[英伦广角] 2016-11-19 FIFA罚款处罚英格兰和苏格兰

qingchengshan

England and Scotland face FIFA fines by defying football poppy ban


The Football Association vows to contest any fine imposed after players wear armbands adorned with poppies at Friday's qualifier.

【电信1】 RealVideo / mp3

【电信2】 RealVideo / mp3

【网通/教育网】 RealVideo / mp3

点击进入英伦广角整理稿汇总页面

点击进入多主题版块听写规则(新手必读) 。

版主提示:
一、若是自己的听写稿, 请发帖时标注'Homework'.
二、若是改稿, 请发帖时标注'on 某某人'并在修改处标红.
三、为了达到最快的下载速度,推荐使用迅雷高速下载本站音频/视频材料.

leegc

[Homework]
England’s Prize(an) manager paused to remember ahead of their armistice day match against Scotland again had sparked more debates about poppies and remembrance in the oldest football rivalry. The squad trained for the final time without poppies on their kit, but both teams were wearing them for the match displayed on black armbands in defiance of the FIFA. They could be fined or have points deducted from breaching a rule, bands the display of political symbols on national kit. The FA says that FIFA has got it wrong. And all British Legion hopes to raise 45-million from its poppy-appeal has backed them. I think it’s really important there is given opportunity to choose for themselves. The fact that our football match is happening on Armistice Day itself is so important so to give the players the opportunity to change. I think it’s the right thing to do. I’m very, very grateful for the support they are showing. The poppy is synonymous with remembrance. But the symbol has become sensitive in recent years, for some a compulsory show of patriotism. Fifteen years ago, England played on Nov. 10 and there was no poppy and no protest. Today, public figures, television presenters and football clubs are criticized for not displaying them. This week the BBC faces criticism after it put a poppy on the cookie monster in an attempt to avoid giving offence. The sentence on us will be in the centre of the nation’s two-minute silence, a profound gesture of gratitude and respect to those who lost their lives in conflict. But the debate around football and poppies has raised the question as to whether not wearing one of these amounts to disrespect, and whether remembrance can still be a personal private choice. Author Michael (Morpergel) has written movingly about WWI, most famously in War Horse. He believes that the poppy is personal but profoundly important. What I don’t like about the poppy is the should factor. I don’t think anyone should wear it. I wear it. That’s my business. And the other people wish to wear it, it’s their business.  We are a free country. No should about it. If the team as a whole are decided, English team, the Scottish team, the Welsh team, whatever, to wear poppies, then of course, why not? While England and Scotland defy FIFA, Wales and Northern Ireland will not wear poppies, except their many other ways to honour the fallen. This morning, debate will still by silence.  Paul Kelsas, Sky News.

leegc

England’s Prize(an) manager paused to remember ahead of their armistice day match against Scotland again had sparked more debates about poppies and remembrance in the oldest football rivalry. The squad trained for the final time without poppies on their kit, but both teams were wearing them for the match displayed on black armbands in defiance of the FIFA. They could be fined or have points deducted from breaching a rule, bands the display of political symbols on national kit. The FA says that FIFA has got it wrong. And all British Legion hopes to raise 45-million from its poppy-appeal has backed them. I think it’s really important there is given opportunity to choose for themselves. The fact that our football match is happening on Armistice Day itself is so important so to give the players the opportunity to change. I think it’s the right thing to do. I’m very, very grateful for the support they are showing. The poppy is synonymous with remembrance. But the symbol has become sensitive in recent years, for some a compulsory show of patriotism. Fifteen years ago, England played on Nov. 10 and there was no poppy and no protest. Today, public figures, television presenters and football clubs are criticized for not displaying them. This week the BBC faces criticism after it put a poppy on the cookie monster in an attempt to avoid giving offence. The sentence on us will be in the centre of the nation’s two-minute silence, a profound gesture of gratitude and respect to those who lost their lives in conflict. But the debate around football and poppies has raised the question as to whether not wearing one of these amounts to disrespect, and whether remembrance can still be a personal private choice. Author Michael (Morpergel) has written movingly about WWI, most famously in War Horse. He believes that the poppy is personal but profoundly important. What I don’t like about the poppy is the should factor. I don’t think anyone should wear it. I wear it. That’s my business. And the other people wish to wear it, it’s their business.  We are a free country. No should about it. If the team as a whole are decided, English team, the Scottish team, the Welsh team, whatever, to wear poppies, then of course, why not? While England and Scotland defy FIFA, Wales and Northern Ireland will not wear poppies, except their many other ways to honour the fallen. This morning, debate will still by silence.  Paul Kelsas, Sky News.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

xingxingcamille

England’s players and manager pause to remember ahead of their Armistice Day match against Scotland. Again did this spark more debate about poppies and remembrance in the oldest football rivalry. The squad trained for the final time without puppies on their kit, but both teams will wear them for the match displayed on black armband in defiance of FIFA. They could be fined or have points deductive for breaching a rule that bans the display of political symbols on national kit. The FA says FIFA has got it wrong. And the Royal British Legion hopes to raise 45 million pounds for its appropriate appeal has backed for them.

“I think it’s really important they are given the opportunity to choose for themselves. The fact that that football match is happening on Armistice Day itself is so important. So to give the players the opportunity to choose, I think, is the right thing to do. And we are very, very grateful for the support that they are showing.”

