[Ó¢Â×¹ã½Ç] 2016-08-13 Ó¢¹ú²»¹Ë¿¹Òé Åú×¼¿±Ì½Ô¼¿Ë¿¤Ò³ÑÒÆø

qingchengshan

Fracking Cash: People 'Will Turn On Each Other'


Campaigners fear government payments to those affected by fracking could divide communities in places like Yorkshire.

¡¾µçÐÅ1¡¿ RealVideo / mp3

¡¾µçÐÅ2¡¿ RealVideo / mp3

¡¾Íøͨ/½ÌÓýÍø¡¿ RealVideo / mp3

µã»÷½øÈëÓ¢Â×¹ã½ÇÕûÀí¸å»ã×ÜÒ³Ãæ

µã»÷½øÈë¶àÖ÷Ìâ°æ¿éÌýд¹æÔò(ÐÂÊֱضÁ) ¡£

°æÖ÷Ìáʾ:
Ò»¡¢ÈôÊÇ×Ô¼ºµÄÌýд¸å, Çë·¢Ìûʱ±ê×¢'Homework'.
¶þ¡¢ÈôÊǸĸå, Çë·¢Ìûʱ±ê×¢'on ijijÈË'²¢ÔÚÐ޸Ĵ¦±êºì.
Èý¡¢ÎªÁË´ïµ½×î¿ìµÄÏÂÔØËÙ¶È,ÍƼöʹÓÃѸÀ׸ßËÙÏÂÔر¾Õ¾ÒôƵ/ÊÓƵ²ÄÁÏ.

xingxingcamille

HOMEWORK

A generous windfall sharing the profits of fracking or a cynical bribe to buy off opponents? As fracking faces more protests and legal challenges in areas like North Yorkshire, Theresa May is promising cash handouts direct to residents affected. Until now the government was proposing to share the proceeds of shale gas only with community trusts or councils. Speaking ahead of a consultation on the plans, the Prime Minister said: ¡°It¡¯s about making sure people personally benefit from economic decisions that are taken - not just councils - and putting them back in control over their lives.¡±

Last week the Prime Minister delayed approving the new 18 billion pounds Hinkley nuclear power station in Somerset because of concerns over Chinese involvement and about value for money for taxpayers and energy consumers.

¡°Nobody can say that Theresa May hasn¡¯t been bold on energy policies since becoming Prime Minister. In just a few short weeks, she scrubbed the Energy and Climate Change Department, slammed the breaks on Hinkely, and now she¡¯s launching her shale gas shakeup.¡±

Fracking involves drilling deep into the earth, injecting shale rock with a high pressure mixture of water, sand and chemicals to release the gas inside. Estimates suggest there could be as much as 1,300 trillion cubic feet of shale gas under the north of England, providing more than 500 years of gas supply for the U.K. Supporters claim that post Bexit, the falling pound makes it more expensive to import gas and boost the case for a reliable supply of low-cost shale gas. But opponents say it¡¯s dangerous because it requires huge amounts of water, causes pollution and earth trimmers. And they dismiss the P.M.¡¯s cash offer as a bribe.

¡°I¡¯m only in favor of subsidizing people to encourage them to do the right thing. And the trouble with fracking the shale gas is that it¡¯s not clear that it is the right thing. And maybe that¡¯s the reason that the government feels that they have to try to incentivize people to do it.¡±

But the Prime Minister who says she wants to apply this approach to other government programs in future is clearly hoping that putting shale gas cash in people¡¯s pockets will be persuasive in the battle over fracking.

Jon Craig, Sky News.

ISO-Auditor

A generous windfall sharing the profits of fracking or a cynical bribe to buy off opponents? As fracking faces more protests and legal challenges in areas like North Yorkshire, Theresa May is promising cash handouts direct to residents affected. Until now the government was proposing to share the proceeds of shale gas only with community trusts or councils. Speaking ahead of a consultation on the plans, the Prime Minister said: ¡°It¡¯s about making sure people personally benefit from economic decisions that are taken - not just councils - and putting them back in control over their lives.¡±

Last week the Prime Minister delayed approving the new 18 billion pounds Hinkley nuclear power station in Somerset because of concerns over Chinese involvement and about value for money for taxpayers and energy consumers.

¡°Nobody can say that Theresa May hasn¡¯t been bold on energy policies since becoming Prime Minister. In just a few short weeks, she scrubbed the Energy in Climate Change Department, slammed the breaks on Hinkely, and now she¡¯s launching her shale gas shakeup.¡±

Fracking involves drilling deep into the earth, injecting shale rock with a high pressure mixture of water, sand and chemicals to release the gas inside. Estimates suggest there could be as much as 1,300 trillion cubic feet of shale gas under the north of England, providing more than 500 years of gas supply for the U.K. Supporters claim that post Bexit, the falling pound makes it more expensive to import gas and boost the case for a reliable supply of low-cost shale gas. But opponents say it¡¯s dangerous because it requires huge amounts of water, causes pollution and earth tremors. And they dismiss the P.M.¡¯s cash offer as a bribe.

¡°I¡¯m only in favor of subsidizing people to encourage them to do the right thing. And the trouble with fracking the shale gas is that it¡¯s not clear that introdues the right thing. And maybe that¡¯s the reason that the government feels that they have to try to incentivize people to do it.¡±

But the Prime Minister who says she wants to apply this approach to other government programs in future is clearly hoping that putting shale gas cash in people¡¯s pockets will be persuasive in the battle over fracking.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

zq821058

it's not clear that is is the right thing.

xiaojuebo

A generous windfall  sharing the profits of fracking  or cynical  bribe to buy off opponents. As fracking are facing more protests and legal challenges and in area like North Yorkshire  ,Theresa May  is promising cash handouts direct to  residents affected. Until now the government  lost the proposal to share proceeds of shale gas only with community trusts or cancels . Speaking ahead of the consultation on the plans, the prime minister said it's about making sure people personally benefit  from economic decision of that taken not just councils, and putting their back in control of their lives.

Last week the Prime minister delayed the approving the new 18 billion pounds Hinkey  nuclear power station in summer set . Because of concern of Chinese involvement and about value for money for tax payer and energy consumers.


Nobody can  say that   Theresa May hasn't been bold on energy policies since  becoming prime minister in just few short week she  scraped the energy in climate change of department, slammed  the break in `Hinkely, now she  is launching her  shale gas shakeup .


Fracking  involve trillion deep into the earth , injecting  shale rock without higher pressure mixture of water ,sand ,chemical ,to release the gas inside , estimate  suggest it could be much 1300 trillion cubic feet of  shale gas on the the north of England,providing more than 500 years of gas supply for the UK. Supporter claim the pros breath , the falling pound makes more expensive import gas , and boost the case for reliable supply of local shalel gas, but the opponent say it's dangerous because it require huge amounts of the water cause it's pollution and earth tremors and they dismiss the PM' cash off as a bribe  , I'm only  favor the subsidizing  the people to encourage them to do the right thing and trouble with the fracking in shale  gas is that it is not  clear it is right thing. And it Maybe that is the reason the government feel that they have to try them incentivize the people to do it. But prime minister who say she want to apply this approach other  government  program in future is clearly hoping to putting the show gas cash in people's pockets would be persuasive  in the black of fracking .

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!