只用一本书提高英语听力能力!重温经典名著双语阅读小编推荐:跟着纪录片学英语不背单词和语法,轻松学英语
返回列表 回复 发帖

[科技前沿] 【整理】2010-07-15&07-17 警察应该在身上安装摄像机?

提高英语听力能力 找对方法很重要!

[科技前沿] 【整理】2010-07-15&07-17 警察应该在身上安装摄像机?

user posted image
Should Cops Wear Body Cameras?


Officials debate the cost and merits of buying on-person cameras.

user posted image


【电信1】 RealVideo / mp3

【电信2】 RealVideo / mp3

【网通/教育网】 RealVideo / mp3

点击进入多主题版块听写规则(新手必读)


版主提示:
一、若是自己的听写稿, 请发帖时标注'Homework'.
二、若是改稿, 请发帖时标注'on 某某人'并在修改处标红.
三、为了达到最快的下载速度,推荐使用迅雷高速下载本站音频/视频材料.



尼采的圣经在 整理的参考文本:
When it comes to evidence, the camera doesn't lie. Over the years , law enforcement here in Seattle has used video cameras and their police cruisers to show proof of a crime of just a document proper procedure. But now city council member Bruce Harro wants to exploit the possibility of placing  the sturdily-art cameras on the officers themselves.



-I believe that this is the way of the future.That we are in a video technology age, it's a good way to establish a good record on what's happening out there.



In a special meeting today at city hall. Two separate companies, Viview and Taser International made their pitch to demonstrate the latest on-person video camera technologies. The cost, anywhere from 900$ up to 1,700$ per unit. But not everyone is sold on the idea.



-You are talking about millions of dollars of investment on technology, what's the cost benefit analysis in a large organization?

-And you don't have the answer to that yet.

-I do not have the answer to that.



-I believed last year Seattle probably spent around 16 million dollars just handling over 1,400 complaints that were made against the officers. And in studies we've seen both domestically and internationally.We've seen anywhere between 40 up to a 100 percent of reduction in complaints.



Recently incidents here in Seattle have shown that video can be a very powerful tool that can benefit both the officer and the citizen.



-What concern you more now as we saw is the incidents out there we don't get the chance to see, we want to know what's happening out there. And say it again, if we have the technology, we should use it.



According to some police departments, body bond camera should be the way of the future. Documenting everything from the officer's point of view. And the video will not only help convict people , but to help cops defend themselves from allegation of rudeness or even police brutality.


下载LRC文件

普特在线文本比较普特在线听音查字普特在线拼写检查普特文本转音频

人間の優劣は、他者との比較で決めるものではなく、自分自身の中で決定されるもの。

本帖最后由 Bingr8 于 2010-7-15 08:55 编辑

Hw

What comes to evidence the camera doesn't lie , over the years long enforcement here in Seattle, has use video cameras in their police cruisers to show of a proof of a crime or just a document proper procedure , but now city council member Bruce Harrell wants to explore the possibility of placing the state-of-the-art cameras on the officers themselves

It’s I believe that this is the way of the future , that we are in the video technology age , It's a good way to establish a good record on what's happening out there.

In a special meeting today at city hall, two separate companies , Vievu and Taser International,made their pitch to demonstrate the latest on-person video camera technologies. The cost  anywhere from 900 dollars up to 1,700 dollars per unit. But not everyone is sold on the idea. You're talking about millions of dollars on investment in technology. What's the cost benefit analysis in a large organization? And you don't have the answer to that yet? I do not have the answer to that

I believe last year Seattle probably spent  around 6 million dollars just handling over 1400 complains that were made against the officers, And in studies that we've seen both domestically and internationally, we're seeing anywhere between 40 up to 100 percent reduction in complains.

Recent incidents here in Seattle have shown that the video can be very powerful tool that can benefit for the officer and the citizen

What concerns me more is not what we saw, it's the incidents out there that we don't get a chance to see , We want to know what's happening out there in the city. again, if we have the technology, we should use it.

