serenahh

benign here done not few results.that's the message behind the organisor of the thick tank Copenhagen consense center beyond langburg.the danish professor who is up at the climate change summit in Conpenhagen says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon immissions with expensice environment initiatives.the climate economist tell us that Copenhagen immission is actually quite expensive right now because we really don't have   technologies to pick up on so we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon to do very little bit for the future.cutting carbon immissions is the focus of the US on monday,the environmental protection agency announced that was towards regulations for green house gas imissions without legislation from US congress.this ajacks within environmental protection agency announce the changes.beginning in 2011,large meters will for the first time submit publicly available information that will allow   track green house imissions over time.it also means that we arrive at the climate talks in Conbenhagan was a clear denstration of our comitment to facing this global chllenge.but number desn't think the right effort will come ut f the Conbnhagan summit.i feel   what will happen here
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

Pocy

homework

Been here Denmark, few results that's the message behind the organisers of think tank, Copenhagan Consensus Center(丹麦哥本哈根共识中心),Bjorn Lomborg. The Danish professor who is at the Climate Change Summit in Copenhagan, says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with the expensive envirionmental -.

The climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now, because we really don't have good technologies to pick up on.So we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the future.

Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the United States on Monday. The environmental protection agency announced steps towards regulation for greenhouse gas emission without legislation from US Congress. Lisa Jackson with the invironmental protection agency announced the changes.

Beginning in 2011, large emitters will, for the first time, submit publicly available information that would allow us to meaningfully  track greenhouse gas emission over time. It also means that we will arrive that the climate talks in Copenhagen with the clear demostration of our commitment to facing this global challege.

But Lomborg doesn't think the right effort will come out after the Copenhagen summit.

Well, I've found given speculate what, what'll happen here . Every billy has been on a track for suveral years to come out and promise quite large carbon cuts all across board, now that it sounds really good, but because we've done that twice already, we did, we made the same promises as we own 1992. We've made even grander promises in Kyoto in 1997. We haven't a little double to any of them.

World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week.
Maryam Behmard, Reuters.
这是美音还是英音？那男的声音都点像“视听在线”中“流言终结者”的Jamie的声音。

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

猪仙女

Being here done that few results, that's the message behind the organizer of the thinktank - Copenhagen Consensus Center Bejon Longburg. The Danish professor who is at the climate changes summit in Copenhagen says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with the expensive environmental initiatives.

"The climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now because we really don't have good technologies to pick up on.So, we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the future."

Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the United States on Monday. The Environmental Protection Agency announced steps towards regulations for greenhouse gas emissions without legislation from US Congress. Lisa Jackson with the Environmental Protection Agency announced the changes.

"Beginnin in 2011, large meters will, for the first time, submit publicly available information that will allow us to meaningfully track greenhouse gas emissions over time. It also means that we arrive at the climate talks in Copenhagen with a clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge."

But Longburg doesn't think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen Summit. "Well, if I'm going to speculate what will happen here. Every bitty has been on track for several years to come out, I promise quite large carbon cuts all across the board. Now that sounds really good, but of course we've done that twice already. We made the same promises in Rio 1992, we made even grander promises in Kyoto in 1997, we haven't adopted any of them."


World leaders are scheduled to attend the Summit later next week. *, Reuters.

阿杰球球

been here denmark ,few results ,that's the message behind the organizer of the think tank copenhegen consensus center...the danish professor who is at the climate change summit in copenhagen  said the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with expensive environmental initiates.the climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now ,because we really don't have good technologies to pick up on ,so we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good to future .cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the united states on monday ,the environmental protection agency announced steps towards regulations for greenhouse gas emissions without legislation from US congress/...with the environmental protection agency announced the changes.beginning in 2011,large emitters will for the first time submit publicly available information that would allow us to meanfully track greenhouse gas emissions overtime ,it also means that we will arrive at the climate talks in copenhagen with a clear demonstration  of our commitment to facing this global challenge.but ...doesn't think the right effort will come out of the copenhagen summit.well .if i can speculate what will happen here ,every billy has been on track for several years to come out and promise quite large carbon cuts,all across the board now that sounds really good ,but of course we don't do that twice already ,we don't ,we made the same promises in reown 1992 .we made even grander promises in kyoto in 1997.we have a little double to any of them.world leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week .
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

