只用一本书提高英语听力能力!重温经典名著双语阅读小编推荐:跟着纪录片学英语不背单词和语法,轻松学英语
返回列表 回复 发帖

[英伦广角] 2015-09-26 英国拟不再为幼龄学生提供免费午餐

提高英语听力能力 找对方法很重要!

[英伦广角] 2015-09-26 英国拟不再为幼龄学生提供免费午餐

user posted image
Free School Meals Could Be Cut By Government


A scheme which gives all infants hot meals at lunchtime is at risk under George Osborne's spending review, Sky News has learned.

user posted image


【电信1】 RealVideo / mp3

【电信2】 RealVideo / mp3

【网通/教育网】 RealVideo / mp3

点击进入英伦广角整理稿汇总页面

点击进入多主题版块听写规则(新手必读)


版主提示:
一、若是自己的听写稿, 请发帖时标注'Homework'.
二、若是改稿, 请发帖时标注'on 某某人'并在修改处标红.
三、为了达到最快的下载速度,推荐使用迅雷高速下载本站音频/视频材料.

普特在线文本比较普特在线听音查字普特在线拼写检查普特文本转音频

支持普特英语听力就多多发帖吧!您们的参与是对斑竹工作最大的肯定与支持!如果您觉得还不错,推荐给周围的朋友吧~
homework---From reception to year 2, all children now get free hot school meals saving their parents 400 pounds a child per year. But skynews understands the skim could for under the chances knife in November spending of year. And head teachers including the one hire in some bit and bottom want to know surance that won't happen. All kinds of ways physically a child is better off and able to concentrate than much more. They are more comfortable in the afternoon, they are more secord. I think we got the system running, we got ...running is this running well. Children are benefiting, please don't take it away form them. The education budget is around 54 billion pounds, forty billion is protected which covers per people spending in primary and secondary schools, fourteen people isn't protected and includes early years teaching training colleges and free school meals. The department has to propose options of 25% and 40% cuts to these areas. As soon as won the value for money, and as well as better use of 800 million pounds a year to pay for free school meals for all children regardless their parental wealth. I'm not convinced that however nice it is, it...with all..currents on. Politically free school meals is seen as a liboral democrat policy something from the collation days that could perhaps be easily discarded by the conservatives as a nick collect folly a bit of liber dam beggigy to get rid of. Where about for this? The conservative manifest of 2015 which pledges to keep the program. All the evidences suggest that children who have a school meal everyday are two month further on their studies and those don't sees damaging to children. It's an insult to our schools. And I guess it's a demonstration of what the labor democracy did achieve when we are in power, these are things you lose when we are not?  Slaberty chefs of ad to cause to keep the program. R.B. told skynews, as a result of the introduction of universal infant free school meals, millions of children who just a year ago were eating sugary,processed packed lunches and now eating a proper nutritious meal. It'll be short-sighted and catastrophic to undo that. And J.O. currently advising the government on child obesity said the vast majority of packed lunches get no one near the nutritional standards set the school meals. It will be a disaster if it were to be taken away. Owner of liang restaurants was commission by the last collation government to come up with the program. And he is also concerned. Before free school meals, you had the less well of children eating school dinners. The..you had the better of children eating a surgery packed lunches. And then you had the working poor in the middle who won't elligable for free school meals. Who won't spend very much on school dinners we haven't bad quality packed lunches. So suddenly all three drewps benefit by eating together everybody benefits. But even with million spend on operating school kitchens, the skims might not be shelled in the chancellors budget furness. J. F. Skynews.
立即获取| 免费注册领取外教体验课一节

