只用一本书提高英语听力能力!重温经典名著双语阅读小编推荐:跟着纪录片学英语不背单词和语法,轻松学英语
返回列表 回复 发帖

[访谈录] 【整理】2009-11-20&11-22 奥巴马答CNN观众问

提高英语听力能力 找对方法很重要!
我是奥巴马的粉丝。
HW
We received a lot of questions from CNN Ireporters so went to our website they want to ask you questions directly. This is one of them from G W in A.
My question is why you have chosen to give our tax money to the banks without holding them responsible or forcing them to lower their rates for start-ups and to facilitate refinancing for closing homes.
You hear that a lot.
I do. I think it's important to understand first of all that the so called bank bailout started before we came in. actually I think the right thing to do in a crisis we had to make sure that you didn’t ever complete well,which  would be even worse. And I have said in past I supported president Bush’s decision to move forward on that. Once we got them in a place where there were no longer a crisis. The problem was things were put together so quickly in last year that the one may have been strengthen attached as we would liked. So what we’ve tried to do is to create some structures after the fact that would impose more accountability, more discipline and the most obvious example would be the rules on  executive pay. But it’s always hard to do particularly when allow the banks now to get well and they just paid the money back. So we no longer have leverage. This is why I think it’s so important moving forward to make sure that we got a financial regulatory framework that protects consumers, make sure they will not get .. , make sure that there is a lot of clarity in terms of mortgages they are getting. In the mean time, just on the emergency basis, we are trying to do everything we can to poke prod in santalize banks to help responsible homeowners who do no fault to their finding very tough for them to pay for the mortgage. To make sure the businesses are getting along.we have mssive small business are getting to SBA.Those are steps we’ve taken. But I understand peoples’ frustrations. The American people have gone through a very tough year, and my job, as a president is to help them navigate though this tough year. People who don’t have job right now, people who have lost their homes, I have been met two. And they expect me to do something about that. My job is to, within the institutional constraint that I have, the resource constraint that we have because we also in a structural deficit  of several trillion dollars to try to make the best decisions possible to help as many people as possible.
立即获取| 免费注册领取外教体验课一节
on vicky2009

We've received a lot of questions from CNN Ireporters who went to our website. They want to ask you questions directly. This one is from Guy Watson in Albuquerque.

My question is why have you chosen to give
our
tax money to the banks without holding them responsible or forcing them to lower their rates for startups and to facilitate refinancing of foreclosing homes?

You hear that a lot?

I do. And I think it's important to understand. First of all that the so-called bank bailout started before we came in. * the right thing to do in a crisis. We had to make sure you did not have
complete meltdown which would be even worse. And I've said in the past I supported President Bush's decision to move forward on that. Once we got them in place where we were no longer a crisis. The problem was things were put together so quickly last year that the one is many strength attached as we would have liked. And so what we’ve tried to do is to create some structures after the fact that would impose more accountability, more discipline. You know, most obvious example would be the rules on executive pay. But it's always hard to do particularly when a lot of these banks now got well and they just paid the money back. And so we now no longer have leverage. This is why I think it's so important moving forward to make sure that we got a financial regulatory framework that protects consumers, make sure that they are not getting gouged, make sure that there is a lot clarity in terms of mortgages they are getting. In the meantime, just on emergency basis we are trying to do everything we can to pope prod incentive advise banks to help responsible home owners who through no falter their own are finding very tough with them to pay for the mortgage, to make sure the businesses are getting awesome. We massively spend small business lending through the SBA. Those are all steps we are taking. But look I understand people's frustrations. I mean American people have gone through a very tough year. And, you know, my job as president is to help navigate through this tough year. And, you know, people who don't have a job right now, people who have lost their home, you know, I've been meant to and they expect me to do something about it. And you know my job is to within the institutional constraints that I have and the resource constraints we have, because we also inherited a structure deficit of several trillion dollars to try to make the best decisions possible to help as many people as possible.

实现无障碍英语沟通

[ Rookie_Homework ]

We see a lot of question from CNN I reported. So, I wen to our website , they want to ask you the question directlly. This was from Gide Watson in **.

"My question is why have you choose to give our tax money to the banks without holding them responsble or forcing them to lower their rate for startup, and to *, refinacing for closing homes. "

Here that a log.

I do. And, I think it's very important to unstand first of all that the * bank built up started before we came in. I actually think the right thing to do in a crisis. We have to ensured you didn't keep melting down ** even worse. I said in the past I supported the Pressident Bush's decession to move forward on that. Once we got them in a place we no longer in the crisis, the problem was the things we put so quickly last year, that the one mainly is stranged to attach as we would like. So , and, what we try to do is to create the structure after the fact that would impose more accountabilty more *. Most * example would be the worlds on exactlly  pay. But it's always hard to do particuarlly when allow these banks get weal and just pay the money back. So, now, we no longer have average. This's why we think so important to move in forward to make sure we got a regularly financial * .Framwork, that protect consumers, make sure they didn't get the *. Make sure that there's a lot of encourage in terms of that more * they are getting. In the meantime , just on the emergency bases, we're trying to do everything we can to pop product in * lines, banks to help responsable home workers to no falut to their owners finding a very tough to pay them more. To make sure the businesses are getting launcing. We massively expact more businesses to the SBA. And those of all steps we are taking. But, look, I know people are furstrated. I mean the American people have gone through a very tough year. In my job, as pressident, is to help them navigate to thourgh this tough year. And ,people don't have job right now, people who have lost their home. I'll be mad too. And they expected me to do something about it. In my job. within the insititution * that I have and the * resourses that we have. Because, we also in hurry to a * deposit of several * dollars to try to make a decession to help as many people as possible.