mike74520

Being here done that few results that is the message behind the organizer of the tank thinker of Copenhagen concerns center. the professor who is upset about Copenhagen summit says the world is wasting money on tackling Copenhagen missions with expensive environmental initiatives. climate economy is telling us that tackling coupon missions is quite expensive right now because we really don't have good technology to pick up on. so we can spend a lot of money to cut the coupon to do little good for the future. cutting the coupon mission was the focus of the united states on Monday. environmental protection agency announce that saber to regulation for the green house gas mission without legislation from the us congress.lisa Jason within the environmental agency announce the changes.beginning in 2010, large middle will for the first time. submit public available information that will allow the track the meaningful green house gas mission over time.it also means that we are arriving at climate the top of Copenhagen with a clear demonstration that our commitment to face global challenge.but the Lindberg does not think the right effort will come out of Copenhagen summit. i am gonna speculate what are gonna happen here,every bitter have been attracted for several years to come out and promise, quite large coupon cuts. across the world it sounds quite good,but of course we have done that twice already, we have made the same promise in Rea in 1992, we have made even tole ranted promise in Kyoto in 1997.we have not look up for any of them.world leader are scheduled to attend the summit later next week.
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

yvonnechien

HW
Been here Denmark,few results,that's the message behind the organiser of the tink tank Copenhagen Consensus Center,B L.The Danish professor who is at the climate change summit in Copenhagen says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with expensive environmental initiatives.
"The climate economists are telling us cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now. Because we really don't have good technologies to pick up on.So we can't spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good to the future."
Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the United States on Monday.The Environmental Protection Agency announce steps towards regulation fo greenhouse gas emissions without legislation from US Congress.Lisa Jackson with The Environmental Protection Agency announced the changes.
"Beginning in 2011,large emitters will for the first time,submit publicly available information that will allow us to meaningfully track greenhouse gas emissions over time.It also means that we arrive at the climate talks in Copenhagen with clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge."
But L doesn't think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen summit.
"Well,if I found given speculate what will happen here, every billy has been on track for several years to come out and quite large carbon cuts.All cross the board now that sounds really good but of course, we've done that twice already,we did, we made the same promises as re-own 1992.We made even grander promise in Kyoto in 1997.We haven't a little double to any of them."
World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit latter next week.  

muma~!viviou

Been here in Denmark few results,that's the message behind the organizer of the Think tank Copenhagen consensus center--- Bjorn lomborg.The Danish professor who is at the climate  change summit in Copenhagen said the world is wasting  money on tackling carbon immisions with expensive environment initiatives.the climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now,because we really don't have good technologies to pick up on, so we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do a little good for the future. Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the United States . On Monday, The environment protection agency announce steps towards  regulations for greenhouse gas emissions without legislation from US congress.Lisa Jackson with the environmental protection agency annouced the changes.Beginning in 2011th,large emitters will for the first time submit publicly available information that would allow us to meaningfully track greenhouse gas emissions overtime. It also means that we arrive at the climate talks in Copenhagen with a clear demonstration of our committment to facing this global challenge. But Lomborg does not think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen summit. Well, I'm gonna speculate what will happen here,everybody has been attracted for several years to come out and promise quite a large carbon cuts all across the board. Now that sounds really good,but of course we've done that twice already, we did, we made the same promises in Rio in 1992,we made grander promises in KYOTO in 1997,we haven't lived up to anyone. World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week. Marian Bomard,Florida's
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

chillixlj

HW
Be here in denmark few result, that's message behind the oganizers of the thin tank Copenhagen consensus center beyond **. that day mr professor Hook is up the climate change summit in Copenhagen says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with the expensive enviromental initiatives.

climate economist is telling us that cutting carbon emission is a actually quite expensives right now because we really don't have good technologies to pick up on. so we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the future.

cutting carbon emissions was the focus of united states on ** the environmental protection agency announce steps towards regulations for greenhouse gas emissions without legislations from US congress. Lisa Jacson with the evironmental protection agency announce the changes.

