只用一本书提高英语听力能力!重温经典名著双语阅读小编推荐:跟着纪录片学英语不背单词和语法,轻松学英语
返回列表 回复 发帖

[英伦广角] 2015-03-14 英国首相卡梅伦拒绝与工党领袖米利班德辩论 遭嘲讽

提高英语听力能力 找对方法很重要!

[英伦广角] 2015-03-14 英国首相卡梅伦拒绝与工党领袖米利班德辩论 遭嘲讽

user posted image
Labour Plans 'Legal Framework' For TV Debates


Ed Miliband wants election debates to become a statutory right of voters, but the Tories say MPs should get out to talk to people.

user posted image


【电信1】 RealVideo / mp3

【电信2】 RealVideo / mp3

【网通/教育网】 RealVideo / mp3

点击进入英伦广角整理稿汇总页面

点击进入多主题版块听写规则(新手必读)


版主提示:
一、若是自己的听写稿, 请发帖时标注'Homework'.
二、若是改稿, 请发帖时标注'on 某某人'并在修改处标红.
三、为了达到最快的下载速度,推荐使用迅雷高速下载本站音频/视频材料.

普特在线文本比较普特在线听音查字普特在线拼写检查普特文本转音频

支持普特英语听力就多多发帖吧!您们的参与是对斑竹工作最大的肯定与支持!如果您觉得还不错,推荐给周围的朋友吧~

[Homework]2015-03-14 英国首相卡梅伦拒绝与工党领袖米利班德辩论 遭嘲讽

The Labor leader in Scotland today is parties' the toughest battleground, which is why Edward Miliband didn't want the Scotish National on stage and lift to leader debates. But today he formally signed up to the broadcast schedule to put pressure on the Prime Minister. I say today to Cameron today. You can refuse to face the public but you can't deny your record. You can try to chicken out of the debates but don't even again claim to provide strong leadership to the country. Nick Clegg didn't much like the news said the leader former leader, which put the Lipdan on the part with greens and pricomary but he's also agreed the purposals. I think it's a little bit arrogant of the concern that just somehow assume they can, you know, in dictate terms, there are often debates run by the Conservative Party. They belong to the British people. David Cameron was in London today with the friendly audience. But even with all the focus on him, he didn't discuss the issue. He said he do accept he had the debate but in ultimatun he's just breaking the object. And he has been betrayed as the only spendary words. His party blams the broadcasters for scheduling the debate too late. If you are the broadcasters and you come up with a bright idea of a head-to-head debate between the Prime Minister and Miliband, in fact I do believe there should be head-to-head debates. How come you have it on the third of the April when a third of the people have been already voted by post. What were the broadcasters up to? There are only two people who can end up wiht the Prime Miniter: Me or Ed Miliband. But despite this, Mr Cameron's ultimatum on the debates didn't include even a reschedule head-to head with Ed Miliband. From David Cameron's perspective, he and his team's have judged the perception of that in Miliband are so low that there is no upside for them. But if Miliband will period the debates and simply get through the debate without falling off on the stage that will be perceive as a win. So Cameron doesn't think there's any upside for him if he was in empty chair though put him on territory. He risks being labled scared, arrogant and loof. What 's the terrifying someone cause to his car. The other danger is that these debates simply happen without him. Jason Farough, Sky news.                                                   
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
立即获取| 免费注册领取外教体验课一节
HOMEWORK(标蓝处没有听清,求教高手)

The Labor leader in Scotland today, his party’s toughest battleground which is why Ed Miliband didn’t want the Scottish Nationals on stage in this TV debate. But today he formally signed up to the broadcaster’s schedule to put pressure on the Prime Minister.

“I say today with Cameron today: ‘you can refuse to face the public, but you can’t deny your record. You can try to chicken out of the debates, but don’t ever again to provide strong leadership to the country’.”

Nick Clegg didn’t much like the news seven-leader format either, which puts the Lib Dems on apart with Greens and Plaid Cymru, but he’s also agreed the proposals.

“I think it’s a little bit arrogant of the conservatives, just somehow assume that they can sort of, you know dictate terms. These all debates run by the Conservative Party, they belong to the British, to the British People.”

David Cameron was in North London today with a friendly audience. But even with all the focus on him, he didn’t discuss the issue. He said he do a seven-head debate in ultimate he described he’s breaking the logjam. But now he’s being betrayed as the only span on the works. His party blames the broadcasters for scheduling the main debate too late.

“If you are a broadcaster, and you come up with the bright idea of having a head-to-head debate between the Prime Minister and Ed Miliband, and in fact I do believe there should be head-to-head debates, how can you have it on the third of the April when a third of the people are already voted by post? What the broadcasts are up to?”

“There are only two people who can end up as Prime Minister, me or Ed Miliband.”

But despite this, Mr. Cameron’s ultimatum on the debates doesn’t include even a rescheduled head-to-head with Ed Miliband who says he’ll do it anytime.

“From David Cameron’s perspective, he and his team have judged the perceptions of Ed Miliband are so low that there is no upside for them that if Ed Miliband which will period the debates and simply get through the debates without falling over on the stage, that will be perceived as a win. So Cameron doesn't think there's any upside for him if he would be in empty chair, though I wish X completely on X territory.”

He risks being labeled scared, arrogant and aloof. What's the terrifying someone caused to his car. The other danger is that these debates simply happen without him.  

