只用一本书提高英语听力能力!重温经典名著双语阅读小编推荐:跟着纪录片学英语不背单词和语法,轻松学英语
返回列表 回复 发帖

[英伦广角] 【整理】2009-03-29 首相提议英王室修改继承法

提高英语听力能力 找对方法很重要!

[英伦广角] 【整理】2009-03-29 首相提议英王室修改继承法

提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽

普特在线文本比较普特在线听音查字普特在线拼写检查普特文本转音频

 

HW

Prince Charles on royal duty at Buckingham Palace save in the knowledge that even if the rules on the succession and royal marriage are drafted in the 21st century, he’ll still get to be king. Princes William and Harry too are save being the packing order though it stands at the moment neither of them could hold on to their chances of becoming Monique if they married a Catholic though that too may be about to change.

 

It’s very simple to overcome the anti-Catholic legislation. You just have to repeal the words or marry a Catholic or a Papist or similar words to do with the popish print.

 

The queen wouldn’t be the queen if the new proposals had been reinforced at the time of her great great grandmother Queen Victoria. Buckingham Palace would now be home to princess / or Queen / so she could presumably be known.

 

Removing the men-only succession rule would have a startling effect on the current royal line. As it stands now, Princess Ann and her children Peter and Zara are numbers 10, 11 and 12 respectively. And female royal children will be given equal status and Peter and Zara leapfrog princess Andrew and Edward and their children to take up positions 4, 5 and 6.

 

 

In fact Peter Philips and his wife also would be double winners under the new plan because she wouldn’t have had to announce her Catholic faith as she did in order for Peter to keep his place in the succession line.

 

… begs the question: Why is this debate going on now? The answer, according to Royal commentator Alastair Bruce, lies with the queen herself.

 

The Palace hasn’t set the timing here, but 1701 is a long time ago and they need to bring it up to date. Let’s get the legislation down and as far as the queen and Palace are concerned, it is probably good to get it down now. Her Majesty is very popular. Prince of Wales wants to be dealing with this one when he is king, a nova prince William. Get it down now.

 

We are long way from ditch in more than 300 years of royal history and rewritng the 1701 Act of Settlement which governs who can be our king or queen. But the winds of change are certainly blowing through the corridors of the House of Windsor.

 

Sky News at Windsor Castle.

1

评分次数

立即获取| 免费注册领取外教体验课一节

HW

Prince Charles on royal duty in Buckingham palace save its knowledge of rules of succession and royal marriage and drive the marriage of 21st century, he'll still get to be king. Prince William and Harry were safe in the packing order. As it stands the moment, Neither of them could hold on the chances of becoming the monarch if they married a Catholic. Those attitudes may not to be changed. It's very simple to overcome the anti-catholic legislation you just have to repeal the words, or marry a Cathlic or peipest and simlpest to do the Pope's prince. The queen wouldn't be a queen if the new proposal will be in force at the time of the great grand mother Victoria Bucking in palace faliciltize pressure .Removing the succession rule will have a startling effect on the current royal line. As it stands now, Princess Allen and her children Piz and numbers 10, 11,and 12 respectively. A female's children will given equal statues, and Peter and Zara equals for Princess Angelar and Edward and their children to take up their positions for 5 and 6. In fact, Peter and his new wife will be the double winners onto the new plan, because she wouldn't renounce her catholic faith she did,you know for Peter to keep his place on the succession line. Overb the question why is the debate going on now? The answer according to royal commentant A.Bruce, Lie in the Queen herself. The palace has set the time 701 years ago, a long time ago, they need to bring it up to date,that is get the legislation done, as far as the Queen and the palace's concern, it is probably good to get it done now.Her majesty is very popular and Prince Wills will not want to deal with the king over Pince William go down.We are long way from the teaching the 300 year history and rewriting the 701 settlement, which governing will a king or queen. but the wings of changes are certainly blowing to the corridor of the house of Windsor.
实现无障碍英语沟通

On myself

 

Prince Charles on royal duty at Buckingham Palace save in the knowledge that even if the rules on the succession and royal marriage are drafted in the 21st century, he’ll still get to be king. Princes William and Harry too are save being the packing order though it stands at the moment neither of them could hold on to their chances of becoming monarch if they married a Catholic though that too may be about to change.