No fear, no embarrassment.  But taking self-knowledge.
口译专员推荐—>口译训练软件IPTAM口译通
My question is why have you choose to give our tax money to the banks, without holding memory *or forcing them to lower their raise for start ups and to * refinancing for closing homes.

You hear that a lot?
I do, and I think it’s important to understand first of all that the so-called bank big a lot, start before we come in. I think those the right things to do in a crisis we had to make sure that you didn’t ever completed that which would be wouldn’t be ever worse. And I have said in the past, I support President Bush’s decision to move forward on that, once we got them in a place where they are no longer in crisis, the problem was think that were put together so quickly last year, that the * made the streams suttached as we***. And so what we trying to do is to create some structures after the fact, that would impose more *, more disappoint, most obious examples would be the rules exactly on the pay.

But it always hard to do practically when allow these banks now get well and then they just pay the money back and so we now no longer have labototy. This is why think so important moving forward to make sure that we get finance regulartory framework that protects consumers, make sure that they can’t getting crushed, make sure that there is a lot clarity in terms of, more *they are getting. In the mean time just on the mergency basis we trying to do everything we can to *****in * banks to help resposible homeworks to through no thought**or find very tuff to pay for more ages. To make sure the business are getting along the wave mass of *****

Have those of all steps were taken, but look I understant people frustations. The american people have gone through a very tuff year, and my job, as president is to help navigate through this tuff year, and people who don’t have job now, people who have lost their home, I will be made to, and they expect mean to something about it and my job is within the instituional constriction that have and resorce institution we have, because we also inherd a structure defense of several trillion dollars to try to make the best decisions possible to help as many people as possilbe.
Life is an attitude

[Homework]2009-11-20&11-22 奥巴马答CNN观众问

HW
We've received a lot of questions from CNN iReporter,so went to the website, they wanna ask you question directly. This question is from Guy Watson, in Albuquerque.
My question is why have you chosen to give tax money to the banks without holding them responsible or forcing them to lower their rates for startups and to facilitate refinancing of foreclosing homes?
You hear that?
I do.And I think it is important to understand, first of all,that the so-called bank bailout started before we came in.I think it was the right thing to do in a crisis.We had made sure you did not have completely meltdown which woule be even worse. And..and I've said in the past I supported president Bush's decisions to move forward on that.Once we get them in place where they were no longer in crisis. The problem was things were put together so quickly last year that there weren't many strains attached as we would like.And so we tried to do is to create some structures after the fact that would impose more accountability,more discipline.You kvow, most obvious exanple would be the rules on executive pay.But it is always hard to do particularly when a lot of these banks now got well and then they just paid the money back,so we are now no longer haveing leverage. This is why I think it's so important moving forward to make sure that we got financial regulatory framework that protects consumers,make sure that they are not getting indulged, make sure that there is a lot clarity in terms of mortgages they are getting. In the meantime, just on merge basis we are trying to do everything we can to pop proper incentive advise banks to help responsible home owners who through no falter their own are finding very tough for them to pay for the mortgage, to make sure that their businesses are getting awesome. We massively spend small business loans  through the SBA. You know,those all steps we are takeing, but look, I understand people's frustrations, mean American people have gone through a very tough year. And, you know, my job as president is to help them get through this tough year.And, you know, people who don't have a jobright now,people who have lost their home,you know,I've been meant to and they expect me to do something about it. And you know my job is to within the institutional constrains they have and the resource strength we have,because we also inherit a structure deficit of several trillion dollars to try to make the best decision possible to help as many people as possible.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
本帖最后由 北星束 于 2009-11-30 20:29 编辑

on  [url=space.php?uid=247938]quanyingbao19[/url]

I've received a lot of questions from CNN, iReporter, so went to our website, they wanna ask you question directly. This one was from Guy Watson in Albuquerque.

My question is why have you chosen to give our tax money to the banks, without holding them responsible or forcing them to lower their rates for startups and to facilitate refinancing of, foreclosing(应该是发错了,按语法应该是foreclosed) homes.

