只用一本书提高英语听力能力!重温经典名著双语阅读小编推荐:跟着纪录片学英语不背单词和语法,轻松学英语
返回列表 回复 发帖

[影片快递] 【整理】2008-10-19 No End In Sight 一望无际

提高英语听力能力 找对方法很重要!

Homework

A huge ammunition dumps that were guarded until several weeks not a couple of months, after major comebacks, action is it

I was standing there watching the sergents pull out rockets and // and bombs. These weapons cash in Iraq stored and stashed everywhere. And you go to the British or to the US where stare with your little GPS receivers and say: Hey, guys, you know, we found like 1,800 million tons of bombs. And there are a bunch of Iraqis that they keep 47’s taken it away. Probably not the best idea. Here is where it is located in this radio. They just don’t have enough people to cover it. And I just, I couldn’t believe it it wasn’t the right answer.

No End Insight is a new documentary directed by Charles Ferguson, a former political scientist and scholar of Berkinson institution, who turned to documentatory film-making to tell the story about what went wrong in the early days of the American war in Iraq.

That movie is in some way very wide-ranging but also very focused. The basic story has to tell is about what happened right after the invasion in the month in spring and early summer of 2003, when, according to the people interviewed in the film, decisions were made that cast the dice for what was going to happen later.

The plan was, essentially, we will stay for three or four months, we’ll install a government made up of excels and led by Arquinchalidi. And then in August and September of 2003, we’ll begin a drastic reduction of troops.

Larry Derrida addressed us in one forum and said by the end of August of 2003, we would have all but 25,000 and 30,000 troops out of Iraq. I heard him say that, in a room full of people. And I turned to my colleages and I said “This guy doesn’t know what he is talking about. It’s physically impossible.”

He talked to military personnels, to diplomats, to journalists, and administrators. And the story that emerges is a devastating picture of arrogance and incompliance.

Again he is not anti-war activist, sort of lefty seeds of people who went into Iraq to implement the Bush’s administrations’ policies, to try to rebuild the country after the fall of Saddum Hussain, and to find himself ignored, undermined and floored by policies that were coming from Washington. In some way Noah asked a very simple question when this began to be asked, in political circles, in journalism, on top shows questions: who lost Iraq? Who was responsible? for the fact that the war has gone on for four years, more than four years with so much violence. And the movie supplies very specific answers. It names names such as Paul Wolfernis, Donald Brownfield, Alpo Brahma, Dick Chennai, George Bush. Perhaps it’s not surprising all these people declined Charles Ferguson’s offer to be interviewed for his movie. One can only hope one of these days they will get around to watch it.

It laid out several scenarios. It says life could be lousy, life could be OK, life could be better.

The president hasn’t read it. Not even the one-page summary over which we worked so hard, to reduce these findings to a single readable page.

President did not read even the exaggerated summary.

返回列表