只用一本书提高英语听力能力!重温经典名著双语阅读小编推荐:跟着纪录片学英语不背单词和语法,轻松学英语
返回列表 回复 发帖

[访谈录] 2015-02-14&02-17 查尔斯王子传记披露与戴安娜婚姻:我不能和她结婚

提高英语听力能力 找对方法很重要!

[访谈录] 2015-02-14&02-17 查尔斯王子传记披露与戴安娜婚姻:我不能和她结婚

user posted image
 Prince Charles' Camp Calls Claims in Book 'Ill-Informed Speculation'


The prince fights back against a controversial book, "Born to Be King," with a letter published in the Times of London.


user posted image

【电信1】 RealVideo / mp3

【电信2】 RealVideo / mp3

【网通/教育网】 RealVideo / mp3

【迅雷高速下载】 RealVideo / mp3

点击进入访谈录整理稿汇总页面

点击进入多主题版块听写规则(新手必读)


版主提示:
一、若是自己的听写稿, 请发帖时标注'Homework'.
二、若是改稿, 请发帖时标注'on 某某人'并在修改处标红.
三、为了达到最快的下载速度,推荐使用迅雷高速下载本站音频/视频材料.

普特在线文本比较普特在线听音查字普特在线拼写检查普特文本转音频

支持普特英语听力就多多发帖吧!您们的参与是对斑竹工作最大的肯定与支持!如果您觉得还不错,推荐给周围的朋友吧~
Prince Charles fighting back against that new bombshop biography. The question is whether or not he is to be a king, in a very unusual view, the Prince's personal secretary is making a public statement in his defense.

This morning a nearly unprecedented move by clear-outs. Prince Charles's camp is very publicly fighting back against criticism raised in a controversial book born to be king, calling some of the claims such as that he is decided he will be an active monoarch, illing forms of speculation in a letter published in the Times of London.

I think this is an impressive book by Prince Charles's  chief staff shows by issuing his letter the prince is pretty serious about the claims that have been made about him.

The book has ignited a fire storm dropping the bombshop Charles has caught on fit on the eve of wedding to Diana, and nearly bcked out and while he is a proud father, he is also at moments of jealousy toward his two sons.

Prince Charles often doesn't attract the same level of attention as the people around him, his sons and his shining duetch loop really attract, but as the author critical stands on Charles's possible future role as the king of England.
   
That prompted the response from the Prince Camp. Responding to Amir's claim is that his active style may be at odds. With his role to remain neutral like his mother. Prince's chief staff Rice has real highness always prefered not to comment on such matters. But after a half century in public life, few could be better placed to understand necessary and proper limitations on the role.

He knows what it takes to be king. He's done 60 years of prince well, he knows what is expeccted from him, he knows the limitation of the role.  

And the controvercy is about to go across the continental, "Born to be king" will be published in the U.S. on Feburary 17th.

So a lot people taking about this, I know you will all be wondering. Just so you know, the prince's mother *** has been the second on the throne since 1952.
立即获取| 免费注册领取外教体验课一节

[Homework]2015-02-14&02-17 查尔斯王子传记披露与戴安娜婚姻:我不能和她结婚

Prince Charles fighting back against that new bombshop biography. The question is whether or not he is to be a king, in a very unusual view, the Prince's personal secretary is making a public statement in his defense.

This morning a nearly unprecedented move by clear-outs. Prince Charles's camp is very publicly fighting back against criticism raised in a controversial book born to be king, calling some of the claims such as that he is decided he will be an active monoarch, illing forms of speculation in a letter published in the Times of London.

I think this is an impressive book by Prince Charles's  chief staff shows by issuing his letter the prince is pretty serious about the claims that have been made about him.

The book has ignited a fire storm dropping the bombshop Charles has caught on fit on the eve of wedding to Diana, and nearly bcked out and while he is a proud father, he is also at moments of jealousy toward his two sons.

Prince Charles often doesn't attract the same level of attention as the people around him, his sons and his shining duetch loop really attract, but as the author critical stands on Charles's possible future role as the king of England.
   
That prompted the response from the Prince Camp. Responding to Amir's claim is that his active style may be at odds. With his role to remain neutral like his mother. Prince's chief staff Rice has real highness always prefered not to comment on such matters. But after a half century in public life, few could be better placed to understand necessary and proper limitations on the role.

