chuck88

神马是on the chip??

橡树1

Homework:

However dangerous the situation, their job is to protect and serve us.
We are dealing with people's safety, people's lives the end of the day, and police offers are expected to do that, and by doing it apparently on the chip will affect the public.
They cost us 11 bilion pounds a year, a bill the government says must be cut,
Punishing is in this way by withdrawing the things that you said in a contract you're going to give to us, and I think it's unfair.
Like most public servants, officers have already seen that pay frozen, but the home secretaries already made it clear, that won't be enough.
I know that some will reject in principle the very idea of reviewing police paying conditions, but I remind them that those savings will save the jobs of police men and women.
Seperate figure released yesterday showing the police overtime payments have almost doubled over the past decade, well it stregthened the government hand with the public, but arguing the case before this report's even out has caused doubt to over resend a pendents,
The review's author, the former royal regulator Tom Winser has been asked to look at not just pay and overtime, but also generous housing and traveler allowances, shift patterns and arrangements for retirement and redundancy. At the moment, police car we laid off, because their cars to service at the crown. Officers insist they're worth the money.
If you're gonna locate in police on a chip, you have to expect the results are maybe not gonna be the same as when you throw money at her.
Police offers aren't allowed to attack, but they can protest and refuse to perform searching duties, with a royal wedding and Olympics on the horizen, and the government determined to cut the budget, consider the battlelines between police and the parliament wellen shuddy drawn.
Vichi Younga, Sky News.

latonars

hw


However danger the situation, their job is to protect and serve us.

"We are dealing with people's safety, people's lives at the end of the day. An police officer is expected to do that, and by doing it we've apparently been on the cheap. We'll affect the public."

They cost us £11bn a year, a bill the government says must be cut.

"Punishing us in this way by withdrawing the things that you said in a contract you are going to give to us, I think it's unfair."

Like most public servants, officers have already seen their pay frozen. But the home secretary has already made it clear that won't be enough.

"I know that some will reject in principle the very idea of reviewing police pay and conditions, but I remind them that those savings will save the jobs of police men and women."

Separate figures released yesterday showing that police overtime payments have almost doubled over the past decade would have strengthened the government's hand with the public. But arguing the case before this report's even out has carved out over its independence.

The review's author, the former rail regulator Tom Winsor, has been asked to look at not just paying overtime, but also generous housing and travel allowances, ship patterns and arrangements for retirement and redundancy. At the moment, police can't be laid off because they are classed as servants of the crown. Officers insist they are worth the money.

"If you are going to look at * placing on the cheap, then you have to expect the resorts are maybe not going to be same as when you throw money at her."

Police officers aren't allowed to strike, but they can protest and refuse to perform certain duties. With the royal wedding and the Olympics on the horizon, and the government determined to cut the budget, consider the battle lines between police and parliament, were then truly drawn.

Rachel Younger, Sky News

sealinli

HW
However dangerous the situation, their job is to protect and serve us.

We are dealing with people's safety, people's lives into the day, and police officers are expected to do that, and by doing it ，We will apparently be on the cheap We will affect the public.
On the cheap  adv. 便宜的，低廉地

They cost us 11 billion pounds a year, a bill the government says must be cut.
Promising is, in this way by withdrawing the things that you said in a contract that you're going to give to us, and I think it's unfair.

Like most public servants, officers have already seen their pay frozen, but the Home Secretary already made it clear, that won't be enough.

I know that some will reject in principle of very idea of reviewing police pay and condition, but I remind them that those savings will save the jobs of police men and women.

Seperate figures released yesterday showing that police overtime payments have almost doubled over the past decade. Well, it strengthened the government's hand with the public. but arguing the case, before this report's even out has caused doubt over its independence.

The review's author, the former rail regulator Tom Winsor has been asked to look at not just pay and overtime, but also generous housing and travel allowances, shift patterns and arrangements for retirement and redundancy. At the moment, police can't be laid off, because they are classed as servants of the crown.

Officers insist they're worth the money.

If you're gonna look at  the police on the cheap, then you have to expect the results. maybe not gonna be the same as when you throw money at it.

Police Officers aren't allowed to strike, but they can protest and refuse to perform certain duties. With the royal wedding and the Olympics on the horizen, and the government determined to cut the budget, consider the battle line between police and the parliament will be ensuingly drawn.

动凡心的尼姑

However dangerous the situation, their job is to protect and serve us.

We are dealing with people's safety, people's lives into the day, and police officers are expected to do that, and by doing it ，We'll apparently be on the cheap We will affect the public.

They cost us 11 billion pounds a year, a bill the government says must be cut.
"Punishing us in this way by withdrawing  the things that you said in a contract that you're going to give to us, and I think it's unfair.

Like most public servants, officers have already seen their pay frozen, but the Home Secretary already made it clear, that won't be enough.

I know that some will reject in principle of very idea of reviewing police pay and condition, but I remind them that those savings will save the jobs of police men and women.