[Homework]2015-09-26 英国拟不再为幼龄学生提供免费午餐

From a section year ..., old children now get 3 hot school meals saving 400 pounds a child per year. But Sky News understand, the scheme could fall another chance of knife in a member of spending the view and had teachers including the one hearing speed and botom want an insurance that won't happen. So all kinds of ways, physically, a child is better-off, and able to concentrate than ... more. They're more comfortable in the afternoon. They're more sacaled, ... with gotesses ...We've got it. ... It's really well. Children are benefit, benefiting blease stock ... from it.
The education budget is around 44 billion pounds, 40 billion is protected which covers per pupils spending in primary and secondary schools, 14 billion isn't protected. That includes early year's teaching training, colleges(?) in 3 school meals. But the department has proposed options of 25% and 40% cuts to these areas.
But question is one of value from ....And it's well of best skills(?) of 800 million pounds a year to pay for free school meals for all children, regardless of wealth. I'm not convinced that, however, now it is, is the best ....
These 3 school meals is seen as lebral democrat policies, something from the curraliction days that could perhaps be easily dicharted by the conservetives as a nick ... and ... to get rid of. Worrying about this, they consevetives manifesto of 2015 which pleges to keep the programme.
All the evidence suggests that children will have school every day are too next ... don't. It's damaging to children into insoslot schools and get demonstration of what ... democrat didn't achieve in power. These are things you lose when they're not.
Slavegies sheves added to cause to keep the programes where they blonk to tell Sky News as a result of the introduction of universal infant free school meals, millions of children who just ... a year ago will eating sugary process per lunches and now eating a proper nutritious meal. It will be short-sited and catastrophic to undo that. Jammy Oliver currently advising the government on child obesity said the vast majority of lunches get nowhere nutritional standard set the school meals. it would be a disaster if it were to be taken away. John Vincson, owner of restaurant, whose comission by the last collision government to come up with the program and he also showed concern.
The four free school meals you had to less well of children eating school dinners. The ...economic. You had the better of children eating sugary lunches and that you should have the working pouring the middle who earn for free school meals, who earn spending very much on the school dinners so it hadn't bad quality for lunches. So something all free benefit by eating together, everybody benefits.
But with millions spent on upgrading school kitchens, the scheme might now be shown in the chanceless budget furness.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
实现无障碍英语沟通
Homework

From reception to year 2, all children now get free hot school meals, saving their parents 400 pounds a child per year. But Sky News understands the scheme could for another chances knife in November spending review, and headteachers, including the one here at ****, want an insurance that won't happen. "So all kinds of ways, physically, a child is better off. Unable to concentrate them much more. They are more comfortable in the afternoon, they are more settled. I think we've got the system running, we've got ** running is running well. Children are benefiting. Please don't take it away from them." The education budget is around 54 billion pounds. 40 billion is protected which covers per pupils spending in primary and secondary schools. 14 billion isn't protected. That includes early years teacher training, colleges and free school meals. The department has to propose options of 25% and 40% cuts to these areas. "The question is really one of values for money. And as well as the better use of 800 million pounds a year to pay for free school meals for all children regardless of their parental wealth. I'm not convinced that, however, nice it is, it's better to use the resources as they are currently on."
口译专员推荐—>口译训练软件IPTAM口译通
HOMEWORK(标蓝处求教高手哦)

From reception to year two, all children now get free hot school meals, saving their parents 400 pounds a child per year. But Sky News understands the scheme could fall under the chancellor’s in November spending review. And head teachers, including the one here in St. Bede Bolton want an assurance that won’t happen.

“So all kinds of ways, physically, a child is better off and able to concentrate than much more. They are more comfortable in the afternoon, they are more settled. I think we got the system running. We got it up running and it’s running well. Children are benefiting. Please don't take it away from them.”

The education budget is around 54 billion pounds. 40 billion is protected which covers poor pupils’ spending in primary and secondary schools. 14 billion isn’t protected. That includes early years teacher training, colleges and free school meals. The Department has proposed options of 25% and 40% cuts to these areas.

“But the question really is one of value for money, and whether it’s the best use of 800 million pounds a year to pay for free school meals for all children, regardless of their parental wealth? And I’m not convinced that however nice it is, it’s especially X to the X side."

Politically, free school meal is seen as a Liberal-Democrat policy, something from the coalition days. They could perhaps be easily discarded by the Conservatives as a Nick Clegg folly, a bit of Lib-Dem baggage to get rid of. Where about for this-- the Conservative manifesto of 2015 which pledges to keep the program?

“All the evidence suggests that children who have a school meal everyday are two months further on their studies and those don't. See, it’s damaging to children. It's an insult to our schools. And I guess it's a demonstration of what the Liberal-Democrats did achieve when we are in power. These are things you lose when we are not.”