 

It’s very simple to overcome the anti-Catholic legislation. You just have to repeal the words or marry a Catholic or a Papist or similar words to do with the popish print.

 

The queen wouldn’t be the queen if the new proposals had been reinforced at the time of her great great grandmother Queen Victoria. Buckingham Palace would now be home to princess Felicitas of Prussia or Queen Felicitas so she could presumably be known.

 

Removing the men-only succession rule would have a startling effect on the current royal line. As it stands now, Princess Ann and her children Peter and Zara are numbers 10, 11 and 12 respectively. And female royal children will be given equal status and Peter and Zara leapfrog princess Andrew and Edward and their children to take up positions 4, 5 and 6.

 

 

In fact Peter Philips and his wife also would be double winners under the new plan because she wouldn’t have had to renounce her Catholic faith as she did in order for Peter to keep his place in the succession line.

 

… begs the question: Why is this debate going on now? The answer, according to Royal commentator Alastair Bruce, lies with the queen herself.

 

The Palace hasn’t set the timing here, but 1701 is a long time ago and they need to bring it up to date. Let’s get the legislation down and as far as the queen and Palace are concerned, it is probably good to get it down now. Her Majesty is very popular. Prince of Wales wants to be dealing with this one when he is king, a nova prince William. Get it down now.

 

We are long way from ditch in more than 300 years of royal history and rewritng the 1701 Act of Settlement which governs who can be our king or queen. But the winds of change are certainly blowing through the corridors of the House of Windsor.

 

Sky News at Windsor Castle.

1

评分次数

口译专员推荐—>口译训练软件IPTAM口译通

hw

Prince Charles on royal’s duty at Buckingham Palace safe in the knowledge that he needs the rule on succession and royal marriage drafted in 21st century, he will still get to be king. Prince William and Henry, too, will safe in the picking order. There was an extend the moment that neither of them could hold on to their chance of becoming a monarch if they marry a Catholic. Those are two about to be changed. 

 

“It’s very simple to overcome, en, the anti-Catholic legislation. You just have to repeal the words, or marry a Catholic, or a papist, and similar words to do with papist prints.

 

The queen wouldn’t be the queen if the new proposal has been enforced at the time of her great-grandmother Queen Vitoria. Buckingham Palace would now be home to Princess // of Prussia or Queen//as she will presumably be known.

 

Removing the men on succession rule would have a starting effect on the current royal line. As it stands now, Princess Anne, her children, Peter and Zara are number’s 10, 11 and 12 respectively. If female royal children would be given equal status, and Peter and Zara lick for Prince Andrew and Edward and their children to take up positions 4, 5 and 6.

 

In fact, Peter Philip and his wife Autumn would be double winners under the new plan because she wouldn’t have to renounce her Catholic faith as she did in order for Peter to keep his place in the succession line.

 

All which backs the question, “why is the debate going on now?” The answer according to royal commenter //, lies with the queen herself.

 

“The palace haven’t set the timing here. But 1701 is a long time ago and they need to bring it up to date. Let’s get legislation done and as far as the queen and Palace’s concern, it’s probably good to get it done now. // very popular. The Prince of Wales would not want to deal with it when he is the king and nor will Prince William. Get it done now.”

 

We are long way from ditching more 300 years of royal history and rewriting the 1701 act of settlement which governs who can be our king or queen. But the winds have changed a certain blowing for the corridors of the House of Windsor. /Sky news at the Windsor Castle.

ON 一叶星空

Prince Charles on royal’s duty at Buckingham Palace safe in the knowledge that he needs the rule on succession and royal marriage drafted in 21st century, he will still get to be king. Prince William and Henry, too, will safe in the picking order. There was an extend the moment that neither of them could hold on to their chance of becoming a monarch if they marry a Catholic. Those are two about to be changed. 

 

“It’s very simple to overcome, en, the anti-Catholic legislation. You just have to repeal the words, or marry a Catholic, or a papist, and similar words to do with papist prints.

 

The queen wouldn’t be the queen if the new proposal has been enforced at the time of her great-grandmother Queen Vitoria. Buckingham Palace would now be home to Princess Felicitas of Prussia or Queen  Felicitas  as she will presumably be known.

