gz110

They are also demanding the release of the full Muller report .

fleizhang

Opposition democrab want to know more about mola's focus on subsjection of justice. There are also demanding the release of the full male report. House Judicary committe chairman Jerad Nadman Nedler. His conclusion raises more questions and answer, given the fact that the malelan confidence that his words only doesn't exsanorate the president. Molar decision not to offer an opoion on the obstraction is significant since former procequter Prebalala. It was very close case but more dicide not to make the termiantion by what not charged could be broad and only do that for substantial evidence of construction.
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check [url=http://home.putclub.com/listen.php?url=http://download.putclub.com/newupdate/jwj/jjt/2019.4.9VOA3.mp3&subject=VOA鏍囧噯绮剧簿鍚

mcliuliu

__. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, His conclusions raise more questions than the answer, given the fact that Muller uncovered evidence that in his own words does not exonerate the president. Muller’s decision not to offer an opinion on obstruction is significant since former federal prosecutor Preet Bharara, It was very close case, by more decided not to make a determination about whether or not a c

何必相逢

  Opposition Democrats want to know more about Muller’s focus on obstruction(obstructions  n.阻碍） of justice.  _They are also demand in the release of the four Muller's reports. .___________________________________. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler, His conclusions raise more questions than the answer, given the fact that Muller uncovered evidence that in his own words does not exonerate（v.免除责任 n.免罪） the president. Muller’s decision not to offer an opinion on obstruction is significant since former federal prosecutor Preet Bharara, It was very close case, by more decided not to make a determination about whether or not a charge could be brought, and you only do that if there’s substantial (adj. 大量的）evidence of.反对派民主党想更多地了解穆勒对于阻碍司法进程一事的关注。_____________________________________。众议院司法委员会主席杰诺德·纳德勒表示，穆勒的报告没回答几个问题，反而让疑点更多了。因为有一个事实是：穆勒揭开的证据用他自己的话来说是无法让特朗普开脱的。穆勒决定不就是否妨碍司法进程发表意见，这个决定很重要，因为前联邦检察官普里特·巴拉拉认为，这个案子很模棱两可，更多人还是认为不应该起诉特朗普，因为没有充足的证据。初二学生，水平不高……  ：）

跳跳快走

Opposition democrats want to know more about the Muller's focus on the obstruction of  justice.There are also demanding the release of the full Muller report. House judiciary Committee chairman Jerrold Nadler, its conclusions raise more questions than the answer, giving the fact that Muller the evidents that in his own words does not exonerate the president. Muller's decision's not to offer an opinion on the instruciton is significant since former federal prosecutor  Preet Bharara. It was very close case, but Muller decided not to make the determination by whether or not a charge could be brought. And you only do that if there is any substantial evidence of the obstruction.

反对派民主党想更多地了解穆勒对于阻碍司法进程一事的关注。_____________________________________。众议院司法委员会主席杰诺德·纳德勒表示，穆勒的报告没回答几个问题，反而让疑点更多了。因为有一个事实是：穆勒揭开的证据用他自己的话来说是无法让特朗普开脱的。穆勒决定不就是否妨碍司法进程发表意见，这个决定很重要，因为前联邦检察官普里特·巴拉拉认为，这个案子很模棱两可，更多人还是认为不应该起诉特朗普，因为没有充足的证据。




house judiciary committee 司法委员会
/ɪg'zɒnəreɪt/   exonerate  vt. 使免罪,免除n. 免罪,免除adj. 免罪的,免除的


This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check [url=http://home.putclub.com/listen.php?url=http://download.putclub.com/newupdate/jwj/jjt/2019.4.9VOA3.mp3&subject=VOA鏍囧噯绮剧簿鍚