The poppy is synonymous with remembrance, but the symbol has become sensitive in recent years. For some a compose will show patriotism. 50 years ago, England played on November 10th and there was no poppy and no protest. Today public figures, television presenters and football clubs are criticized for not displaying them. This week, the BBC for its criticism after it put a poppy on the Cookie Monster in an attempt to avoid giving offense

The Cenotaph  will be the center of a nation wide two-minute silence, a profound gesture of gratitude and respect to those who lost their lives in conflicts. But the debate on football and poppies has raised a question as to whether not wearing one of these amounts to disrespect and whether remembrance can still be a personal private choice.

Also Michael Morpurgo has written movingly about World War I, most famously in War Horse. He believes the poppy is personal, but profoundly important.

“Well, I don’t like the poppy is a ‘should’ factor. I don’t think anyone should wear it. I wear it. It’s my business. And if other people wish to wear, that’s their business. We are a free country. No ‘should’ about it. If the team as a whole decided -- English team, Scottish team, the Wales team, whatever -- to wear poppies, then of course, why not?”

While England and Scotland defy FIFA, Wales and Northern Ireland will not wear poppies accepting there are many other ways to honor the fallen. This morning debate will be stilled by silence.

Paul Kelso, Sky News.

tribanana

england's player and manager pause to remember ahead of their armistice match against
Scottland, again did this spark more debate about poppies and rememberance in the
oldest football rivalry, the squad train for the final time without poppies on their
kit, but both teams will wear them for the match displayed on the black armband in
defiance of FIFA, they could be fined or have points deductive for breaching a rule
that bans the display of political symbols on national kit. the FA says FIFA has got
it wrong, and all british leigion hopes?? to raise 45 million pounds from its poppy
appeal has backed for them,

"I think it's really important they are giving((??) your opportunity to choose for
themselves, the fact that the football match is happening on armstice day itself,
is so important, so it give the players the opportunity to choose, i think it's
right thing to do, i'm very very grateful for the supporters that they are showing"

the poppy is synonymous for rememberance, but the symbol has become sensitive in recent
years, for some compulsory show of patriotism, fifteen years ago, England played on
November 10. there is no poppy, no protest, today public figures, television
presenter and football club are critisized for not displaying them,

this week BBC for its critisism after it put puppy on the cookie monster in an attempt
to avoid giving offense.

the cenetaph?? will be the center of nationwide two minutes silience, a profound
gesture of gratitude and respect to those lost their lives in conflicts, but the debate
on football and poppies has rised a question as to whether not wearing one of these
amounts to dis-respect and whether rememberance can still be a personal and private
choice.

also Michael Morpurgo has written movingly about world war one, most famously in
world horse, he belive the poppy is personal but profoundly important.

"what we don't like about poppy is 'should' factor, i don't think any one should wear
it, i wear it, it is my business, and if other people wish to wear it, that's their
business, we are a free country, no 'should' about it, if team as a whole are decided
, english team, scottish team, the wales team, whatever, to wear poppies, of course,
why not"

while england and sottland defy FIFA, wales and northern ireland will not wear their
poppies, except there are many other ways to honour the fallen

This morning, debate will be still by silence,

Paul Kelso, Sky news

黄恒1

En gland'sPrize manager paused to remember ahead of ther armistice day match again had sparket more debatesadout poppies and remembrance in the oldest football rivalry. The squad trained for the final tian without poppies on their kit, but both teams were wearing them for the match displayyed on black armbands in defiance of the FIFA.

This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!

luzx86

HW
England players and manager paused to remember ahead of their armistice match against Scotland. The game sparked more debates about the poppies and remembrance in the old football rivalry. This score train for the final time without poppies on their kit, but both teams wear them for the match to display on black bands in defiance on FIFA. They could be fined or have points deductive for breaking a rule of bans of political symbols on national kit. The FA says that FIFA has got it wrong and the Royal British legion chose to raise 45 million pounds to poppy a pill as back for them.
I think it’s really important to give them the opportunity to choose for themselves. The fact is that football matches happening on almost each state itself. It’s so important so to give the players the opportunity to choose. I think it’s the right thing to do. I’m very very grateful for the support they are showing.
The poppy is synonymous with remembrance. And the symbol has become sensitive in resent years, some compulsory show of a patriotism. 15 years ago, England played on November the 10th, and there was no poppy and no protest. Today, public figures, television presenters and football clubs are criticized for not displaying them. This week, the BBC for its criticism after it put a poppy on a poppy monster and attempt to avoid giving an offense.
The silent stuff would be in the center of nation wide 2 minutes silence to profound gesture, of gratitude and respect to those who lost their lives in conflict. But the debate on football on poppies has raised the question is whether not wearing one of these among the disrespect or whether remembrance can still be a personal private choice.
Author Michel Morpurgo has written movingly about WWI, most famous in War Horse he believed that the poppy is personal but profoundly important.
But i don’t like about the poppy should be wore// . I don’t think everyone should wear it. I wear it. That’s my business and if other people wish to wear it. That’s theirs. Because we are in a free country. We should know about it. If the team was owed to decide it. The English team, the Scottish team and Welsh team whatever to wear poppies and of course why not?
While England and Scotland defy FIFA, Wales and Northern Ireland will not wear poppies except there are many other ways to honer the fallen. This morning, debate will be stilled by silence.