 

Removing the men on succession rule would have a starting effect on the current royal line. As it stands now, Princess Anne, her children, Peter and Zara are number’s 10, 11 and 12 respectively. If female royal children would be given equal status, and Peter and Zara lick for Prince Andrew and Edward and their children to take up positions 4, 5 and 6.

 

In fact, Peter Philip and his wife Autumn would be double winners under the new plan because she wouldn’t have to renounce her Catholic faith as she did in order for Peter to keep his place in the succession line.

 

All which backs the question, “why is the debate going on now?” The answer according to royal  commentator Alastair Bruce

“The palace haven’t set the timing here. But 1701 is a long time ago and they need to bring it up to date. Let’s get legislation done and as far as the queen and Palace’s concern, it’s probably good to get it done now. Her Majesty is  very popular. The Prince of Wales would not want to deal with it when he is the king and nor will Prince William. Get it done now.”

 

We are long way from ditching more 300 years of royal history and rewriting the 1701 act of settlement which governs who can be our king or queen. But the winds have changed a certain blowing for the corridors of the House of Windsor. Sky news at the Windsor Castle

To be , or not to be,  just in your mind.
NO money , no bread .

hw

Prince Charles on royal duty of Buckingham Palace safe in the knowledge that if he wins the rules on succession and royal marriage dragged the 21st century,he will still get to be king.


Princes William and Henry too are safe in the pecking order.There will at an extend at the moment either of them could hold on to their chances to become monarch if they married a Catholic though that too may be about to change.


It's very simple to overcome the anti-Catholic legislation,you just have to repeal the words or marry a Catholic or a papist or had a similar words to do with the pope's prince.


The queen wouldn't be the queen if the new proposal had been enforced at her great great grandmother Queen Victoria.Buckingham Palace would not be home to princess Felicitas of Prussia or queen Felicitas that she would presumably be known.Removing the man that's only succession rule would have a startling effect on the current royal line.As it stands now,princess Anne and his children Peter and Zara are numbers 10,11 and 12 respectively if female royal children would give an equal status.Anne,Peter and Zara / princess Andrew and Edward and their children to take a position of 4,5 and 6.


In fact Peter Philip and his wife also would be double winners under the new plan because she wouldn't have to be announced a Catholic faith if she did in order for Peter to keep his place in a succession line.All this begs a question:Why is this debate going on now?The answer according to royal commentator /Bruce lies with the queen herself.


The palace hasn't set the timing here but 1701 is long time ago,and they need to bring it up to date.Let's get the legislation down and as far as the queen and the palace's concern it's probably good to get it done now.Her majesty is very popular,Prince Wales wanted to be deal with this when he is king,a noval prince William,get it done now.


We are all long way from ditching more than 300 years royal history and rewriting the 1701 act of settlement which governs who can be our king or queen.But the winds of change are certainly blowing for the corridors of the house of Windsor.
David Bowden,Sky news,at Windsor Castle.

 

自信源于内心的强大

I can't imagine it any other way. A world without you is only wasted space.
实现无障碍英语沟通

On 新手报到 4#




Prince Charles on royal duty of Buckingham Palace save in the knowledge that even if the rules on the succession and royal marriage are dragged in the 21st century, he’ll still get to be king. 


Princes William and Harry too are save in the pecking order, though it stands at the moment neither of them could hold on to their chances of becoming monarch if they married a Catholic. Those are too may be about to change.

 

"It’s very simple to overcome the anti-Catholic legislation. You just have to repeal the words or marry a Catholic or a Papist or (and) similar words to do with the popish prince."

 

The Queen wouldn’t be the Queen if the new proposals had been enforced at the time of her great great grandmother Queen Victoria. Buckingham Palace would now be home to Princess Felicitas of Prussia or Queen Felicitas so she wouldn't presumably be known.

 

Removing the men-only succession rule would have a startling effect on the current royal line. As it stands now, Princess Anne and her children Peter and Zara are numbers 10, 11 and 12 respectively. If female royal children will be given equal status, and Peter and Zara leapfrog Princes Andrew and Edward and their children to take up positions 4, 5 and 6.