He knows what it takes to be king. He's done 60 years of prince well, he knows what is expeccted from him, he knows the limitation of the role.  

And the controvercy is about to go across the continental, Born to be king will be published in the U.S. on Feburary 17th.

So a lot people taking about this, I know you will all be wondering. Just so you know, the prince's mother *** has been the second on the throne since 1952.
Prince Charles fighting back against that new bombshop biography. The question is whether or not he is to be a king, in a very unusual view, the Prince's personal secretary is making a public statement in his defense.

This morning a nearly unprecedented move by clear-outs. Prince Charles's camp is very publicly fighting back against criticism raised in a controversial book born to be king, calling some of the claims such as that he is decided he will be an active monoarch, illing forms of speculation in a letter published in the Times of London.

I think this is an impressive book by Prince Charles's  chief staff shows by issuing his letter the prince is pretty serious about the claims that have been made about him.

The book has ignited a fire storm dropping the bombshop Charles has caught on fit on the eve of wedding to Diana, and nearly bcked out and while he is a proud father, he is also at moments of jealousy toward his two sons.

Prince Charles often doesn't attract the same level of attention as the people around him, his sons and his shining duetch loop really attract, but as the author critical stands on Charles's possible future role as the king of England.
   
That prompted the response from the Prince Camp. Responding to Amir's claim is that his active style may be at odds. With his role to remain neutral like his mother. Prince's chief staff Rice has real highness always prefered not to comment on such matters. But after a half century in public life, few could be better placed to understand necessary and proper limitations on the role.

He knows what it takes to be king. He's done 60 years of prince well, he knows what is expeccted from him, he knows the limitation of the role.  

And the controvercy is about to go across the continental, Born to be king will be published in the U.S. on Feburary 17th.

So a lot people taking about this, I know you will all be wondering. Just so you know, the prince's mother *** has been the second on the throne since 1952.
Prince Charles fighting back against that new bombshop biography. The question is whether or not he is to be a king, in a very unusual view, the Prince's personal secretary is making a public statement in his defense.

This morning a nearly unprecedented move by clear-outs. Prince Charles's camp is very publicly fighting back against criticism raised in a controversial book born to be king, calling some of the claims such as that he is decided he will be an active monoarch, illing forms of speculation in a letter published in the Times of London.

I think this is an impressive book by Prince Charles's  chief staff shows by issuing his letter the prince is pretty serious about the claims that have been made about him.

The book has ignited a fire storm dropping the bombshop Charles has caught on fit on the eve of wedding to Diana, and nearly bcked out and while he is a proud father, he is also at moments of jealousy toward his two sons.

Prince Charles often doesn't attract the same level of attention as the people around him, his sons and his shining duetch loop really attract, but as the author critical stands on Charles's possible future role as the king of England.
   
That prompted the response from the Prince Camp. Responding to Amir's claim is that his active style may be at odds. With his role to remain neutral like his mother. Prince's chief staff Rice has real highness always prefered not to comment on such matters. But after a half century in public life, few could be better placed to understand necessary and proper limitations on the role.

He knows what it takes to be king. He's done 60 years of prince well, he knows what is expeccted from him, he knows the limitation of the role.  

And the controvercy is about to go across the continental, Born to be king will be published in the U.S. on Feburary 17th.

So a lot people taking about this, I know you will all be wondering. Just so you know, the prince's mother *** has been the second on the throne since 1952.
Prince Charles fighting back against that new bombshell biography. The question is whether or not he is fit to be a king, in a very unusual move the Prince's personal secretary is making a public statement in his defense.

This morning a nearly unprecedented move by clear-outs. Prince Charles's camp is very publicly fighting back against criticism raised in a controversial new book born to be king, calling some of the claims such as that he is decided he will be an active monoarch, illing forms speculation in a letter published in the Times of London.

I think this is unprecedent move by Prince Charles's  chief staff shows by issuing his letter the prince Charles is pretty furious about the claims that have been made about him.

The book has ignited a fire storm dropping the bombshell at Charles said, quote, he don't  eve of wedding to Diana, and nearly backed out and while he is a proud father, he is also at moments of jealousy toward his two sons.