Seperate figures released yesterday showing that police overtime payments have almost doubled over the past decade. Well, it strengthened the government's hand with the public. but arguing the case, before this report's even out has caused doubt over its independence.

The review's author, the former royal regulator Tom Winsor has been asked to look at not just pay and overtime, but also generous housing and travel allowances, shift patterns and arrangements for retirement and redundancy. At the moment, police can't be laid off, because they are classed as servants of the crown.

Officers insist they're worth the money.

If you're gonna look at  the police on the cheap, then you have to expect the results. maybe not gonna be the same as when you throw money at it.

Police Officers aren't allowed to strike, but they can protest and refuse to perform certain duties. With the royal wedding and the Olympics on the horizen, and the government determined to cut the budget, consider the battle line between police and the parliament will be ensuingly drawn.

candytang91

However,dangerous the situation,they jobs is to protect and serve us.

we are dealing with people's safty and people' lives into the day and i'm police of search but not to do that and ,,and,,.By doing it, i would be ,we are apparently on the chape,we'll affect the public.

they costs us that 11 billion ponds a year,and bill of government says must be cut.

punishing us in this way by withdrawing the things that you said in contract to going to give us,and i think is unfair.

like most public servants ,officers have already seen that pay frozen, but the home secretaries would made it clearly that won't be enough.

I know the sum will reject in principle.基本上 of very idea of reviewing police paying conditions, but I remaind that those savings will save the jobs of policemen and women.

several figures released yesteroday showing the police overtime payment almost double over the past decade will strengthen音 the government's hand with the public.With arguing the case before this reports even out,has caused doubt of  independance.

The reviews author,the former rail regulator told * has been asked to had not just pay overtime,but also generous housing and travel allowances,shift patterns and arrangments for retirement **,at the moment,police call me laid off because they are class to servants in **.

officers insist they are worth the money.

if you gonna look at police on the *.then you have to expect the results音Z，maybe that would be the same as when you throw money at it.

police officers aren't allow to strike,but they can protest and refuse to performs certain duties音.with the royal wedding and Olympics on the horizon and the government determined to cut the budget,consider the battle lays between police and the parliment.

melodyfangtasy1

HW

However dangerous the situation, their job is to protect and serve us.

We all deal with people's safety, people's lives into the day. And I'm place of search put to do that. And by doing it, we apparently be on the *. We'll affect the public.

They cost us eleven billion pounds a year, a bill the government says must be cut.

Promising is in this way by withdrawing the things that you said in the contract you're going to give to us. And I think it's unfair.

Like most public servants, officers have already seen their pay frozen. But the Home Secretary's already made it clear that won't be enough.

I know that some will reject in principle the very idea of reviewing police paying conditions. But I remind them that those savings will save the jobs of policemen and women.

Separate figures released yesterday showing that police overtime payments have almost doubled over the past decade. Well it strengthened the government's hand with the public. But arguing the case, before this report's even out has caused doubt over its independence.

The review's author, the former rail regulator Tom Winsor, has been asked to look at not just pay in overtime, but also generous housing and travel allowances, shift patterns and arrangements for retirement and redundancy. At the moment, police can't be laid off, because they're classed as servants of the crown. Officers insist they're worth the money.

If you gonna look at the police on the cheap, then you have to expect the results that  maybe not gonna be the same as when you throw money at it.

Police officers aren't allowed to strike but they can protest and refuse to perform certain duties. With a royal wedding and the Olympics on the horizon and the government determined to cut the budget, consider the battle * between police and Parliament * truly *.

pcdoing

however dangeous  situation,their job is protect their servers.  we are daily   people safely people  life in everyday, police service is to do that and by doing power on the chip, we will affect bull  their cost is one billion pounds  a year,   bill of government  says their cost must be cut. anything use in this way by rejoin thing you set a contract to us.  i think it is unfair,like most public servants ,officers always say their pay  is frozen. but  whole secretary already make it clear that won't be enough.
i know the some will rejecting the principle of the very idea of reviewing police paying conditions .but i remind of  those savings will save jobs of  policeman and women.  serveral figures revealed yestoday showing police overtime payment almost double  over past decades  will  strengthen government hand with public  but arguing the case before the report even out cause doubt over its independence. reviews offer former rare regulator told  has been asked  care not to  pay overtime.but generous housing, travel allownces, shift patterns and arrangement for retirement redundancy . at moment, police can not be laid off,because their class  serves the crown, officers insist they worse their money.if you look at place on chief ,you have to expect a result and it maybe not the same as when you are free a monitor.police officers are't allowed the strike but they can not protest and refuse to perform certain duties. with rolyal wedding and olympics on horizon. government determine to cut  the budget  consindered battlelines  between police and parliament whether should be  withdrawn.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

sparklark

on整理

However dangerous the situation, their job is to protect and serve us.

We are dealing with people's safety, people's lives at the end of the day, and police officers are expected to do that, and by doing it, apparently on the cheap, it will affect the public.

They cost us 11 billion pounds a year, a bill the government says must be cut.

