本帖最后由 jessiyear 于 2011-6-14 16:30 编辑
on priscillajones
A
growing movement of scientists, students, farmers and forward-thinking business
people are all saying “Wait a minute!” In fact, even the economists who
invented the cap and trade system to deal with simpler problems like fertilizer
pollution and sulfur dioxide, they say cap and trade will never work for
climate change.
Here is why I think they’re right.
When it
comes to any kind of financial scam, like subprime mortgages or Bernie Madoff’s
pyramid scheme, the devil is always in the details, and there are a
lot of devils in the details of the cap and trade proposals on the table.
Devil number
one is known as free permits, which is why some people call this system cap and
giveaway. In this scheme, industrial polluters will get the vast
majority of these valuable permits for free. Free! The more they've been
polluting, the more they get. It's like we're thanking them for creating this
problem in the first place.
In Europe, they
tried the cap and giveaway system, the price of permits / bounced around like crazy, energy costs jumped
for consumers, and guess what? Carbon emissions actually went up! The only part
that did work was that the polluters made billions of dollars in extra
profits.
MIT
economists say the same thing would likely happen here in the US. Those
billions come from our pockets. A real solution would put that money to work
stopping climate change. Instead of just giving permits away to polluters, we
could sell them, and use the money to build a clean-energy economy, or give
citizens a dividend to help pay for higher fuel prices when we /
transition to that clean-energy economy, or share it with those most harmed by climate
change. Some people call this paying our ecological debt.
Since we
in
the richest countries released the most carbon for centuries and lived a pretty comfy
lifestyle in
the process, don't we have a responsibility to help those most harmed? It's
like we had a big party, / didn't invite our neighbors and then stuck
them /
with a cleanup
bill.
It's just not cool.
Did you
know that in the next century, because of the changing climate, whole isle
nations could end up underwater? And the UN says / 9 out of 10 African farmers could lose their
ability to grow food. Now wouldn’t a real solution benefit these people
instead of just the polluters?
Devil number
two is called /
offsetting. Offset permits are created when a company supposedly removes or
reduces carbon.
They then get a permit which can be sold to a polluter who wants permission to
emit more carbon. In theory, one activity offsets the other.
The
danger with offsets is / it's very hard to guarantee that the real carbon is
being removed to create the permit, yet these permits are worth real money. This
creates a very dangerous / incentive to create false offsets, to cheat. Now in
some cases cheating isn't the end of the world, but in this case, it is.
And
already, there’s a lot of cheating going on. Like in Indonesia, Sinar Mas
Corporation cut down indigenous forests causing major ecological and
cultural destruction, then they took the wasteland they created and planted palm oil
trees. Guess
what they can get for it? Yep, offset permits. Carbon out? No. Carbon in? You bet.
Companies
can even earn offsets for not anything at all. Like operators of a
polluting factory
can claim they were
planning to expend
200%, but reduced
the plans to expend only 100%. For that meaningless claim, they
get offset permits, permits that they can sell to someone else to make more
pollution. That
is so stupid.
The list of
scams go on and on, and many of the worst ones happen in the so-called Third World where big
business does whatever it wants, to whomever it wants. And with lax
standards and regulations on offsets, they can get permits for just about
anything.
|