Jason Ferrel, Sky News,
实现无障碍英语沟通
The Labour leader in Scotland today, whose party’s toughest battleground. This is why Ed Milliband didn’t want his Scottish nationals on the stage in his TV debates. But today he formally signed up to the broadcaster’s schedule to put pressure on the prime minister. I set today the Cameron today, you can refuse to face the public, but you can’t deny your record. You can try to chicken out of the debates, but don’t ever again claim to provide strong leadership to the country. Nied Cleck didn’t like much the new 7-leader format either, which puts the Lipdem on the par with greens and Plaid Commery. But he’s also agreed to the proposals. As it’s a little bit of arrogance of conservatives, somehow assume they can sort of, you know, dictator, and this is on the debates, run by conservative party. They belong to the British and to the British people. David Cameron was in north London today with a friendly audience. But even with all focus on him, he didn’t discuss the issue. Good morning. He said he’d do the 7-head debate in an ultimatum he described as breaking a logjam. But now, he is being portrayed as the only spanner in the works. His party, blames the broadcasters for scheduling the main debate too late. If you are the broadcaster, you got the bright idea of having a head-to-head debate between the prime minister and Milliband and if fact, I do believe there should be a head-to-head debate. How can you have on the 3rd of April, when the third of people have already voted by post with more what broadcaster is up to? There is only 2 people who can end up the prime minister, me or Ed Milliband. But despite the Mr. Cameron’s ultimatum on the debates, doesn’t include even a rescheduled head-to-head with Ed Milliband, who’s said he will do it at any time. From David Cameron’s perspective, he and his team have judged perceptions of Ed Milliband of so low. There is no upside for them that if Ed Milliband will appear in the debates and simply get through the debate without falling over on the stage. That will be perceived as a win. So, Cameron doesn’t think there is any upside for him if it would be empty chair though, obviously then it were in complete young child territory. He risks being labeled scared, arrogant, and aloof. What’s a terrifying, someone calls to his car. The other danger is these debates simply happened without him.
口译专员推荐—>口译训练软件IPTAM口译通
The labor leader in Scotland today hit partys in their toughest battleground,which is why Edward Miliband didn't want the Scotland national on-stage and lift to leader debates.

But today he formally singed up to the broadcast schedule to put pressure on the prime Minister. I say today to David Cameron today:"you can refuse to face the public, but you can't deny your record, you can try to chick it out over the debates. But do not ever again claim to provide strong leadership to the country.

Nick Clegg didn't  much like the new 7 leader format either which puts the leader on the par with greens and plight comary, but he's also agreed to proposals.

And it is a little bit of arrogant of the conservative to somehow assume what they can do dictate terms. This is all about the debates run by the Conservative Party. They belong to the British and the British people.

David Cameoron was in North London today with a friendly audience. But even with all the focus on him, he didn't discuss the issue. he said he do accept a head-to-head debate. But in ultimatum he described it breaking the **object. But now he is betrayed as the only spender in the works. His party blamed the broadcasters for scheduling the main debate too late.

If you are a broadcaster, you come to the bright idea of having a head-to-head debate with then Prime Minister and the Miliband. And in fact I do believe they should have attacked the debates. How could you have it on the 3rd of April. when a 3rd of the people have been already voted by post. What the broadcast is up to?

There are only two people who can end up the prime minister. Me or Ed Miliband, but despite this Mr. Cameron's optimistic on the debates, he doesn't include even a reschedule head to head with Ed Miliband who says he will do it at any time.

From David Cameron's perspective, he and his team have judeged the perception of Ed Miliband as so low, that there is no upside for them, the effect Miniband would appear in the debates and simply get through the debates without falling over on the stage. That would be perceived as a win. So Cameron doesn't think there is any upside for him if he was in an empty chair, though obviously that ruined a completely uncharted territory.

He risks being labelled scared, arrogant and aloof. What is terrifying someone calls to his car. The other danger is that these debates simply happen without him.

[Homework]2015-03-14 英国首相卡梅伦拒绝与工党领袖米利班德辩论 遭嘲讽

The Labour leader in Scotland today, whose party's toughest battleground which is why Ed Miliband didn't want the Scottish nationals on the stage in this TV debates. But today he formally signed up to the broadcaster's schedule to put pressure on the Prime Minister.                                                   

I say today with Cameron today, you can refuse to face the public, but you can't deny your record. You can try to chicken out of the debetes, but don't ever again claim to provide strong leadership to the country.


Nick Cleig didn't much like the new 7-leader format ether, which puts the Lib Dems on the part with the Greens and *, but he's also agreed the proposals.


I think it's a little bit arrogant of the Conservatives, just somehow assume they can sort of, you know dictator. These all the debates run by the Conservative party, they belong to the British and to the British people.


David Cameron was in north London today with a friendly audience. But even with all the focus on him, he didn't discuss the issue. He said that he'd do a 7-head debate in an ultimatum he described as breaking the logjam. But now he is being portrayed as the only spanner in the work. His party blames the broadcasters for scheduling the main debate too late.


If you are the broadcaster, as you come up with the bright idea of having a head-to-head debate between the Prime Minister and Ed Miliband. And in fact I do believe that they should be head-to-head debates. How can you have it on the 3rd of the April when the 3rd of people have already voted by post. Well what the broadcasters are up to?


There's only two people who can end up with Prime Minister, me or Ed Miliband.


But despite this, Mr. Cameron's ultimatum on the debates doesn't include even a reschedule head-to-head with Ed Miliband who says he'll do it any time.


From David Cameron's perspective, he and his team have judged the perceptions of Ed Miliband of so low. That there's no upside for them that if Ed Miliband which will appear in the debates and simply get through the debates without falling over on the stage. That will be perceived as a win. So Cameron doesn't think there's any upside for him if it would be empty chair though, obviously then it will in complete in young child territory.


He risks being Labour-scared, arrogant and aloof. What's a terrifying, someone close to his car. The other danger is these debates simply happen without him.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
返回列表