According to some police departments, body mounted cameras should be the way of the future documenting everything from the officer's point of view. And the video will not only help convict people, but help cops defend themselves from allegations of rudeness, or even police brutality.

In Seattle John \ news
1

评分次数

ONE'S POTENTIAL IS WHAT ONE BELIEVE IT TO BE !
立即获取| 免费注册领取外教体验课一节
HOMEWORK

When it comes to evidence, the camera doesn’t lie.  Over the years long and force with here in Seattle has used video cameras in their police cruises to show prove of a crime or just a document proper procedure.  

But now city council member Bruce Harrow wants to explore the possibility of placing / cameras on the officers themselves.  

“It’s I believe that this the way of the future, that we are in a video technology age.  It’s a good way to set a good record what's happening out there.”

In a special meeting today in the city hall, two separate companies, EU and TASER International, made their pitch to demonstrate the latest on-person video camera technologies.  The cost, any where from 900 up to 1700 dollars per unit.  But not anyone is sold on the idea.  

“You’re talking about millions of dollars of investment in technology, what’s the cost benefit and analysis in a large organization?”  “And you don’t have an answer to that yet?”   “I do not have the answer to that.”  

“I believe last year Seattle probably spent around six million dollars to settling over 1400 complains.  They were made against officers.  And in studies, we have seen both domestically or internationally, we are seeing anywhere between 40% up to 100 % reduction in complains.”  

Recent incidents here in Seattle have shown that the video can be a very powerful tool that can benefit both the officer and the citizen.  

“What concerns more is not what we saw; it’s the incidents out there we don’t get a chance to see.  We want to know what’s happening out there in the city again.  If we have the technology we should use it.”  

According to some police departments, body / cameras should be the way of the future, documenting everything from the officers’ point of view.  And the video will not only help convict people, but help cops defend themselves from allegations of rudeness or even police brutality.  

In Seattle, John Desapolo / news.
1

评分次数

实现无障碍英语沟通

[Homework]2010-07-15&07-17 警察应该在身上安装摄像机?

What comes to evidence? The camera doesn't lie. Over the years long, force with here in S** has used video cameras in the police cruises to show proof of crime and just document proper procedure. Now,city council member Bruce Hero wants to explore the possibility of placing steads cameras on the officers themselves.
  --They believed that this is the way of the future. And that we are in the video technology age,it's a good way to establish good record on what's happening out there.
  So this is then....
  In the special meeting today in the city hall,2 seperate companies Vivu and Taser international made their pitch to demonstrate the latest on person video camera technologies. The cost anywhere from 900 up to 17000 dollars per unit. But now everyone is sold on the idea.
  --You're talking about millions of dollars of best technology.What's the cost benefit analysis in a large organization.
  --And you do not have the answer,don't yet?
  --I do not have the answer to that.
  --I believe last year S*** spend around 6 billion dollars distantly handling over 1400 complains that were made against the officers.And in studies that we have seen both domestic leaders and international,we are seeing anywhere between 40 up to 100 precent reduction in complains.
  Recent incidents here in S** have shown video can be a very powerful tool that can benefit both for officer and the citizen.
  --What concerns me more is not what we saw.It's the incidents out that we don't get chance to see. We want to know what's happening out there in the city. Again,if we have the technology,we should use it.
  According to some police departments, body-weared camera should be the way of the future documenting everything from the officers's point of view. And the video will not only help the convict people,but helps cops defend themselves from allegation of rudeness or even police brutality.
  In S**,John,S C.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
1

评分次数

口译专员推荐—>口译训练软件IPTAM口译通
Hw

What comes to evidence the camera doesn't lie , over the years long enforcement here in Seattle, has use video cameras in their police cruisers to show of a proof of a crime or just a document proper procedure , but now city council member Bruce Harrell wants to explore the possibility of placing the state-of-the-art cameras on the officers themselves

that I believe that this is the way of the future , that we are in the video technology age , It's a good way to establish a good record on what's happening out there.