Prince Charles often doesn't attract the same level of attention as the people around him, his sons and his shining ???loop really attract beseech cats,

but as the author of Kate's marries critical stands on Charles's possible future role as the king of England.
   
That prompted the response from the Prince Camp. Responding to Amir's claim is that his active style may be at odds. With his role to remain neutral like his mother. Prince's chief staff Rice has real highness always prefered not to comment on such matters. But after a half century in public life, few could be better placed to understand necessary and proper limitations on the role.

He knows what it takes to be king. He's done 60 years of prince well, he knows what is expeccted from him, he knows the limitation of the role.  

And the controvercy is about to go across the continental, Born to be king will be published in the U.S. on Feburary 17th.

So a lot people taking about this, I know you will all  wondering. Just so you know, the prince's mother Queen Elizabeth Second has been on the throne since 1952

Prince Charles fighting back against that new bombshop biography. The question is whether or not he is to be a king, in a very unusual view, the Prince's personal secretary is making a public statement in his defense.

This morning a nearly unprecedented move by clear-outs. Prince Charles's camp is very publicly fighting back against criticism raised in a controversial book born to be king, calling some of the claims such as that he is decided he will be an active monoarch, illing forms of speculation in a letter published in the Times of London.

I think this is an impressive book by Prince Charles's  chief staff shows by issuing his letter the prince is pretty serious about the claims that have been made about him.

The book has ignited a fire storm dropping the bombshop Charles has caught on fit on the eve of wedding to Diana, and nearly bcked out and while he is a proud father, he is also at moments of jealousy toward his two sons.

Prince Charles often doesn't attract the same level of attention as the people around him, his sons and his shining duetch loop really attract, but as the author critical stands on Charles's possible future role as the king of England.
   
That prompted the response from the Prince Camp. Responding to Amir's claim is that his active style may be at odds. With his role to remain neutral like his mother. Prince's chief staff Rice has real highness always prefered not to comment on such matters. But after a half century in public life, few could be better placed to understand necessary and proper limitations on the role.

He knows what it takes to be king. He's done 60 years of prince well, he knows what is expeccted from him, he knows the limitation of the role.  

And the controvercy is about to go across the continental, Born to be king will be published in the U.S. on Feburary 17th.

So a lot people taking about this, I know you will all be wondering. Just so you know, the prince's mother *** has been the second on the throne since 1952.


This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
实现无障碍英语沟通
HOMEWORK(标蓝处求助高手)


Prince Charles fighting back against that new bombshell biography. The question is whether or not he is fit to be a king. In a very unusual view, the Prince's personal secretary is making a public statement in his defense.

This morning a nearly unprecedented move by Clearance House, Prince Charles's camp very publicly fighting back against criticism raised in a controversial book Born To Be King, calling some of the claims such as that he’s decided he will be an activist monarch, illing forms of speculation in a letter published in the Times of London.

“I think this is an unprecedented move by Prince Charles's chief staff. It hows by issuing this letter that prince is pretty furious about the claims that have been made about him.”

The book has ignited a fire storm dropping the bombshell that Charles has caught feet on the eve of wedding to Diana, and nearly backed out and while he is a proud father, he is also at moments of jealousy toward his two sons.

“Prince Charles often doesn't attract the same level of attention as the people around him. His sons and his shining daughter-in-law will attract X.”

But as the author, Catherine Mayer’s critical stands on Charles's possible future role as the king of England that prompted the response from the prince’s Camp. Responding to Mayer's claim that his active style may be at odds with his role to remain neutral like his mother, Prince's chief staff writes: “His Royal Highness has always preferred not to comment on such matters. But after half a century in public life, few could be better placed to understand the necessary and proper limitations on the role…”

“He knows what it takes to be king. He's done 60 odd years as Prince of Wales, he knows what is expected from him, he knows the limitation of the role.”  

And the controversy is about to go across continental. "Born To Be King" will be published in the U.S. on February 17th.

