lxyalfalfa

HW
One moment in 2006 changed CS life for good. Her mom Tracy was driving when they were hit by a vehicle travelling at 70 mouse per hour in a 30 zone. CS, one was  was left brain damaged and powerlized. The driver of the other car was given a 20 well month jail term, just below the maximum, been served only 6 months. A new law would see those committing similar offences imprisoned for to 5 years.

"I think the sentences will make people think twice. Well, I do believe that if they make examples and give maximum sentences, that  will make difference."

Under current legislation, the causes are limited in their sentencing powers.

"Both found guilty of dangerous driving face a prison sentence of to 2 years, while the other ranges of the scale death by dangerous driving can result in a maximum of 14 years in jail. The idea of the new offenc is to proper the gap."

CS causing serious injury by dangerous driving which are dealt in a majestrates' court whould have a maximum penalty of 6 months in prison, a 5000 ponds fined or both . While in the crown court offendants will face a jail term about to 5 years, an unlimited fine, or both punishments.

The Road Safety Charity B has been calling for a change in the law.
This increased 5 years is a really good stopping in the right direction. It's a better ?to get justice that those victims' need. It also wholefully will act as a bit more?  to say to dangerous drivers "your behaviour is unacceptable and we are going to punish you accordingly".

C is nearly 6 now and she has made remarkable progress. But she is still fed by a troop and needs a ? to breathe.

A longer sentence wouldn't have changed that, but for Tracy, there would at least has been the sense that just  been done. Emma Birchley, Sky news.

徐欣玮

One moment in 2006 changed CS's life for good.Her mum Trancy was driving when they were hit by a vehicle trveling at 70 miles per hour in a 30 zone.C aged one was left brain damaged and paralyzed.The driver of the other car was given a 21-month jail term just below the maximum,be served only 6 months.A new law will see thos commiting similar offenses in prison for up to 5 years.
I think the sentences will make people think twice,but I do believe that if they make examples and give maximum sentences, that's what might make a difference.''
Under current legislation, the courts are limited in their sentencing powers.
Both found guilty of dangerous driving face a prison's sentence of up to 2 years while the other range of scales, death by dangerous driving could result in a maximum of 14 years in jail.The idea of the new offense is to  plant the gap.
Cases are causing serious injury by dangerous driving which are dealt within the magistrate's court will have a maximum penalty of 6 months in prison ,a five thousand pounds fine or both.While in the crown court, defendants will face a jail term of up to 5 years and a limited fine or both punishments.The road safety charity brake has been calling for a change in law.
I think * is a really good stepping in the right diretion,is a better move towards getting justice that those victims need.It also hopefully will act as a bit more of deterrent to say to dangerous drivers ,Your behaviour is unaccepted and we are going to punish you accordingly.
C is nearly 6 now and has made remarkable progress,but she is still fed by a tude and needs a ventilator to breathe.Longer sentence wouldn't have changed that, but for Tracy ,it would at least be the sense of justice have been done.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

littlecase

/HW/

One moment in 2006 changed Carry Woods’s life for good.

Her mum Tracy was driving when they were hit by a vehicle traveling at 70 miles per hour in the 30 zone, Carrey, then aged 1 and was left brain damaged and paralyzed. The driver of another car was given a 21-month jail term just below the maximum but served only 6 months.

A new law would see those committing similar defenses imprisoned up to 5 years.

I think the sentences would make people think twice; but I do believe that if they make examples and give maximum sentences, then that's when it will make a difference.

Under current legislation, the court is limited in their sentencing powers.

Those found guilty and dangerous driving face a prison sentence of up to 2 years. While in the other end, the *death by dangerous driving can result in a maximum of 14 years in jail. The idea of the new defense is to plumb the gap.

Cases causing serious injury by dangerous driving which is dealt within magistrate court would have a maximum penalty of 6 months in prison, and a 5,000 pounds of fine, or both. While in the Crown court, defenders would face jail term of up to 5 years, and unlimited fine or both punishments.

The Road Safety Charity * has been calling for a change in the law.

The increased five years is really a good step in the right direction, It is a better news towards getting the justice those that those victims need. It also hopefully will act a bit more deterrent to say to dangerous drivers: your behavior is unacceptable, and we are going to punish you accordingly.

Carrey is nearly 6 now, until now make remarkable progress. But she is still fed by a tube and need ventilator to breathe.

Good girl. We can hear it. We can hear it. Would you back the ventilator later? Good girl.

A longer sentence won’t change that, but for Tracy, there would at least have been a sense that the justice has been done.

Emma Birchley, Sky news.