In a special meeting today at city hall, two separate companies , Vievu and Taser International,made their pitch to demonstrate the latest on-person video camera technologies. The cost  anywhere from 900 dollars up to 1,700 dollars per unit. But not everyone is so on the idea. You're talking about millions of dollars on investment in technology. What's the cost benefit analysis in a large organization? And you don't have the answer to that yet? I do not have the answer to that

I believe last year Seattle probably spent  around 6 million dollars just handling over 1400 complains that were made against the officers, And in studies that we've seen both domestically and internationally, we're seeing anywhere between 40 up to 100 percent reduction complains.

Recent incidents here in Seattle have shown that the video can be very powerful tool that can benefit for the officer and the citizen

What concerns me more is not what we saw, it's the incidents out there that we don't get a chance to see , We want to know what's happening out there in the city. again, if we have the technology, we should use it.

According to some police departments, body mounted cameras should be the way of the future documenting everything from the officer's point of view. And the video will not only help convict people, but help cops defend themselves from allegations of brudeness, or even police brutality.
1

评分次数

本帖最后由 尼采的圣经 于 2010-7-16 11:29 编辑

HOMEWORK

What it comes to evidence, the camera doesn't lie. Over the years long enforcement here in Seattle has used video cameras in their police cruisers to show proof of a crime or just a document proper procedure. But now city council member Bruce Harrell wants to explore the possibility of placing the / cameras on the officers themselves.

“They believe that this is the way of the future, that, we are in the video technology age. It's a good way to establish a good record on what's happening out there.”

It is a special meeting today at city hall. Two separate companies, Vievu and Taser International, made their speech to demonstrate the latest on-person video camera technologies. The cost, anywhere from 900 up to 1,700 dollars per unit, but not everyone is sold on the idea. “You're talking about millions of dollars of investment in technology. What's the cost benefit analysis in a large organization?” “And you don't have the answer to that yet?” “I do not have the answer to that.”

“I believe last year Seattle probably spent around, 6 million dollars, just handling over 1,400 complaints that were made against the officers. And in studies we've seen both domestically and internationally, we're seeing anywhere between 40 up to 100 percent reduction in complaints.”

Recent incidents here in Seattle have shown that video can be a very powerful tool and that can benefit people, the officer and the citizen.

“What concerns you more is not what we saw. It's the incidents out there that we don't get a chance to see. We wanna know what's happening out there in the city again. If we have the technology, we should use it.”

According to some police departments, body mounted cameras should be the way of the future, documenting everything from the officer's point of view. And the video will not only help convict people, but help cops defend themselves from allegations of rudeness, or even police brutality.
1

评分次数

[Homework]2010-07-15&07-17 警察应该在身上安装摄像机?

what comes to evidence the camara doesn't lie. Over the years' long force over the Seatlle has used the camera in the police   to show proofs of crimes or just document proper procedure. But now, city consell member Bruce Helreal wants to explore the possibality of placing steady cameras on the officers themselves, they belivet that this is the way of the future, that we are in the vidio telconoly age, its a good way to set good records on what's happening out there. So it is then... A special meeting in the city hall, two separate companies view and test international made their page to demonstrate latest on person vidio camera teconology, the cost anywhere from 900 up to 1700 dollars per unit, now not everyone is sold on the idea. You are talking about millions of dollars, once the benifts of analysis and larger organization,  you don't have the answer to that yet. I do not have anwther to that, I believe last year seatllt spent around 6million dollars just handling over the complains that were made againt the officers, and in studies we both nationly and anywhere between 40 up to 100% complains.
Recent evidence here in seattle can show the camera can be a very powful tool that both the officers and the citizens. what convince more is what we saw, is the incedents out there we don't give a chance to see, we want to know what's happening out the city again.If we have the tecenology we should use it. According to sunbullet department,body bounde show be the way of the future, documenting everything from the officers' point of vier, and the vidio  can not only help convine the people and help the cabs defend themselves for elogace to rudness,or even police protiliy. In seattle,  Jone news.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
实现无障碍英语沟通
本帖最后由 尼采的圣经 于 2010-7-16 11:29 编辑

HOMEWORK

When it comes to evidence, the camera doesn't lie. Over the years long, forcement here in Seattle has used vedio camera in their police cruisers to show the proof of the crime of just document proper procedure. But now city council member Bruce Harro wants to exploit the possibility of placing  the ** cameras on the officers themselves.

