in washington, the Champ Sharpen his warning about the economic concequnces of leaving the Eu. Today, here ranching are much still further.the Teasury report look at the long term effect and on Uk household testing different senorio including Canadian bilateral trade agreement .the write the mewspaper, the economy analysts show that would make the worse to the tune of 45000 pounds that every household in Britain by 2030, our GDP will be over 7 % slower. the out campain treasury team including David Carmeron, great mechanism and is wrong now, some of also creat the chance to use civil servants to build the case remained. this adds to a jumpy diet prediction the IMS christing the god warning the shock of gloabal economy. UCBIS Chroling Febo thinks it wipe 100 billion pounds of our GDP, even the Blarack Obama plans to have a goal when he visits he shore of this week, the treasury report it has already been in dismiss by the blecic campaign as a party against work, which adds as up to unbstantial to conclusion. whatever anybody says, it is subposition.no more net consgecture
This post was generated by put listening repetition system, Check the original dictation thread!
In Washington the Chancellor sharpened his warnings about the economic consequences of leaving the EU, today he'll ratchet them up still further, the treasury report looked at the long term effects of brexit on UK households, testing different scenarios including a Canadian style bilateral trade agreement, George Osborne writes in today's Times newspaper The economic analysis shows that would make us worse off to the tune of 4,300 pounds for every household in Britain by 2030, our GDP would be over 6% smaller.
The out campaign's John R says the treasury team including David Cameron got it wrong over the exchange rate mechanism, and it's wrong now, some have also queried the Chancellor's use of civil servants to build the case for remain. This adds to a drum beat of dire predictions, the IMF's Christine Lagarde warning of a shock to the global economy, the CBI's Carolyn F thinks it'd wipe 100 billion pounds off our GDP, even Barack Obama plans to have a go when he visits the shores this week. The treasury report is already being dismissed by brexit's campaigners as party's guesswork which adds up to unsubstantiated conclusions.
Whatever anybody says it's supposition, no more than that conjecture, call it what you like, but it can not be definitive because no one exactly knows what's going to happen.
The Chancellor clearly views this as a serious intervention by experts in their field, he's also throwing down a challenge to critics to present their own scenarios, rather than simply dismiss his as scare stories.
This post was generated by put listening repetition system, Check the original dictation thread!
IN Washington the Chancellor sharpened his warnings about the economic consequence
of leaving the EU, today he'll ratchet them up still further, the treasury report
looked at the long term effect of brexsit?? on UK households, testing different
scenarios including a canadian style bilateral trade agreement, George Osborne
write in today's Times newspaper the economic analysis shows that would make us
worse off to the tune of 4300 pounds for every household in Britain by 2030, our
GDP would be over 6% smaller.
the out campaign's John Redwood says the treasury team including one David Cameron
got it wrong over the exchange rate mechanism, and it's wrong now, some also have
queried the chancellor use of civil servants to build the case for the remain.
this adds to a drum beat of dire predictionS, the IMF's Christine Lagarde warning
of a shock to the global economy, the CBI's Carolyn Faben thinks it'd wipe 100
billion pounds of our GDP, even Barack Obama plans to have a go when he visits
the shores this week, the treasury report is already being dismissed by brixit??
campaigns as party's un-guess work which adds up to unsubstantiated conclusions.
whatever anybody says it's supposition, no more than conjecture, call it what you
like, but can not be definitive because no one exactly knows what is gonna happen.
the Chancellor clearly views this as serious intervention by experts in their field,
he's also throwing down an challenge to critics to present thie scenarios, rathern
than simply dismiss his as a scare stories.