甜蜜的向往

HM
One moment in 2006 changed Carey Woods' life for good. Her mom Tracy was driving when they were hit by a vehicle travelling at 70 miles per hour in a 30-zone. Karen, then aged 1, was left brain damaged and paralyzed. The driver in the other car was given a 21 months' jail term, just below the maximum, but served only 6 months. A new law would see those commiting similiar offenses in prison for up to 5 years. "I think the sentences would make people think twice, but I do believe that if they make examples in giving maximum sentences, then that's when it will make a difference." Under current legislation the court is limited in their sentencing powers. Most found guilty of dangerous driving face a prison sentence of up to 2 years, while at the other end of the scale death by dangerous driving could result in a maximum of 14 years in jail. The idea of the new offense is to plug the gap. Cases causing serious injury by dangerous driving, which are dealt within a magistrate's court , will have a maximum penalty of 6 months in prison, a 5,000 pound fine, or both. While in the Crown Court offenders will face a jail term of up to 5 years, an unlimited fine, or both punishments. The Road Safety Charity Break has been calling for a change in the law. You think christian's 5 years is a really good, stepping in the right direction. It's a better move towards getting justice for those victim's need.  It also hopely will relax has a bit more of a deterrence to say to dangerous drivers, your behavior is unacceptable, and we are going to punish you accordingly. Carey's nearly 6 now and she has made remarkably progress. But she's still fed by a tube and needs a  ventilator  to breathe. "Good girl. We can hear it. Are you back on the vence later?" A longer sentence would have changed that. But For Tracy, it would at least have been the sense that justice has been done. Emma Birchley, Sky News.

阮薇

One moment in 2006 changed xx's life for good. Her mom Tracy was driving when they were hitted by a vehicle travelling at 70 miles per hour in a thirty zone. XX stayed ages was brain damaged and paralized, the driver of the other car was given a 21- months jail term just blow the maxim, but served just only 6 months. A new law which says thoese commiting similiar offenses in prison is up to 5 years.

I think the new sentence could let people think twice, but I do believe if they have made the examples and are given the maxim of sentences, that will make difference. under the cover of legislation in the course they limit their sentence powers, both found guilty of dangerous drivers who are sentenced in prison up to 2 years   can result in a maxim of 14 years in jail, the idea of the new offense is  to pluge  the gap. Cases causing serious injuries by dangerous driving which are delt in ? court have a maxim penalty of 6 months in prison and 5000 pounds fine or both. While in a crime court, the defensive will face  a term in jail of  5 years and a limiting fine or both punishments. The rules safety breaker is calling for a changing in a law.

The increase to 5 years is really good, stepping into a right direction  ..just the victims' needs. It was also hopefully that big more...to ..these dangerous drivers. Your behavior is only unacceptable and we gonna punish your accordingly.

XX is nearly 6 years now and she has made remarkable progress, but she is still fed by a chip and needs inventulator to breathe. A longer sentence has changed that, but for Tracy, it would at least be the sense that justy should be done.
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

wlx321

One moment in 2006 changed Carrie S's life for good. Her mom Tracy was driving when they were hit by a vehicle travelling at 70 miles per hour in a thirty zone. Carrie's then aged one was left brain damaged and paralysed. The driver of the other car was given a twenty-one-month jail term just below the maximum, but served only six months. A new law would see those committing similar senctences in prison for up to five years.
I think the sentence is for mind people think twice. But I do believe that if they make examples and give maximum sentences then that's what will make a difference.
Onthe current legislation the courts are limitied in their sentencing powers.
Those found guilty of dangerous driving face a prison's sentence of up to 2 years, while of the other end of the scale death by dangerous driving can result in a maximum of 14 years in jail. The idea of the new offence is to plug the gap.
Cases of causing serious injury by dangerous driving which are dealt within a magistrates' court will have a maximum penalty of 6 months in prison, a 5000-pound fine or both. While in the crown court offendence will face a jail term of up to 5 years and unlimited fine, or both punishments.
The road safety charity * has been calling for a change in the law.
We think the increased 5 years is a really good step in the right direction and is a better move towards getting justice of those victims' need. It also hopefully would act as a bit more deterrent to say it to dangerous drivers 'Your behaviour is unacceptable, and we're gonna to punish you accordingly'.
Carrie is nearly six now and has made remarkable progress, but she's still fed by a tube and needs a ventilator to breathe. A longer sentence wouldn't have changed that, but for Tracy there would at least have been the sense that justice had been done.
Emma Brichley, Sky News