-I believe this is the way of the future.That we are in a vedio technology age, it's a good way to establish record what's happening out there.

It's a special meeting at the city hall. Two seperate companies, ** and Taser International made their pitch to demonstrate the latest on-person video camera technologies. The cost, anywhere from 900$ to 1,700$ per unit. But not everyone is sold on the idea.

-You are talking about millions of dollars' investment techology, what's the cost benefit analysis in a large organization?
-And you don't have the answer to that yet.
-I do not have the answer to that.

-I belived last year Seattle probably spent 600 million dollars just handling over 1,400 complaints tha would make against the officers. And in studies we've seen both domestically and internationally.We've seen anywhere beween 40 up to a 100 percent of reduction in complaints.

Recently incidents here in Seattle have shown video can be a very powerful tool that can benefit the officer and the citizen.

-What conern you more now as we saw is the incidents out there we don't get the chance we see, we want to know what's happening out there. And say it again, if we have the technology, we should use it.

According to some police departments, body bond camera should be the way of the future. Documenting anything from the officer's point of view. The video will not only help convict people , but to help cops defend themselves from allegation of rudeness or even police brutality.
1

评分次数

正因为你为你的玫瑰花费了时间,这才使你的玫瑰变得如此重要……
普特听力大课堂

[Homework]2010-07-15&07-17 警察应该在身上安装摄像机?

When it comes to the evidence the camera dose not lie, Over years long force but here in Seattle has used video cameras in the plice cruisers to show the proof of the crime or register document proper procedure .But now city council member Bruce wants to explore the possibility of placing statistic art  cameras on the officers themselves.They believe that this is the way of the  future that we are in the video technology age, it's a good way to s  good record on what's everything out there .In a special meeting today at city hall,two separate companies made their page to demonstrate the latest on person video camera technologies that cost anywhere from 9 hundred up to 17 hundred dollars per unit. But not everyone is sold on the idea.We are talking about millions of dollars of investment in technology.What's the benefit analysis in a large organization.
And you do not have the answer to that yet.
I do not have answer to that
I believe vast Seattle policy spend around 6 million dollars just handling over 1400 complaints that were made against officers and in studys we've seen both domestically and internationally were seen anywhere between 40 up to 100 reduction in complaints
Recent incidents here in Seattle show that vedio can be very powerful tool that can benefit both the officer and the citizen.what concerns you more is now we saw is incidents inside it we don't get chance to see. we want to know what's happening out there in the city  again . If we have the technology we should use it according to some place of  p      body cameras should be the way of future documenting everything from the officers' point of view.And video will not only help to convict people but help cops to defend themselves from the allegation ru or even in police retaliatory.
In Seattle Jone for news.



This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
1

评分次数

  • 尼采的圣经

好栏目推荐之美国口语俚语
on lonely pasar

When it comes to evidence, the camera doesn't lie. Over the years , law enforcement here in Seattle has used video camera in their police cruisers to show the proof of the crime of just document proper procedure. But now city council member Bruce Harro wants to exploit the possibility of placing  the state-art cameras on the officers themselves.

-I believe
that this is the way of the future.That we are in a video
technology age, it's a good way to establish good record what's happening out there.

It's a special meeting
today at the city hall. Two separate companies, Viview and Taser International made their pitch to demonstrate the latest on-person video camera technologies. The cost, anywhere from 900$ up
to 1,700$ per unit. But not everyone is sold on the idea.

-You are talking about millions of dollars' investment
technology
, what's the cost benefit analysis in a large organization?
-And you don't have the answer to that yet.
-I do not have the answer to that.

-I
believed last year Seattle probably spent 600 million dollars just handling over 1,400 complaints they’ve made against the officers. And in studies we've seen both domestically and internationally.We've seen anywhere between
40 up to a 100 percent of reduction in complaints.