You hear that a lot. I do. And I think it's important to understand, first of all that the so-called bank bailout started before we came in. I actually think it was the right thing to do in a crisis we had to make sure that you didn't have a complete meltdown, which would have been even worse. And I've said in the past I supported President Bush's decision to move forward on that. Once we got them in a place where they were not longer incrisis, the problem was things were put together so quickly last year that there weren’t as many strings attached as we have liked, and so what we've tried to is to create some structures after the effect, that would impose more accountability, more discipline. You known the most obvious example would be the rules on executive pay. But it's always hard to do, particularly when a lot of these banks now get well and then just pay the money back and so we now not longer have leverage. This is why I think it's so important moving forward to make sure that we got a financial regulatory framework that protects consumers, make sure that they are not getting gouged, make sure that there is a lot of clarity in terms of mortgages they are getting. In the meantime, just on an emergency basis, we are tying to do everything we can to poke, prod, incentivize banks to help responsible homeowners who through no fault of their own are finding very tough for them to pay for their mortgage, to make sure that businesses are getting loans. We've massively expanded small businesses lending through the SBA. Those are all steps we've taken, but look, I understand people's frustrations. I mean the American people have gone through a very tough year, and you know, my job as president is to help navigate through this tough year. And you know people who don't have a job right now, people who have lost their home, you know, I've been mad too, and they expect me to do something about it. And you know, my job is to within the institutional constraints that I have and the resources constraints that we have because we also inherited a structural deficits of several trillion dollars to try to make the best decisions possible to help as many people as possible.
实现无障碍英语沟通

[Homework]【整理】2009-11-20&11-22 奥巴马答CNN观众问

We have received a lot of questions from CNN I reporters, so went our website wanna ask you questions directly. This one was Guy Watson in Albuquerque. My question is why you have chosen to give our tax money to the banks, without holding them responsible or forcing them to lower their rates for start-ups and who facilitate refinancing of…um, forclosing homes.


You have heard that a lot?

I do. And I think it’s important to understand first of all, that the so-called bank bailout started before we come in. I actually think it was the right thing to do in the crisis we have to make sure you didn’t have completed meltdown which would be even worse. And I have said in the past I support president bush’s decision to move forward on that. Once we got them in the place where they were no longer in crisis. The problem was the things were put together so quickly last year that there weren’t as many strings attached as we would like. And so what we’ve tried to do is to create some structures after the effect that would impose more accountability, more discipline

Most obvious example would be the rules on executive pay. But it’s always hard to do practically when a lot these banks now got well and then just paid the money back. So we now no longer have leverage, this is why I think this is so important moving forward to make sure that we got a financial regulatory framework that protects consumers, make sure they don’t get gouged, make sure that there is a lot clarity in terms of mortgages they are getting.

In the meantime, just on an emergency basis, we are just trying to do everything we can to poke, prod incentivize banks to help responsible homeowners who through no fault to their own are finding very tough for them to pay for the mortgages to make sure the business are getting loans, so we massively expand the small business lending through the SBA.


Those are all steps we are taken. But look I understand people’s frustrations. I mean the American people have gone through a very tough year. And you know my job, as a president, is to help navigate through this tough year. And you know people who don’t have their jobs right now, people who have lost their home. you know I will be mad too. And they expect me to do something about it. And you know my job is to within the institutional constraints that I have and the resource constraints we have, because we also inherited a structural deficits of several trillion dollars to try to make the best decisions possible to help as many people as possible.


This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
普特听力大课堂
HW
I've receive a lot of questions from CNN.IReport,so went to our website,they wanna ask you question directly.This one from Guy Watson in Albuquerque.
My question is why have you choosen to give our tax money to the banks,without holding them responsible or forcing them to lower their rates for startups and to facilitate refinancing of,foreclosing home.
you hear that a lot.I do.and I think it's important to understand first of all that the so-called band bailout start before we came in.I actually think it was the right thing to do in a crisis we have to make sure that you didn't have a complete meltdown,which would have been even worse.And I have said in the past I supported president Bush's decision to move forwrd on that.
once we got them in a place where they were no longer in crisis,the problem was  things were put together so quickly last year that there weren't as strings attached as we have liked,And so what we try to do is to create some structure after the effect.that would impose more accountability,more discipline.you know,the most obvious example would be the rule on executive pay.
But it's alway hard to do particularly when a lot these bands not get well and then just pay the money back and so we now no longer have leverage.This is why I think it's so important moving forward to make sure that we got a financial regulatory framework that protect consumers,make sure they are not getting gouged,make sure that there is a lot of clarity in terms of mortgages they are getting.In the mean time,just on an emergency basis we trying to do everything we can to poke,prod,incentivize,bands to help responsible homeowner who through no fault of their own are finding very tough for them to pay for the mortgage,make the business are getting loans.we massively expanded small business lending through the SBA.Those all steps we've taken,but look,I understand peole 's frustrations,I mean,the American people have gone through a very tough year,and you know,my job,as president is to help navigate through this tough year.
And people don't have a job right now,people who have lost their home,I've been mad too.and they expect me do something about it.And my job is within the institutional constraints that I have and the resoure constraints that we have because we slao inherited a strutural deficits of several trillion dollars to try to make the best decision possible to help as many people as possible.
返回列表