只用一本书提高英语听力能力!重温经典名著双语阅读小编推荐:跟着纪录片学英语不背单词和语法,轻松学英语
返回列表 回复 发帖

[I&A] 【整理】2009-12-10: 哥本哈根气候峰会遭质疑

提高英语听力能力 找对方法很重要!

[Homework]【整理】2009-12-10: 哥本哈根气候峰会遭质疑

Been here, Denmark, few results that's the message behind the organizer of the thinks tank Copenhagen Consensus Center, Bjon Lomburg.
The Danish professor who is at the climate change summit in Copenhagen, says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with the expensive environmental initiatives.
The climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now. Because we really don't have good technologist take up on. So we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the futre.
Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the United States on Monday. The Environmental Protection Agency announced steps towards regulations for green house gas emissions without legislation frmo U.S. Congress. Lisa Jackson within Environmental Protectin Agency announced the changes.
Beginning in 2011, larger emitters will for the first time, sumbit publicly available information that will allow us to meaningfully track greenhouse gas emissions over time. It also means that we arrive at climate talks in Copenhagen with a clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge.
But Lomburg doesn't think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen summit. Well, *** speculate what will happen here, everybody has been on track for several years to some out and promise quite large carbon cuts. All across board and another sounds really good, but of course we have done that twice already we did. We made the same promise in Rion 1992. We made even grand promise in Koyto in 1997. We haven't live up to any of them.
World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week. Maryam Behumd, Floridas.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
Been here, Denmark, few results that's the message behind the organizer of the thinks tank Copenhagen Consensus Center, Bjon Lomburg.

The Danish professor who is at the climate change summit in Copenhagen, says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with the expensive environmental initiatives.

"The climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now. Because we really don't have good technologist take up on. So we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the futre.

Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the United States on Monday. The Environmental Protection Agency announced steps towards regulations for green house gas emissions without legislation frmo U.S. Congress. Lisa Jackson within Environmental Protectin Agency announced the changes.

"Beginning in 2011, larger emitters will for the first time, sumbit publicly available information that will allow us to meaningfully track greenhouse gas emissions over time. It also means that we arrive at climate talks in Copenhagen with a clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge."

But Lomburg doesn't think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen summit. "Well, *** speculate what will happen here, everybody has been on track for several years to some out and promise quite large carbon cuts. All across board and another sounds really good, but of course we have done that twice already we did. We made the same promise in Rion 1992. We made even grand promise in Koyto in 1997. We haven't live up to any of them.

World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week. Maryam Behumd, Floridas.
立即获取| 免费注册领取外教体验课一节
HW

  Be in here Denmark, few results that’s the message behind the organiser of the think tank Copenhagen Consensus Center, Bjorn Lomborg. The Danish professor who is at the climate chage summit in Copenhagen says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with the expensive environmental initiatives.

“ The climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now. Because we really don’t have good technologists to pick up on. So we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the future.”

Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the United States on Monday. The Environmental Protection Agency announced steps towards regulations for greenhouse gas emissions without legislation from US Congress. Lisa Jackson with the Environmental Protection Agency announced the changes.

“ Begining in 2011, large emitters will for the first time, submit publicly available information that will allow us to meaningfully trace greenhouse gas emissions over time. It also means that we arrive at the climate talks in Copenhagen with a clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge.”

But Lomborg doesn’t think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen summit.

“ Well, if I can speculate what will happen here, every billy has been on track for several years to come out and promise quite large carbon cuts. All across the board now that sounds really good, but of course we don't do that twice already, we don’t, we made the same promises as re-own 1992. We made even grander promises in Kyoto in 1997. We have a little double to any of them.”

World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week. Maryam Behmard, Reuters.
实现无障碍英语沟通

[Homework]【整理】2009-12-10: 哥本哈根气候峰会遭质疑

Been here, done that, few results, that's the message behind the organizer of the thinktank Copenhagen Consensus Center. Bjorn Lomborg, the Danish professor who is at the climate change summit in Copenhagen says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with expensive environmental initiatives.
The climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now, because we really don't have good technologies to pick up on. So we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the future.

Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the United States on Monday. The Environmental Protection Agency announced steps towards regulations for greenhouse gas emissions without legislation from US Congress. Lisa Jackson with the Environmental Protection Agency announced the changes.

Beginning in 2011, large emitters will for the first time submit publicly available information that will allow us to meaningfully track greenhouse gas emissions over time. It also means that we arrive at the climate talks in Copenhagen with a clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge.

But Lomborg doesn't think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen summit.
Well, if I'm gonna speculate what will happen here, everybody has been on track for several years to come out and promise quite large carbon cuts all across the board.Now that sounds  really good, but of course<STRIKE> </STRIKE>we’ve done that twice already. We made the same promises in Rio in 1992, we made even grander promises in Kyoto in 1997. We haven't lived up to any of them.
World leaders are scheduled to attend this summit later next week. Maryam Behmard, Reuters.








This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
口译专员推荐—>口译训练软件IPTAM口译通
又没有翻译啊,虽然每个词都知道什么意思,可句子翻译起来有困难

[Homework]【整理】2009-12-10: 哥本哈根气候峰会遭质疑

Homework
Been here done that few results,that's the message behind the organizer of the think-tank Copenhagen consensus center Beyond Lumber.The Danish professor,who is at the climate summit in Copenhagen,says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with expensive environmental initiatives.

The climate economists are telling us cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now because we really don't have good technologies to take up on.So we can spend a lot money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the future.

Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the United States on Monday.The environmental Protection Agency announced steps toward regulations for greenhouse gas emissions without legislation from US congress.Lisa Jackson with the environmental Protection Agency announced the changes.

'Beginning in 2011,large meters of will,for the first time,submit publicly available information that will allow us to meaningfully track greenhouse emissions over time.It also means that we arrived at the climate talks in Copenhagen with clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge.'But Lumber doesn't think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen summit.

'Well,I cannot gonna speculate what will happen here,everybody has been untracked for several years to come out,and promised quite large carbon cuts all across the border that sounds very good,but of course we have done that twice already.We made the same promises in Rio in 1992,we made even grander promises in Kyoto in 1997.We haven't adapted to any of them.World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week.





This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

[Homework]【整理】2009-12-10: 哥本哈根气候峰会遭质疑

Be in here Denmark few resorts that's the message behind the organize
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
实现无障碍英语沟通
Homework:
Being there demands few results, that is the message behind the organizers of thinking-tank Copenhagen concessive center for xx. J is professor who is at climate summit in Copenhagen says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with expensive environment initially.

The climate xx talking us a cut of carbon emission is quite expensive right now because we would have not good technology to pick up on, so we can spend lots of money to cut little carbon in to do very little good to future.

Cutting carbon emission was the focus of the USA on Monday. The environmental protection agency announced that was toward the regulations for green house gas emission without legislation from US congress. L Jackson with her environment protection agency announced the changes.

Beginning in 2011, large meters xx for the first time, submit publicly available information that would allow us meaningfully to track green house emission overtime. It also means that there were arrivals of climate toxics in Copenhagen with a clear demonstration of our commitments to facing this global challenge.

But L does not think the right effort will come out at the Copenhagen summit.

Well, it xx speciously what will happen here, everybody has been in track for several years coming up and promises quite large carbon cut. All the cross-board sounds very good, but the question is we done that twice already. We did, we make xx promises. We made nine percent promise in 1992. We made even a brand-new promise in Tokyo in 1997. We have looked up for any from them.

World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week.

Maria.
回归PUT......
寂寞会传染,本人已免疫。
普特听力大课堂
hw

“Being here, done that, few results,” that’s the message behind the organizer, the think tanker, Copenhagen Consensus Center Bjorn Lomborg. The Danish professor who is out the climate change summit in Copenhagen, says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with expensive environmental initiative. “the climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now, because we really don’t have good technologies to pick up on, so we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the future.”

Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the Untied States on Monday. The Environmental Protection Agency announced that’s up to the regulations for green house gases emissions without legislation from U.S. Congress. Lisy Jackson with the Environmental Protection Agency announced the changes. “Beginning in 2011, large meters will for the first time, so made publically available information that will allow us to meaning full atrack, green house gas emissions are over time, it also means that we’ve arrived at the climate talks in Copenhagen with the clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge.”

But Longber doesn’t think the right effort will come out of the Copenhagen summit. “well, from a good speculator, what will happen here, everybody have been attracted for several years to come out and promise quite a large carbon cuts. All cross board now sound really good, but of course we’ve been there twice already we did, we made the same promises in Regyou in 1992, we even made grander promises in Kyoto in 1997, we haven’t live up to any of them.”

World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week.

Maried Mard, Reuters.
New term, new target!  just do it!

ECO论坛,提高英语翻译能力、开拓知识视野的好地方!www.ecocn.org/forum/index.php
好栏目推荐之美国口语俚语

[Homework]【整理】2009-12-10: 哥本哈根气候峰会遭质疑

Been here in Danmark, few results. That the message behind the organiser of the theme tank,Copenhegen Consensus Center Beyon Lamburger.Professer who is at the Climate Change Summit in Copenghegen said the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emmissions with expensive climate initiatives.
This time the economists are telling us that cutting carbon emmissions is actually quite expensive right now, because we really don't have good techonolies to pick on. So we spend a lot of money to cut a liitle carbon and to do very little good for the future.
Cutting carbon emissions was the focus of the Unitied States on Monday.The Environmental protection agency announced steps towards regulations for greenhouse gas emissions without legislation from US congress.Lesi Jacson with the environmental protection announced the changes.
Beginning in 20th of 11, large minors will for the first time submit publicly available information that allow us to meaningfully to track greenhouse gas emmissions over time.It also means that we arrive at Climate talks in Copenghegen with the clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge.
But Lamber doesn't think the right effort will come out of the Copenghegen Summit.
I'm going to speculate what will happen here. Everybody has been in track for several years to come out and promise quite large Carbon cuts across the border another. Sound really good. But of course we've done that twice already We made the same promises in Rio in 1992.We've made even grander the promises in Keodo in 1997. We haven't look up to anyone.
World leaders are secheduled to attend the summit later next week.


This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

[Homework]【整理】2009-12-10: 哥本哈根气候峰会遭质疑

been here,done not,few results.that's the message behind the organizer of the thinktank Copenhagen concensus center Beyond lonburger.the danish professor who is at the climate change summit in copenhagan says that the world is wasting money on tackling carben emissions with expensive environmental initialtives.the climate economist are telling us that cutting carben emission is quite expensive right now.because we don't really have good technology to pick up on so we can spend a lot of money and to cut a little carben and to do very little goog to the future.cutting carben emission was the focus of the United States on Monday.the environmental protection angency announced steps towards regulations for greenhouse gas emission without legislation from US congress.Lisa Jackson with the environmental protection agency announced the changes.beggining in 2011,large emitters will for the first time submit publicly available information that will allow us to meaningfully track greenhouse gas emissions information over time.it also means that we arrived at the climate talks in copenhagen with clear demonstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge.but lumber doesn't think the right effort will come out of the cobenhagen summit.well,if i'm gonna speculate what will happen here,everybody has been on track for several years to come out,and promise quite large carben cuts all across the board.now that sounds really good,but of course we've done it twice already,we made the same promise in reo 1992,we made even grander promise in Kyoto in 1997,we haven't lived up to any of them.world leaders are scheduled to attend a summit later next week.Mary in Denbark,reuters.
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

