lives.
無三界可出,無菩提可求
妄情既不起,真心任遍知
返回列表