beginning in the 2011 large meters will for the fist time submit pulicly available information that were allow us to meaningfully check greenhouse emissions over time. it also means that we arive at the climate talks in Copenhagen with a clear demonstration of our committment to facing this globally challenge.

but Lumber doesn't think the right effort were come out of the Copenhagen summit.

well from this speculate what we will happen here everybody has been atract for several years to come out and promise large carbon cost all cost of course sounds really good but of course we've done that twice already we did make the same promises in Rio 1992 we make even grander Kioto in 1997. we haven't look down to anything.

well, leaders are scedule to attend the summit later next week. Marian the ** Reuters.

zmpola

Homework

Being here  Denmark, few results. That's the message behind the organizer of the think tank  Copenhagen Consensus Center, Bjørn Lomborg. The Denmark professor who is at the Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with expensive environmental initiatives.

"The climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now, because we really don't have good technologies to pick up on. So we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the future."

Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the United States on Monday. The Environmental Protection Agency annouced steps toward the regulations for greenhouse gas emissions without legislation from US Congress. Lisa Jackson with the Environmental Protection Agency annouced the changes.

"Beginning in 2011, large emitters will for the first time submit publically available information that will allow us to meaningfully track greenhouse gas emissions over time. It also means that we arrived at the climate talks in Copenhagen with the clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge."

But  Lomborg doesn't think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen Summit.
"Well, we gonna speculate what will happen here. Every billy has been in track for several years to come up and promise quite large carbon cuts. All across the board now that sounds really good, but of course we've done that twice already. We made the same promise in Rio in 1992. We made even grander promises in Kyoto in 1997. We haven't a little led up to anyone."

World leaders are scheduled to attend the Summit later next week. Maryam Behmard, Reuters.

gerministar

homework
Been here,done that few results,that's the message behind the organizer of the think tank Copenhagen Consensus Center B.Ramberg.The Danish professor who is at the climate change summit in Copenhagen says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with expensive environmental initiatives.
The climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now one because we really don't have good technology to take up on.So,we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the   future.
Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the United Nations on Monday.The environmental protection agency announced steps towards regulations for greenhouse gas emissions without legislation from US Congress.
Lisa Jackson with the environmental protection agency announced the changes.
Beginning in 2011,large emitters will for the first time submit publicly available information that will allow us to meaningfully track greenhouse gas emissions over time.It also means that we arrived at the climate talks in Copenhagen with a clear declaration of our commitment to facing this global change.
But Ramberg doesn't think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen summit.
Well,I'm gonna speculate what will happen here.Everybody has been in track for several years to come out and promise quite large carbon curbs all across the board.Now that sounds really good,but of course,we've done that twice already.We did,we made the same promises in Lyon in 1992.We made them grand promises in Kyoto in 1997.I haven't lived up to any of them.
World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week.
/,Reuters.

summeralways

homework
being here in Denmark ,few results ,that is the message behind the organizer of the think tank Copenhagen  consus center beyond Lamburger.
The Dannish professor who is up to climate change in Copenhagen says the world is wasting money in tackling carbon emmissions with expensive climate itiniatives.the environment economicistis told us  that cutting carbon emmission is quite an expensive way right now,because we actually don't have much technique to pick up on  ,so we spent lot of money ,and cut little bit  carbon ,and to do very little good to the future.
cutting carbon emmison is the focus of United States.on Monday ,the environmental protection agency annouced the excerpt words of  regulations for green house emmisson without the legisilation of United Congress.Lisa //,within the environmental protection agency announced the changes:beginning in 2011,large meter of will for the first time submit publicly available information that will allow us to meaningfully track the green house gas emmission.it also means that we have arrived the climate talks in Copenhagen with clear demonsatration of our commssion to facing this golbal challenge.
but Louber doesen't think the effort will not come out of the Copenhagen summit.i 'm gonna speculate what will happen here every time we tracks for ,several years came out ,and we promised quite lot of carbon cut all across abroad ,well ,that's sound reallygood.of course,we 've done that twice already.we made the same promises in Realona in 1992,we even made grander promises in Kyoto in 1997,we haven't adopted to anyone.
world leaders are scheduled to attend the  summit later next week .
Mary Ledermat,Reuters.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