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

1143smj

push,push,push,and...
one moment in 2006 changed carius's life for good .
clawn trey was driving when they were hit by a vehicle traveling at a 70 miles per hour in 17  zone .carius was aged one and left brain damaged and paralysed .the driver of the other  car was given a 21months jails just below the maximum preserved only six months.a new law would see those committing similar offence in prison for out of five years .
i think the sentence will make people think twice ,but i do believe that if they wre made examples and given  maximum sentences .and that's waht will  make the differences.
under the current legslation the courts are limited in their sentencing powers .
both found guilty of dangerous driving face a prison sentence up to 2 years while the other end of the scare-- death by dangerous driving can result a maximum of 14 years in jail.the idea of the new offence is just plump the gap.
crais cause in serious injury by dangerous driving which dealt in a magistracy court will have a maximum  penalty of six months in prison ,a 5000 pound fine or both while in the crown court ,defendant will face a jail term at least 5 years ,unlimited fine or both punishments.
the roads safety  charity breakers have been calling for changing the law.
i think these increased five years is a really good, stepping in the right direction,it's a better move towards getting justice of those victim's needs.it also hopfully will acts as a bit more of deterrent to say to the dangerous drivers that your behaviour is unacceptedable and we are going to punish you accordingly.
caris is nearly six now ,until now she has made remarkable progress.but she is still fed by tube and needsa vantilator to breath.
well ,we can hear it ,we can hear it .will we back on the vantilator ?good girl
a long sentence won't change that but for trecy there  at least has been a sense that the justice had just been done .emma birchley  sky news






This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

Inuyasha1366

One moment in 2006 changed Kare Satewood's life for good.Her mom Chice was driving when they were hit by a veihicle traveling at 70mailes/hour in the thirty zone.Kare stay an age one was left brain damaged and paralyzed.The drive of the other car was given the 21 month just below the maximum,but severd only 6 months.A new law would see those committing similar offences in prison for up to five years.I think the sentences will make people think twice.But I do beleive that if they make examples and give the maximum sentences,that's will make a difference. Under current legislation,the courts are limited in their sentence powers.Both found guilty of dangerous driving face a prison sentence of up to two years.What the other end of the scare death by dangerous driving can resulting in maximum of forteen years in jail.The idea of the new offence is to plug the gap.Cases of causing serious injure by dangerous driving which dealt within the Magistrate Court will have a maximum penalty of 3 month in prison, a 5000 pounds fine, or both.While in the Crown Court the defendence will face jail term of up to 5 years,and an  unlimited fine,or both punishments.The roads safty charity breaks has been calling for a change in the law. These increased five yeaars is really good,stepping in the right direction.It is a better move towards getting justice those victims need.It also hopefully will act as a bit more of a deterrent to say to dangerous drives.Your behaviour is unaccptable and we are going to punish you accordingly.Kare is neraly six now and has made remarkable progress.She is still feed by a chop and needs a ventilator to breath.A longer sentence wouldn't change that,but for Tricy,there would at least been the sense the justice has been done.
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

yishan303

Homework
One moment in 2006 changed Cereys Ediward's life for good. Her mom,Tracy,was driving when they were hit by a vehicle traveling at 70 miles per hour in a 30 zone. Cereys then age one was left brain damaged and paralyzed. The driver,the x care was given a 21 months jail term just below the maximum,but served only 6 months.

A new law would see those committing  similar offences in prisoned for up to 5 years.

I think the sentence says would make people think twice,but I do believe that if they make examples and give maximum sentences that when it will make a difference.

Under a current legislation the court has limited in their sentencing powers.

x found guilty of dangerous driving face a prison sentence for up to 2 years while the other end of the scale death by dangerous driving could result in a maximum of 14 years in jail. The idea of the new offence is to plot the gap.

Cases of causing serious injury by dangerous driving which had dealt with in a magistrate court will have a maximum penalty of 6 months in prison. A 5000-pound fine or both while in the crowd court defenders will face a jail term for up to 5 years and on limited fine or both punishments.

The road's safety charity break has been calling for a changing the law.

This in previous 5 years is a really good, step in the right direction is a better move towards getting just as those victims need. And it also hopelly what I said a big move of deterring to say to dangerous drivers:you behavior is unacceptable and we'll going to punish you xx

Cerys is nearly six now,until she's made a remarkable process but she is still failed by a chip and needs invadilated to breathe.

Good girl,we can hear it.But if we can the ventilator,good girl.

A longer sentence wouldn't have chaged that,but for Tracy it would at least of being a sense that justice had been done.

Emma Berchley


                                                   
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!