Punishing us in this way by withdrawing the things that you said in a contract you're going to give to us, and I think it's unfair.

Like most public servants, officers have already seen their pay frozen, but the Home Secretary's already made it clear, that won't be enough.

I know that some will reject in principle the very idea of reviewing police paying conditions, but I remind them that those savings will save the jobs of police men and women.

Separate figures released yesterday showing the police overtime payments have almost doubled over the past decade, will have strengthened the government's hand with the public, but arguing the case before this report's even out has cast doubt over its independence.The review's author, the former rail regulator Tom Winser has been asked to look at not just pay and overtime, but also generous housing and travel allowances, shift patterns and arrangements for retirement and redundancy.

At the moment, police can't be laid off, because they are classed as servants of the Crown. Officers insist they're worth the money.

If you're gonna look into policing on the cheap, then you have to expect the results are, maybe not gonna be the same as when you throw money at it.

Police officers aren't allowed to strike, but they can protest and refuse to perform certain duties. With a royal wedding and the Olympics on the horizon, and the government determined to cut the budget, consider the battle lines between police and parliament well and truly drawn.

Rachel Younger, Sky News.

linwang9295

Howerer dangerous is the situation,their job is to protect and serve us.We are dealing with people's safety and people's lives in daily day,and we are so expected to do that.And by doing it,aparently on the shift,we will affect the public.
They cost us 11 billion pouds a year and Bill's government says it must be cut.Publishing is in this way by withdrawing the thing that you said in a contract that you are going to give it to us ,I think it's unfair.
Like most public servants officers have already seen that paying frozen but home secretaries have already made it clear that won't be enough.
I know that some will reject the principle of the very idea of reviewing paying condition.But I remind that those savings will save the jobs of the policemen and women.
Separate figures released yesterday showing that police'overtime payment have almost doubled over the past decade will strength the government's hand with the public. But arguing the case before this report even out have cost a doubt over its independence.
The review's author, the former via-regulator Tom Vensor has been asked to look at not just paying overtime and also jamorize housing and travel allowances,ship patterns and arrangements for retirement redundancy.At the moment,police can't be layed off because of their class service at the crime.
Officers insist that they are worth the money.If you are look into the police on the cheap then you'll have to repect the resultsthat will not be the same as well as the xxxx.
Police officers aren't allowed to strike,but they can protest and refuse to perform certain duties with a road wedding and Olympics on the horrizon,and government determined to cut the budget, consider the battle lines between police and the parliament will entrully drawn.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

Cinkie

However dangerous the situation,their job is to protect and serve us.
We are dealing with people's safety,people's lives in the day,and police officers are expected to do that.And by doing it,apparently on the cheap,we will affect the public.
They cost us 11 billion pounds of a year,a bill with government says it must be cut.
Punishing is in this way by we doing the things you said in the contract that you are going to give to us.And I think it's unfair.
Like most public servants,officers have already seen that pay frozen.But the home secretary already made it clear that won't be enough.
I know that some will reject in principles of every idea of reviewing peace paying conditions.But I remind those savings will save the jobs of police men and women.
Separate figures released yesterday showing the police overtime payments have almost doubled over the past decade will strengthen the goverment's hand with the public.But arguing the case before this report evened out has caused doubt over its dependence.
The review's author,the former rail regulator Tom Winzha has been asked to the cast not just pay and overtime,but also geneous housing and traveling allowances,shift patterns and an arrangement through time retirement and redundancy.At the moment police can't be laid off because they are classed to service the crown.Officers insist that they worth the money.
If you are gonna locate the police on the cheap then you have to expect the results are maybe not would be the same as when you freeze money at it.
Police officers aren't allowed to strike but they can protest and refuse to perform certain duties.With the royal wedding and the Olympics on the horizon and the government determine to cut the budget considered the battlelines between police and parliament well untruly drawn.
Rachel Younger,Sky News.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

Hardy10280

however danger situation their job is to protect and serves us we are dealing with people safty people's live into the day and police office are expected to do that and by doing it apparently on the cheap we will effect the public they cost us 11 billion pound a year a bill the government say must be cut punishing is in this way by withdrawing the thing that you said in contract you are going to give to us i think it is unfair like most public servants office have already seen that pay frozen but home secretary already make clear that will not be enough i know that some will reject in principle the very idea of the reviewing police paying condition but i remind them that those saving will save the jobs of polic man and women separate figures released yesterday showing the police over time payments almost double over the past decade will it strengthen the government hands with the public but arguing the case befort this report even out has cast doubt over its indenpendents the review's author the former rail regulator T has been asked to look at not just pay and overtime but also generous housing and traveler allowance shift patterns and arrangement for retirement and redundancy at the moment the police can not be laied off because they are classed to service at the crown office insist they worth the money if you are going to locate in police on a cheap then you have to expect the result and may be not going to same as when you throw money at her police office are not allowed to strike but they can protest and refuse to perform certain duty with a royal wedding and olympic on the horizon and government determined to cut budget consider the battle lines between police and parliament well untruly drawn         

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!