So a lot people taking about this, and I know, you, we will all be wondering. Just so you know, the prince's mother Queen Elisabeth the second has been on the throne since 1952.
口译专员推荐—>口译训练软件IPTAM口译通
The Princes Charles is fighting back against that a bomb shock biography, the question is whether or not he is fit to be a king. In a very unusual move, the Prince’s personal secretary is making a public statement in his defense.
This morning, in a nearly unpleasant move by * house, Prince Charles’s camp very publicly fighting back against criticism raised in a controversial new book “Born to be king”, Calling some of the claims. Such as that he has decided he will be an activist monarch, ill formed speculation, in a later published “time of London”
I think it is unpleasant move by Prince’s chief staff, shows by issuing this later, the Prince Charles is pretty furious about the claims made about it.
The book has ignited fire storm, dropping the bomb shall that Charles has called * on eve when he is wedding Diana, and nearly back out, and well, he is the * father. He is also at the moment of jealous toward his two sons.
Prince Charles often doesn’t truant the same label of attention as the people around him. His sounds and his shying * will attract his each kids.
But the author * critic stands * possible future role as the king of England. The prompt response from the prince’s camp, responding to * that he is active style may be at odds with this role remain neuter like his mother.
Prince Charles’s chief of staff writes “ His royal highness has always prefers not to comment on such matters, but after a half century public life, few could be better place understand the necessary and proper limitation on the role.
He knows what is taken to be a king, he’s done 60 years as prince well, he know what is the expected of him and know the limitation of the role. And controversy about go across continent, “Born to be king” will be published in USA on Feb, 17th.
So a lot of people talking about this, I know we were wondering, just so you know, the princess’s mother queen Elizabeth II has been on throne since 1952.

[Homework]2015-02-14&02-17 查尔斯王子传记披露与戴安娜婚姻:我不能和她结婚

Happy New Year!Homework:
Prince Charles fighting back against that new bombshell biography that questions whether or not he is fit to be king. In a very unusual move, the Prince's personal secretary is making a public statement in his defense.
This morning, a nearly unprecedented move by Clarence House. Prince Charles's camp very publicly fighting back against criticism raised in a controversal new book, Born to be King, calling some of the claims, such as that he's decided he will be an activist monarch, ill-informed speculation in a letter published in Times London.
-I think this is an unprecedented move by Prince Charles' chief staff. It shows by issuing this letter that Prince Charles is pretty furious about the claims that have been made about him.
The book has ignited a firestorm, dropping the bombshell that Charles had cold feet on the eve of his wedding to Diana. And nearly backed out, and while he's a proud father, he has also a moment of jealousy toward his two sons.
-Prince Charles often doesn't attract the same level of attention as the people around him. His sons and his shining daughter-in-law will attract these huge cats.
But the author Catherine Mayer's critical stands on Charles' possible future role as King of England, that prompted the response from the Prince's camp. Responding to Mayer's claim that his activist style maybe at odds, with his role to remain neutral like his mother.
Prince Charles' chief staff writes, his Royal Highness has always prefered not to comment on such matters, but after half a century in public life, few could be better placed to understand the necessary and proper limitations on the role.
-He knows what it takes to be king. He's done 60 odd years as Prince of Wales. He knows what was expected of he, and he knows the limitations of the role.
And the controversy is about to go across continental. Born to be King will be published in the U.S. on Feburary 17th.
-So a lot of people talking about this, and I know we all are wondering. Just as you know, the Prince's mother, Queen Elizabeth II, has been on the throne since 1952.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
Prince Charles, fighting back against that new bombshell biography that questions whether or not he is fit to be king. In a very unusual move, the prince’s personal secretary is making a public statement in his defense. this morning, a nearly unprecedented move by Clear Charles’ House. Prince Charles’ camp very publicly fighting back against criticism raised in a controversial new book ‘Born to be King’, calling some of the claims such as that he’s decided he will be an activist monarch “ill-informed speculation” in a letter published in the Times of London. I think this is unprecedented move by Prince Charles’ chief staff, it shows by issuing this letter, the Prince Charles is pretty furious about the claim that has been made about him. The book has ignited a firestorm, dropping the bombshell that Charles had cold feet on the eve of his wedding to Diana and nearly backed out. And while he is a proud father, he also has moments of jealousy toward his sons. Prince Charles often doesn’t attract the same level of attentions as the people around him. His sons and his shining daughter in-law will attract these huge cares. But as the author, Katherin Mayer??’s critical stance on Prince Charles’ possible future role of the King of England that prompted the response from the Prince’s camp. Responding to Mayer’s claim that his activist’s style maybe at odds with his role to remain neutral like his mother. Prince Charles’ chief staff writes ”His royal highness has always preferred not to comment on such matters, but after half a century in public life , few can be better placed to understand the necessary and proper limitations on the role”. He knows what it takes to be king. He has done 30 years of prince of Wales, he knows what is expected of him. He knows his limitations of the role. And the controversy is about to go cross-continental. Born to be King will be published in US on Feb, 17th. So a lot of people talking about this Yes I know we and you are wondering. just so you know, the prince’s mother Queen Elizbeth II has been on the throne since 1952.
实现无障碍英语沟通