Recently incidents here in Seattle have shown video can be a very powerful tool that can benefit the officer and the citizen.

-What
concern you more now as we saw is the incidents out there we don't get the chance to
see, we want to know what's happening out there. And say it again, if we have the technology, we should use it.

According to some police departments, body bond camera should be the way of the future. Documenting anything from the officer's point of view. The video will not only help convict people , but to help cops defend themselves from allegation of rudeness or even police brutality.
1

评分次数

HW
What comes to evidence the cameral do not lie. Over the years long, forcement here in Seattle has used video cameral in their police cruisers to show prove of a crime or just a document proper procedure but now city counsel member Bruce Hero wants to explore the possibility of placing the state-art cameras on the officers themselves.  
I believe that this is the way of the future that we are in the video technology age. It is a good way to establish a good record on what’s happening out here.
In a special meeting today in the city hall two separate companies, Viview and Teaser International made their pitch to demonstrate the latest on person video camera technologies. The cast anywhere from 900 up to 1700 dollars per unite but not everyone is sold on the idea.
They are talking about millions of dollars of investment technology. What’s the cost benefit analysis in a large organization?
And you do not have the answer to that yet.
I do not have the answer to that.
I believe last Seattle province spend around 6 million dollars just handling over 14 hundred complains that were made against officers and in studies we have seen both domestically and internationally, we are seeing anywhere between 14 up to 100 present reduction in complains.
Resent incidents in Seattle have shown that video can be a very powerful tool that can benefit both the officer and the citizen.   
What concerns more is now what we saw is the incident out there we don’t get a chance to see we want to know what’s happening out there in the city and again if we have the technology we should use it.
According to some police departments body-mounted-camera should be the way of future documenting every thing from the officer’s point if view. And video not help to convict people, but help cops defend themselves from allegation of rudeness or even police brutality.
1

评分次数

HW
What comes to evidence, the camera doesn't lie. Over the years long for and the force here in Seattle has use the vedio cameras in the police cruises to show proofs of the crime or just the document proper procedure. But now city council member Bruce Carol wants to explore the possibility of placing static art cameras on the officers themselves.
I believe that this is the way of the future that we are in the vedio technology age. That's a good way to set a good record on what's hanging on there.
In this special meeting today in the city hall, two seperate companies, Viveo and Tase International made their pitch to demonstrate the lattest on person vedio camera technologies. The cost? Anyone from 900 up to 1700 dollars per unit. But not everyone is sold on the idea.
You are talking about millions of dollars has been invested on the technology. What's the cost benefit analysis in the large organization?
And you don't have the answer to that yet?
I do not have the answer to that.
I believe last Seattle probably spent around six million dollars just handling over 14,000 complaints. They would made against the officers. And in studies we've seen both the * are actually we'll seen any one between 40 up to 100 per cent reduction in complaints.
Recent incidence here in Seattle has shown that vedio can be a very powerful tool that can benefit both the officer and the citizen.
What concern more now what we saw is the incidence out that we don't have a chance to see. We want to know what's happening out through the city again, if we had the technology we should use it.
According to some police departments, body * cameras should be the way of future, documenting everything from the officer's point of view. In the vedio on that way can help the people, but help the cops defend themselves from allegation of rudeness, or even police brutality.
1

评分次数

每天半小时 轻松提高英语口语

[Homework]2010-07-15&07-17 警察应该在身上安装摄像机?