Celebrity chef X calls to keep the program. Raymond Blanc told the Sky News: “As a result of the introduction of universal infant free school meals, millions of children – who just a year ago eating sugary, processed packed lunches -- are now eating a proper nutritious meal. It would be short-sighted and catastrophic to undo that,” and Jamie Oliver currently advising the government on child obesity said: “The vast majority of packed lunches get nowhere near the nutritional standards set for school meals. It would be a disaster if it were to be taken away.”

John Vincent owner of Leon restaurant was commissioned by the last coalition government to come up with the program, and he’s also concerned.

“Before free school meals, you had the less well of children eating school dinners. The X are economic. You had the better of children eating a sugary packed lunches. And then you had the working poor in the middle who weren't eligible for free school meals. Who weren't spending very much on school dinners and would have bad quality packed lunches. So suddenly all three troupes benefit. By eating together everybody benefits.”

But even with millions spent on upgrading school kitchens, the scheme might now be shelved in the chancellor’s budget furnace.

Jason Farrel, Sky News.

[Homework]2015-09-26 英国拟不再为幼龄学生提供免费午餐

From reception to year two, all children now get free hot school meals, saving their parents 400 pounds a child per year. But Sky News understands the scheme could fall under the chancellor’s knife in November spending review. And head teachers, including the one here in St. Bede Bolton want an assurance that won’t happen.

“So all kinds of ways, physically, a child is better off and able to concentrate than much more. They are more comfortable in the afternoon, they are more settled. I think we got the system running. We got it up running and it’s running well. Children are benefiting. Please don't take it away from them.”

The education budget is around 54 billion pounds. 40 billion is protected which covers poor pupils’ spending in primary and secondary schools. 14 billion isn’t protected. That includes early years teacher training, colleges and free school meals. The Department has proposed options of 25% and 40% cuts to these areas.

“But the question really is one of value for money, and whether it’s the best use of 800 million pounds a year to pay for free school meals for all children, regardless of their parental wealth? And I’m not convinced that however nice it is, it’s best issue also so the current time.

Politically, free school meal is seen as a Liberal-Democrat policy, something from the coalition days. They could perhaps be easily discarded by the Conservatives as a Nick Clegg folly, a bit of Lib-Dem baggage to get rid of. Where about for this-- the Conservative manifesto of 2015 which pledges to keep the program?

“All the evidence suggests that children who have a school meal everyday are two months further on their studies and those don't. See, it’s damaging to children. It's an insult to our schools. And I guess it's a demonstration of what the Liberal-Democrats did achieve when we are in power. These are things you lose when we are not.”

Celebrity chef added quote to keep the program. Raymond Blanc told the Sky News: “As a result of the introduction of universal infant free school meals, millions of children – who just a year ago eating sugary, processed packed lunches -- are now eating a proper nutritious meal. It would be short-sighted and catastrophic to undo that,” and Jamie Oliver currently advising the government on child obesity said: “The vast majority of packed lunches get nowhere near the nutritional standards set for school meals. It would be a disaster if it were to be taken away.”

John Vincent owner of Leon restaurant was commissioned by the last coalition government to come up with the program, and he’s also concerned.

“Before free school meals, you had the less well of children eating school dinners. The rations are economic. You had the better of children eating a sugary packed lunches. And then should have the working poor in the middle who weren't eligible for free school meals. Who weren't spending very much on school dinners and would have bad quality packed lunches. So suddenly all three groupes benefit. By eating together everybody benefits.”

But even with millions spent on upgrading school kitchens, the scheme might now be shelved in the chancellor’s budget furnace.

Jason Farrel, Sky News.
                                                   
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

[Homework]2015-09-26 英国拟不再为幼龄学生提供免费午餐

From reception to year 2, all children nowget free hot school meals saving their parents 400 pounds a child per year. ButSky News understands the skim could for under the chances knife in Novemberspending of year. And the head teachers including the one hire some bit andbottom want to surance that won't happen.

Allkinds of ways physically a child is better off and able to concentrate thanmuch more. They are more comfortable in the afternoon, they are more settled. Ithink we've got the system running, we got ... running is this running well.Children are benefiting, please don't take it away from me.