3895mp

HW
Been here Denmark few results that's the message behind the organizer of the think tank,Copenhagen Consenus Center Bjorn Lomborg.The Danish professor who is at the climate change summit in Copenhagen says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with expensive environmental initiatives.
"The climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now.Because we really don't have good technologies to pick up on.So we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the future. "
Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the United States on Monday.The Environmental Protection Agency announced steps towards regulations for greenhouse gas emissions without legislations from US Congress.Lisa Jackson with the Environmental Protection Agency announced the changes.
"Beginning in 2011,large emitters will for the first time submit publicly available information that will allow us to meaningfully track greenhouse gas emission overtime.It also means that we arrive at the climate talks in Copenhagen with a clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge."
But Lomborg doesn't think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen Summit.
"Well,if I found given speculate what will happen here ,every billy has been on track for several years to come out and promise quite large carbon cuts.Or across the board now that sounds really good,but of course we've done that twice already .We did,we made the same promises as re-own 1992.We made even grander promises in Kyoto in 1997.We haven't a little done to any of them ."
World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week.
Marya Bermard.

plumejxy

HW
Been here Denmark few results, that is the message behind the organizer of think tank Copenhagen consensus center B L. the Danish professor who is at the climate summit in Copenhagen says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with expensive environmental initiatives.

The environment economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is quite expensive right now, because we really don’t have good technologies to pick up on. So we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good to the future.

Cutting carbon emission was the focus of the United States on Monday. The environmental protection agency announced steps towards regulation for green house gas emissions without legislation from US congress.

L with the environmental agency announced the changes. Beginning in 2011, large emitters will for the first time submit public available information that will allow us to meaningfully to track greenhouse emission overtime. It also means that we arrived at the climate talks in Copenhagen with a clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge.

But L doesn’t think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen summit. Well, I am going to speculate what will happen here, every xx has been tracked by several years to come out and promise quite large carbon cuts all across the board, now that it sounds really good but of course we’ve done that twice already. We did, we made the same promises in R in 1992, we made even grander promises in K in 1997. we have a little doubt to any of them. World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week.

plumejxy

HW
Been here Denmark few results, that is the message behind the organizer of think tank Copenhagen consensus center B L. the Danish professor who is at the climate summit in Copenhagen says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with expensive environmental initiatives.

The environment economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is quite expensive right now, because we really don’t have good technologies to pick up on. So we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good to the future.

Cutting carbon emission was the focus of the United States on Monday. The environmental protection agency announced steps towards regulation for green house gas emissions without legislation from US congress.

L with the environmental agency announced the changes. Beginning in 2011, large emitters will for the first time submit public available information that will allow us to meaningfully to track greenhouse emission overtime. It also means that we arrived at the climate talks in Copenhagen with a clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge.

But L doesn’t think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen summit. Well, I am going to speculate what will happen here, every xx has been tracked by several years to come out and promise quite large carbon cuts all across the board, now that it sounds really good but of course we’ve done that twice already. We did, we made the same promises in R in 1992, we made even grander promises in K in 1997. we have a little doubt to any of them. World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week.

fannybear

HW
Been here Denmark few results,that's the message behind the organizer of the think tank Copenhagen Consensus Centre Bejord Lomberg. The Danish professor who is at the climate change summit in Copenhagen says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with expensive environmental initiatives. 'The climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now,because we really don't have good technologies to pick up on.So we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the future.' Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the US on Monday.The environmental protection agency announce steps towards regulations for greenhouse gas emissions without legislation from US congress.Lisa Jackson with the environmental protection agency announce the changes. 'Beginning in 2011,large emitters will for the first time submit publicly available information that will allow us to meaningfully track greenhouse gas emissions overtime.It also means that we arrive at the climate talks in Copenhagen with the clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge.'But Lomborg doesn't think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen Summit. 'Well,I'm gonna speculate on what will happen here.Every / has been in track for several years to come out and promise quite large carbon cuts all across the board.Now that sounds really good,but of course we've done that twice already.We did,we made the same promises in Rio in 1992. We made even grander promises in Kyoto in 1997.We haven't looked up to any of them.'World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week.