In fact Peter Philips and his wife also would be double winners under the new plan, because she wouldn’t have / to renounce her Catholic faith as she did in order for Peter to keep his place in the succession line.

 

All of which begs the question: Why is this debate going on now? The answer, according to Royal commentator Alastair Bruce, lies with the Queen herself.

 

"The Palace hasn’t set the timing here, but 1701 is a long time ago and they need to bring it up to date. Let’s get the legislation done and as far as the Queen and Palace are concerned, it is probably good to get it done now. Her Majesty is very popular. Prince of Wales will not want to be dealing with this / when he is king, and nor will Prince William. Get it done now."

 

We are long way from ditching more than 300 years of royal history and rewritng the 1701 Act of Settlement which governs who can be our king or queen. But the winds of change are certainly blowing through the corridors of the House of Windsor.

 

David BowdenSky News, at Windsor Castle.

1

评分次数

  • 北星束

普特听力大课堂

on Phantom932

Prince Charles on royal duty of Buckingham Palace,safe in the knowledge that even if the rules on the succession and royal marriage are dragged in the 21st century, he’ll still get to be king. 


Princes William and Harry too are safe in the pecking order, though it stands at the moment neither of them could hold on to their chances of becoming monarch if they married a Catholic though that too may be about to change.

 

"It’s very simple to overcome the anti-Catholic legislation. You just have to repeal the words or marry a Catholic or a Papist or (and) similar words to do with the popish prince."

 

The Queen wouldn’t be the Queen if the new proposals had been enforced at the time of her great great grandmother Queen Victoria. Buckingham Palace would now be home to Princess Felicitas of Prussia or Queen Felicitas so she wouldn't presumably be known.

 

Removing the men-only succession rule would have a startling effect on the current royal line. As it stands now, Princess Anne and her children Peter and Zara are numbers 10, 11 and 12 respectively. If female royal children will be given equal status, and Peter and Zara leapfrog Princes Andrew and Edward and their children to take up positions 4, 5 and 6.


In fact Peter Philips and his wife also would be double winners under the new plan, because she wouldn’t have to renounce her Catholic faith as she did in order for Peter to keep his place in the succession line.

 

All of which begs the question: Why is this debate going on now? The answer, according to Royal commentator Alastair Bruce, lies with the Queen herself.

 

"The Palace hasn’t set the timing here, but 1701 is a long time ago and they need to bring it up to date. Let’s get the legislation done and as far as the Queen and Palace are concerned, it is probably good to get it done now. Her Majesty is very popular. Prince of Wales will not want to be dealing with this when he is king, and nor will Prince William. Get it done now."

 

We are long way from ditching more than 300 years of royal history and rewritng the 1701 Act of Settlement which governs who can be our king or queen. But the winds of change are certainly blowing through the corridors of the House of Windsor.

 

David BowdenSky News, at Windsor Castle.

 

safe in the knowledge that:Knowing that sth has happened or is true.心中有数

[ 本帖最后由 sophiaxd 于 2009-3-29 19:47 编辑 ]
1

评分次数

自信源于内心的强大

I can't imagine it any other way. A world without you is only wasted space.
好栏目推荐之美国口语俚语

on sophiaxd

 

Prince Charles on royal duty of Buckingham Palace,safe in the knowledge that even if the rules on the succession and royal marriage are dragged in the 21st century, he’ll still get to be king. 


Princes William and Harry too are safe in the pecking order, though it stands at the moment neither of them could hold on to their chances of becoming monarch if they married a Catholic though that too may be about to change.

 

"It’s very simple to overcome the anti-Catholic legislation. You just have to repeal the words or marry a Catholic or a Papist or (and) similar words to do with the popish prince."

 

The Queen wouldn’t be the Queen if the new proposals had been enforced at the time of her great great grandmother Queen Victoria. Buckingham Palace would now be home to Princess Felicitas of Prussia or Queen Felicitas so she wouldn't presumably be known.

 

Removing the men-only succession rule would have a startling effect on the current royal line. As it stands now, Princess Anne and her children Peter and Zara are numbers 10, 11 and 12 respectively. If female royal children will be given equal status, and Peter and Zara leapfrog Princes Andrew and Edward and their children to take up positions 4, 5 and 6.