Theeducation budget is around 54 billion pounds, 40 billions protected with coversper people spending in primary and secondary schools, 14 billion isn'tprotected that includes early years teacher training, colleges and free schoolmeals. The department has to propose options of 25% and 40% cuts to the useareas.

Butthe question is really one value of money, and as well as better use of 800million pounds a year to pay for free school meals for all children regardlesstheir parental wealth, I am not convinced that. However,now it is, it's the best issue also so the current time.


Politically, free school meals is seen as the Liberal Democrat policy. Something from the coalition days that could perhaps being easily discussed by the conservatives as a Nick Clegg folly, a bit of L// baggage to get rid off. Where about for this, the conservatives manifesto of 2015 which pledges to keep the program.


All the evidence suggests that children who have a school meal everyday are two months further on their studies and those don't. See, it's damaging to children, it isn't insult of our schools, and I guess it's a demonstration of what the Liberal Democrat did achieve when we are in power. These are things you lose when we are not.


Celebrity chef // calls to keep the program, R told the sky news. as the result of introduction of universal infant free school meals, millions of children who just a year ago eating sugary, processed packed lunches, and now eating a proper nutritious meal, it would be short sighted and catastrophic to on do that. And J current advising the government on child obesity said the vast majority of packed lunches get nowhere near the nutritional standard set for school meals. It would be a disaster if it were to be taken away.


John W owner of Leon restaurant was commissioned by the last coalition government to come up with the program, and here is also concerned.


Before free school meals, you had the less well of children eating school dinners, the ration are economic, you had the netter of children eating sugary packed lunches, and then should have the working poor in the middle who weren't eligible free school meals, who weren't spending very much on school dinners and would have bad quality packed lunches. So suddenly all three troupes benefit, by eating together everybody benefit.


But even with millions spent on upgrading school kitchens, the scheme might now be shelved in the chancellor's budget furnace.
                                                   
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
实现无障碍英语沟通

[Homework]2015-09-26 英国拟不再为幼龄学生提供免费午餐

From reception to year 2 all children now get free hot school meals, saving their parents 400 pounds a child per year, but Sky news understands the scheme could fall under the chancellor's knife in November's spending review, and head teachers including the one here at St B want assurance that won't happen.For all kinds of ways physically a child is better off, and able to concentrate than much more, they are more comfortable in the afternoon, they are more settled, i mean we've got the system running, we've got it up running and it's running well, children are benifiting, please don't take it away from them.
The education budget is around 54 billion pounds, 40 billion is protected which covers per pupil spending in primary and secondary schools, 14 billion isn't protected, that includes early years teacher training, college and free school meals, the department has to propose options of 25% and 40% cuts to these areas.
The question is really one of value for money, and it's whether the better use of 800 million pounds a year to pay for free school meals for all children regardless of their parental wealth, and i'm not convinced that however nice it is that it is better to be resolved at the current time.
Politically free school meals are seen as a liberal democrat policy, something from the coalition days that could perhaps be easily discarded by the conservatives as a Nick Cleg folly, a bit of Lib Dem baggage to get rid of, well it but for this, the conservative manifesto of 2015 which pledges to keep the program.
All the evidence suggests that children who have a school mean every day are two-month further on their studies than those that don't, it's damaging to children, it's an insult to our schools, and i guess it is a demonstration of what the liberal democrats did achieve when we were in power, these are the things you lose when we are not.
Celebrity chefs have added to calls to keep the program, Remond B told Sky news as a result of the introduction of the universal infant free school meals, millions of children who just a year ago were eating sugary, processed packed lunches are now eating a proper nutritious meal, it would be shortsighted and catastrophic to undo that. and Jimmy O currently adviser in the government on child obesity said the vast majority of packed lunches get nowhere near the nutritional standards set for school meals, it would be a disaster if it were to be taken away. John Vincent owner of L restaurant was commissioned by last coalition government to come up with the program, and he is also concerned.
Before free school meals you have the less well off children eating school dinners, the * you had the better off children eating sugary packed lunches, and then you have the working poor and the middle who weren't eligible for free school meals, who weren't spending very much on school dinners, and we're having bad quality packed lunches, so suddenly all three groups benefit by eating together everybody benefits.
But even with millions spent on upgrading school kitchens, the scheme might now be shelved in the chancellor's budget furnace.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
返回列表