[Homework]【整理】2009-12-10: 哥本哈根气候峰会遭质疑

Homework
been here, done that, few result that's message behind your organizer of the think tank copehagen consense center be on your long berg. the danish professor who is upper climate change summit in copenhagen said the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions,with expensive environmental initiatives.the climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now, because we don't have good technologies to pick up on. so we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good to the future.cutting carbon emissions is the focus of the United states on monday. the environmental protection agency announces steps toward a regulation for green house as emissions without legislation from Us congress. Lisa Jackson the weekly environmental protection agency annouce the changes,
beginning in 2011,large emmitors will for the first time,submit publicly available information that allow us to meaningfully track green house emmisions over times, it also means, that we arrived climate toxin in copenhagenwith this clear demonstration of our commitment facing this global challenge.but longbert doesn't think the right effort will come out at the copenhagen summit
well, if I'm gonna speculate what will happen here, everybody has been on track for several years to come out, and promise quite large carbon cuts all across the board. Nowthat sounds really good. but of course we have down that twice already we, did, made the same promises in Rio in 1992, we made even grandeur promises in Kyoto in 1997,we haven't lived up to any of them. world leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week Maryam Behmard, Reuters.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
每天半小时 轻松提高英语口语
为什么首句是been there?
我怎么听不出来there,我一直只听到been here.是因为弱读了吗?

[Homework]【整理】2009-12-10: 哥本哈根气候峰会遭质疑

HW 2nd
Been here, done that, few results that's the message behind the organizer of the think tank  coprehengon concern centre be in lamborg.
The Danish professor who is after climate change some in coprehengon says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with expensive enviromental initiatives.
Climate economists are telling us that cutting carbon emissions is actually quite expensive right now. Because we really don't have good technologies to pick up on. So we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the future.
Cutting carbon emmisions was the focus of the united states on Monday. The enviromental protection agency announce steps towards regulations for greenhouse gas emmissions without legislation from US Congress. Lisa Jacksons with the enviromental protection agency announce the changes.
Begining in 2011, lager emmiller will for the 1st time submit publicly available information that will allow us to meaningfully track greenhouse gap emissions over time. It also means that we arrive at the climiate talks in corpenhengon with the clear demonstration of our commitment to facing the global challenge.
Lambour doesn't think the right effort will come out after the corpenhengon summit.
Well I am going to speculate what will happen here. Everybody have been tracked for several years to come out and promise quite large carbon cuts all across the board. Now that sounds quite good. But of cause we  done that twice already. We did, we made the same promises in Yio in 1992. We may even grander the promises in Kyoto in 1997. We haven't adopted to any of them.
World leaders are scheduled to attend the summit later next week. Marrial AMard forwarders

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
口译专员推荐—>口译训练软件IPTAM口译通

[Homework]【整理】2009-12-10: 哥本哈根气候峰会遭质疑

Being here done that, few results that's the message behind the organizers, the think tank Copenhagen concern's center Beyond Longber. The Danish professor who is up climate change summit in Copenhagon says the world is wasting money on tackling carbon emissions with the expensive environmental initiatives. The climate columists are telling us cutting carbon is actually expensive right now because we really don't have good technology to pick up on, so we can spend a lot of money to cut a little carbon and to do very little good for the future. Cutting carbon emission was the focus of the U.S. on Monday, the environmental protection agency announces steps towards regulation for greenhouse gas emission without legislation from US Congress. Lisa Jackson with the environmental protection agency announce the changes. Beginning in 2011, large submitors will for the 1st time submit publicly available information that will allow us to meaningfully track greenhouse gas emission overtime. It also means that we'll arrive at the climate talks in Copenhagen with clear demenstration of our commitment to facing this global challenge. But Longbor doesn't think the right effort will come out at Copenhagen summit. We'll speculate what will happen here. Everybody will have to track for several years to come out. And promise quite large carbon cuts all across the board. It sounds really good. But because we've done this twice already. We're made the same promises in Rio in 1992, we made even grander promises in Kyoto in 1997. We've not lived up to any of them. World leaders are scheduled to attend this summit later next week. Marry Edmud avoiders.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
返回列表