In fact Peter Philips and his wife Autumn would be double winners under the new plan, because she wouldn’t have to renounce her Catholic faith as she did in order for Peter to keep his place in the succession line.

 

All of which begs the question: Why is this debate going on now? The answer, according to Royal commentator Alastair Bruce, lies with the Queen herself.

 

"The Palace hasn’t set the timing here, but 1701 is a long time ago and they need to bring it up to date. Let’s get the legislation done and as far as the Queen and Palace are concerned, it is probably good to get it done now. Her Majesty is very popular. Prince of Wales will not want to be dealing with this when he is king, and nor will Prince William. Get it done now."

 

We are long way from ditching more than 300 years of royal history and rewritng the 1701 Act of Settlement which governs who can be our king or queen. But the winds of change are certainly blowing through the corridors of the House of Windsor.

 

David BowdenSky News, at Windsor Castle.

 

请教一下sophiaxd, 你是光凭耳朵听就拼出 ‘Felicitas of Prussia ’的吗?每次看你做HW的速度奇快,佩服!可以问一下你花了多长时间练到现在的程度吗?听写的时候也用听写软件吗?还是凭记忆听写?我不是英语专业的,只能利用边边角角的业余时间来练习,总感觉没有指望达到你们这样的高度。非常感激其他普特高人也参与回答。感谢!

1

评分次数

  • 北星束

 回复Walkure:呵呵,我水平也不行。普特高手好多噢。一些地名人名我也都是GOOGLE 出来的,听不出也不知道的。是用复读软件的。在这里可以和大家一块学习进步,蛮好的哈。
自信源于内心的强大

I can't imagine it any other way. A world without you is only wasted space.

homework

Prince Charles on royal duty at Buckingham Palace,safe in the knowledge that even if the rules on the succession and royal marriage are dragged in the 21st century, he’ll still get to be king. Princes William and Harry too are safe in the pecking order, though it stands at the moment neither of them could hold on to their chances of becoming monarch if they married a Catholic though that too, may be about to change. "It's very simple to overcome the anti-Catholic legislation. You just have to repeal the words or marry a Catholic or a Papist or (and) similar words to do with the popish print." The Queen wouldn’t be the Queen if the new proposals had been enforced at the time of her great great grandmother Queen Victoria. Buckingham Palace would now be home to Princess Felicitas of Prussia or Queen Felicitas as she would presumably be known. Removing the men-only succession rule would have a startling effect on the current royal line. As it stands now, Princess Anne and her children Peter and Zara are numbers 10, 11 and 12 respectively. If female royal children were given equal status, and Peter and Zara will leapfrog Princes Andrew and Edward, and their children to take up positions 4, 5 and 6. In fact Peter Philips and his wife Autumn would be double winners under the new plan, because she wouldn’t have to renounce her Catholic faith as she did in order for Peter to keep his place in the succession line. All which begs the question: Why is this debate going on now? The answer, according to Royal commentator Alastair Bruce, lies with the Queen herself. "The Palace hasn’t set the timing here, but 1701 is a long time ago and they need to bring it up to date. Let’s get the legislation done and as far as the Queen and Palace are concerned, it is probably good to get it done now. Her Majesty is very popular. Prince of Wales will not want to be doing with this when he is king, and nor will Prince William. Get it done now." We are long way from ditching more than 300 years of royal history and rewritng the 1701 Act of Settlement, which governs who can be our king or queen. But the winds of change are certainly blowing through the corridors of the House of Windsor. David Bowden, Sky News, at Windsor Castle.
狗是我们与天堂的联结。它们不懂何为邪恶、嫉妒、不满。在美丽的黄昏,和狗儿并肩坐在河边,有如重回伊甸园.即使什么事也不做也不觉得无聊——只有幸福平和.
平安阿福流浪动物救助会·平安阿福动物医院
域名: http://pingan.xici.net
每天半小时 轻松提高英语口语

on Walkure

Prince Charles on royal duty at Buckingham Palace, safe in the knowledge that even if the rules on the succession and royal marriage are dragged in the 21st century, he’ll still get to be king. 

 

Princes William and Harry too are safe in the pecking order, though it stands at the moment neither of them could hold on to their chances of becoming monarch if they married a Catholic though that too may be about to change.

