只用一本书提高英语听力能力!重温经典名著双语阅读小编推荐:跟着纪录片学英语不背单词和语法,轻松学英语
返回列表 回复 发帖

[访谈录] 2015-12-23&12-25 《绯闻女孩》凯莉·卢瑟福争孩子抚养权失败

提高英语听力能力 找对方法很重要!

[访谈录] 2015-12-23&12-25 《绯闻女孩》凯莉·卢瑟福争孩子抚养权失败

user posted image
 Judge Rules in Kelly Rutherford's Custody Battle


The former "Gossip Girl" actress says she has been banned from bringing her kids to the United States.


user posted image

【电信1】 RealVideo / mp3

【电信2】 RealVideo / mp3

【网通/教育网】 RealVideo / mp3

【迅雷高速下载】 RealVideo / mp3

点击进入访谈录整理稿汇总页面

点击进入多主题版块听写规则(新手必读)


版主提示:
一、若是自己的听写稿, 请发帖时标注'Homework'.
二、若是改稿, 请发帖时标注'on 某某人'并在修改处标红.
三、为了达到最快的下载速度,推荐使用迅雷高速下载本站音频/视频材料.

普特在线文本比较普特在线听音查字普特在线拼写检查普特文本转音频

支持普特英语听力就多多发帖吧!您们的参与是对斑竹工作最大的肯定与支持!如果您觉得还不错,推荐给周围的朋友吧~

[Homework]2015-12-23&12-25 《绯闻女孩》凯莉·卢瑟福争孩子抚养权失败

Devastating defeat for KellyRutherford in her bitter custody battle. A judge has ruled she can only visither kids in Monaco or France. The Rutherford has not done fighting. KellyRutherford has been banned from bringing her kids home to the United States.It's a crushing blow to the highly publicized six year globe spanning custodybattle for her two children with ex-husband German businessman DanielGiersch, who is living with her children in Monaco and France since 2012. According to courtdocuments, Monaco Judges ruled Tuesday that the quoted habitual residence of the miner children is fixed at the residence of Giersch, or Rutherford can visither children exclusively in France or Monaco.  No words, thismoment. In August, New York, Judges ruled the children be returned to theirfather after Rutherford disobeyed Monaco court orders, sending them back toEurope as part of the custody agreement. We spoke to her just days after. This was the first five weeks I've had with my kids straightend in six years. Rutherford and herlawyer maintained her kids only supposed to live in Europe temporarily, ortheir father were to acquire current visa.  For three years, he didnothing, he violated his agreement, no one in American court seems to give adamn. Rutherford attoney said both New York and California where she live withchildren relinquished jurisdiction to courts in Monaco. And Danny is back rightnow. You've been following the cases for years, isn't it? She's still going to appeal in Monaco, but she's got up appeal battle.Don't blame Monaco on this. This is really California's fault. 2000, 2012,2013, California says we are gonna send kids to Europe temporarily, becausehis visa was revoked. we want him to have access to the kids. they said, don'tworry, we were ta jurisdictions here. we were gonna put all sorts of rulesand regulation about what's gonna happen. he is gonna try have visa and comeback here. and then it's all gonna happen back in United States. Couple ofyears later, they go back to California, Kelly Rutherford says he is notfollowing the rules, you said you were jurisdiction. California courts said,you know what, kids don't live here anymore, you don't live here anymore, thefather doesn't live here anymore, we don't have jurisdiction exactly. California courts set this up, so the bottomline is don't blame Monaco, because from Monaco's perspective, the kids havebeen living there for 2 or 3 years.  But did anything she did makeit worse for her? Yeah, there's no question that Monaco courts has useagainst her the fact that last time the kids came to United States, sheannounced she wasn't going to send her kids back. why, because she said if NewYork court doesn't have jurisdiction, the California court doesn't havejurisdiction, I am gonna keep kids here. A New York court immediately the, sheshowed up with the kids nearby and she send the kids back. this is the whole,she kidnapped the kids. she made an announcement that she was reluctant to sendthe kids back. A court says send the kids back. she sends the kids back. andnow it seems they may never be able to come back until they are adults.And children are so much older now, they know what's going on.Absolutely. And it takes so long. And thatfundamentally changes things in cases like this.
                                                   
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
立即获取| 免费注册领取外教体验课一节
HOMEWORK

On that devastating defeat for Kelly Rutherford in her bitter custody battle, a judge has ruled that she can only visit her kids in Monaco or France. Rutherford is not done fighting.

“Thanks a lot.”

“Thank you.”

Kelly Rutherford has been banned from bringing her kids home to the United States. It's a crushing blow in her highly publicized 6-year globe-spanning custody battle for her two children with the ex-husband German businessman Daniel Giersch who's lived with their children in Monaco and France since 2012. According to court documents a Monaco judge ruled Tuesday that “the quote habitual residence of the minor children is fixed at the residence of Giersch while Rutherford can visit her children exclusively in France and Monaco.

“No words at this moment.”

In August a New York judge ruled the children be returned to their father after Rutherford disobeyed a Monaco court order to send them back to Europe as part of a custody agreement. We spoke to her just days after.

“This was the first five weeks I've had with my kids straight in six years.”

Rutherford and her lawyer maintained that the children were only supposed to live in Europe temporarily while their father worked to acquire a current visa.

“For three years he did nothing. He violated his agreement. No American court seems to give it a damn.”

Rutherford and hey attorney say courts in both California and New York where she lived with the children have relinquished jurisdiction to courts in Monaco.

And Dan Abrams is back right now. You've been following this case for years. Is this it?

Well, she's still gonna appeal in Monaco but she’s got an uphill battle. Look, don't blame Monaco on this. This is really California's fault. 2012, 2013 California says we are gonna send the kids to Monaco temporarily because his visa was revoked. We want him to have access to the kids. They say “Don't worry, we're retaining jurisdiction here. We are gonna put all sorts of rules and regulations about what's going to happen. He’s gonna have to try to get a visa to come back here and then it's all gonna happen back in the United States. A couple years later they go back to California. Kelly Rutherford says he's not following the rules -- you said you were jurisdiction. California court says: “Well, you know what? Kids don't live here anymore. You don't live here anymore. The father doesn't live here anymore so…”

Perfectly predictable.

“…we don’t have duty…exact…California courts set this up. So, so the bottom line is, don't blame Monaco because for Monaco's perspective the kids had been living there for two or three years.

But did anything she did make it worse for her?

Well, there's no question that the Monaco court is using against her the fact that the last time the kids came to the United States, she announced that she wasn't gonna send them back. Why? Because she said: “Look, if the New York court doesn't have jurisdiction and the California court doesn't have jurisdiction, I'm gonna keep the kids here. A New York court immediately hauled her in the court. She showed up with the kids nearby and she sent the kids back. This is the whole claim she kidnapped the kids. She made an announcement that she was, that she was reluctant to send the kids back. A court says send the kids back. She sends the kids back and now it seems they may never be able to come back until they are adults.

But children are so much older now. They know what's going on.

Absolutely.

It’s taken so long.

And that fundamentally changes things in cases like this.

Yeah.

Ok.

All right. Thanks, Dan.
返回列表