HW
Should Cops Wear Body Cameras?
When it comes to evidence that cameras doesn't lie,over the years long, folks will hear    in Seattle has used vedio cameras in their police crusus   to show proof of a crime or just to document proper persidure. But now city Coucil member Bruse Caral wants to explore the possibility of placing steady ? cameras  on the officers themselves.
I believe that this is the way of the future that we are in a vedio technology age. It's a good way to solection,a good recognition on  what's happening out there.
In a special meeting today in city hall , two separate  companies Vedio and Tasue International  made their page to demonstrate the latest on-person vedio camera technologies. The cost, anywhere from 900 up to 1700 dollars per unit. But now everyone is sold on the idea.
You are talking about millions of dollars of the investment of  technology.What's the cost benefit the analysis and large oganization?And you don't have the answer to that yet?I do not have the answer to that yet.
I believe last year Seattle police spent around 6 million dollars just haddling over 1,400 complaits that thay were made against the officers.And in studies we've seen  both domestically  and acturally we are seeing anywhere between 14 up to 100 pecentage reduction in complaints. Recent incidences here in Seattle have shown that vedio can be a very powerful tool that can benefit both the officer and the citizen.
What concerns have been more as now we saw is the incidence out there that we don't get a chance to see,we want to know what's happening out of the city. Again,if we have the technology, we should use it.
According to some police departments, body mult ?cameras should be the way of the future, documenting everything from the officers'  point of view.And the vedio will not only help convict people, but help cops defend themselves some aligation  of  rudenes ?or even police petality?.    -in Seattle,John De Ceplo, Commal for News


This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
1

评分次数

[Homework]2010-07-15&07-17 警察应该在身上安装摄像机?

On jackahu
When it comes to evidence that camera doesn't lie. Over the years , law enforcement here in Seattle has used video camera in their police cruisers to show the proof of the crime of just document proper procedure. But now city council member Bruce Harro wants to explore the possibility of placing  the state-of-the-art cameras on the officers themselves.

-They believe that this is the way of the future.That we are in a video
technology age, it's a good way to establish good record what's happening out there.

It's a special meeting today at the city hall. Two separate companies, Viview and Taser International made their pitch to demonstrate the latest on-person video camera technologies. The cost, anywhere from 900$ up
to 1,700$ per unit. But not everyone is sold on the idea.

-You are talking about millions of dollars' investment technology
, what's the cost benefit analysis in a large organization?
-And you don't have the answer to that yet.
-I do not have the answer to that.

-I believed last year Seattle probably spent 600 million dollars just handling over 1,400 complaints they’ve made against the officers. And in studies we've seen both domestically and internationally.We've seen anywhere between
40 up to a 100 percent of reduction in complaints.

Recently incidents here in Seattle have shown video can be a very powerful tool that can benefit the officer and the citizen.

-What concern you more now as we saw is the incidents out there we don't get the chance to
see, we want to know what's happening out there. And say it again, if we have the technology, we should use it.

According to some police departments, body bond camera should be the way of the future. Documenting anything from the officer's point of view. And the video will not only help convict people , but /help cops defend themselves from allegation of rudeness or even police brutality.


This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
1

评分次数

口译专员推荐—>口译训练软件IPTAM口译通
Hw

What comes to evidence the camera doesn't lie, over the years long enforcement here in Seattle, has used video cameras in their police cruisers to show of a proof of a crime or just a document proper procedure, but now city council member Bruce Harrell wants to explore the possibility of placing the state-of-the-art cameras on the officers themselves.

I believe that this is the way of the future, that we are in the video technology age. It's a good way to establish a good record on what's happening out there.

In a special meeting today at city hall, two separate companies, Video and Taser International, made their pitch to demonstrate the latest on-person video camera technologies. The cost anywhere from 900 dollars up to 1,700 dollars per unit. But not everyone is sold on the idea. You're talking about millions of dollars on investment in technology.
What's the cost benefit analysis in a large organization?
And you don't have the answer to that yet?
I do not have the answer to that.
I believe last year Seattle probably spent  around 6 million dollars just handling over 1400 complaints that were made against the officers, and in studies that we've seen both domestically and internationally, we're seeing anywhere between 40 up to 100 percent reduction in complains.

Recent incidents here in Seattle have shown that the video can be very powerful tool that can benefit for the officer and the citizen.

What concerns me more is not what we saw, it's the incidents out there that we don't get a chance to see. We want to know what's happening out there in the city. Again, if we have the technology, we should use it.

According to some police departments, body mounted cameras should be the way of the future documenting everything from the officers' point of view. And the video will not only help convict people, but help cops defend themselves from allegations of rudeness, or even police brutality.
1

评分次数

返回列表