 

"It’s very simple to overcome the anti-Catholic legislation. You just have to repeal the words or marry a Catholic or a Papist or (and) similar words to do with the popish prince."

 

The Queen wouldn’t be the Queen if the new proposals had been enforced at the time of her great, great grandmother Queen Victoria. Buckingham Palace would now be home to Princess Felicitas of Prussia or Queen Felicitas so she wouldn't presumably be known.

 

Removing the men-only succession rule would have a startling effect on the current royal line. As it stands now, Princess Anne and her children Peter and Zara are numbers 10, 11 and 12 respectively. If female royal children will be given equal status, and Peter and Zara leapfrog Princes Andrew and Edward and their children to take up positions 4, 5 and 6.

 

In fact Peter Philips and his wife Autumn would be double winners under the new plan, because she wouldn’t have to renounce her Catholic faith as she did in order for Peter to keep his place in the succession line.

 

All of which begs the question: Why is this debate going on now? The answer, according to Royal commentator Alastair Bruce, lies with the Queen herself.

 

"The Palace hasn’t set the timing here, but 1701 is a long time ago and they need to bring it up to date. Let’s get the legislation done and as far as the Queen and Palace are concerned, it is probably good to get it done now. Her Majesty is very popular. Prince of Wales will not want to be dealing with this when he is king, and nor will Prince William. Get it done now."

 

We are a long way from ditching more than 300 years of royal history and rewriting the 1701 Act of Settlement which governs who can be our king or queen. But the winds of change are certainly blowing through the corridors of the House of Windsor.

 

David Bowden, Sky News, at Windsor Castle.

 

 

回复 11# 的帖子

Thank sophiaxd! Thank all friends in putclub.
口译专员推荐—>口译训练软件IPTAM口译通

on 1047440431

   Prince Charles on royal duty at Buckingham Palace, safe in the knowledge that even if the rules on the succession and royal marriage are dragged into the 21st century, he’ll still get to be king.

 

Princes William and Harry too are safe in the pecking order, though it stands at the moment neither of them could hold on to their chances of becoming monarch if they married a Catholic though that too may be about to change.

 

"It’s very simple to overcome the anti-Catholic legislation. You just have to repeal the words or marry a Catholic or a Papist or (and) similar words to do with the popish prince."

 

The Queen wouldn’t be the Queen if the new proposals had been enforced at the time of her great, great grandmother Queen Victoria. Buckingham Palace would now be home to Princess Felicitas of Prussia or Queen Felicitas so she wouldn't presumably be known.

 

Removing the men-only succession rule would have a startling effect on the current royal line. As it stands now, Princess Anne and her children Peter and Zara are numbers 10, 11 and 12 respectively. If female royal children will be given equal status, and Peter and Zara leapfrog Princes Andrew and Edward and their children to take up positions 4, 5 and 6.

 

In fact Peter Philips and his wife Autumn would be double winners under the new plan, because she wouldn’t have had to renounce her Catholic faith as she did in order for Peter to keep his place in the succession line.

 

All of which begs the question: Why is this debate going on now? The answer, according to Royal commentator Alastair Bruce, lies with the Queen herself.

 

"The Palace hasn’t set the timing here, but 1701 is a long time ago and they need to bring it up to date. Let’s get the legislation done and as far as the Queen and Palace are concerned, it is probably good to get it done now. Her Majesty is very popular. Prince of Wales will not want to be dealing with this when he is king, and nor will Prince William. Get it done now."

 

We are a long way from ditching more than 300 years of royal history and rewriting the 1701 Act of Settlement which governs who can be our king or queen. But the winds of change are certainly blowing through the corridors of the House of Windsor.

 

David Bowden, Sky News, at Windsor Castle.

 

国家地理最新专题: 鲨鱼湾的海豚 The Dolphins of Shark Bay |欢迎参与听写!<=点击这里
国家地理National Geographic 2005 2006 2007 2008 整理汇总<=点击这里
请遵守阶梯改稿规则 | 贴完整听写稿 | 鼓励多改稿,多头贴:-)
听写版面拒绝广告及灌水 |  谢谢配合|欢迎常来自然百科!
返回列表