[Homework]2015-02-14&02-17 查尔斯王子传记披露与戴安娜婚姻:我不能和她结婚

Prince Charles fighting back against that new bomb shock biography.The question is whether he is not fit to be a king.In a very unusual move,the prince's personal secretary has made a public statement in his defense.

This morning a nearly unprecedented move by Clearance's House,Prince Charles's camp very  publicly fighting back against criticism raised in a controversial new book Born to be king,calling some of the claims such as that he is decided he will be activest monarch....form speculation. In the latter published Times of London.


Well I think this is an unprecedented move by Prince Charles's chief staff,it shows by issuing this letter that Prince Charles is pretty furious about the claims that have made about him .That book ignited a fire storm dropping the bomb shock that Charles had cold feet even when his wedding to Diana and nearly backed out.And while he is a proud father,he is also at the moment of jealousy towards his two sons.

  Prince Charles often doubts him to attracts the same level of attention as the people around him.His sons and his shining Dutche Lord will attract these huge cares.


But it is the author Cason Mayon's critical stands on Charles's possible future role as the king of England that prompted the response from the Prince's camp.Responding to Mayon's claims that he is activist style maybe at odds would this role to remain neutrol,like his mother.


Price Charles is cheif of depth,right?His royal hightness has always prefer not to comment on such matters,but after half a century in public life,you could be better place to understand the necessarian and proper limitations on the role.He knows what it takes to be a king,he has done 60 old years as prince as well and he knows what was expected of him and he knows the limitations of the role. And the controversies is about to go cross continental.Born to be king will be published in the US on Feb,17th.So a lot of people are talking about this and we are all wondering just so you know that Prince's mother Queen Elizabeth the second has been on the throne since 1952.


(End)










This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
普特听力大课堂

[Homework]2015-02-14&02-17 查尔斯王子传记披露与戴安娜婚姻:我不能和她结婚

Prince Charles fighting back against that new bombshell biography  that questions whether or not he's  fit to be king. And a very unusual move  the Prince's  personal secretary  is making a public statement  in his defence.
This morning an nearly unprecedented move by clearance house Prince Charles came very publicly fighting back against criticism rated in the controversial new bookBorn to Be King calling some of the claims such as that is decided he will be an activist monarch ill-informed speculation in the later published Times of London.
I think this is an unprecedented move  by Prince Charles' chief staff and shows by issuing this letter the Prince Charles is  pretty in serious about the claims that was made up about him.
The book has invited the firestorm dropping the bombshell of Charles confine on the eve of the wedding with Diana and nearly back-out.And while he's a proud father, he has also a moment jealousy toward his two sons.
The Prince Charles often doesn't attract the same level of attention of the people around him.Sons and his shining don't really attract the** .But the author,Cater Marry's critical stands on Charles' possible future role as the King of England that prompted the response from the Prince's Camp. responding to the claim and active style maybe thus with this role made multual like his mother.
Prince Charles's chief staff write his royal highness always prefer not to comment on such matters. Withouta  half of century of republic life. You couldn't be better placed and understand the necessary and proper limitations on the role.
He knows where takes the King as the 16 years Prince Welsh what's inspected and he knows the limitation of the role.
And the controversy is about to go across continential. Born to be King will be published in the U.S. on February 17th. So lots of people  are talking about this and we will be wondering just as you know Pince's Mother Queen Elisabeth II has been on the throne since 1952.


This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
返回列表