只用一本书提高英语听力能力!重温经典名著双语阅读小编推荐:跟着纪录片学英语不背单词和语法,轻松学英语
返回列表 回复 发帖

[英伦广角] 2015-02-28 汇丰银行丑闻事件升级 英下议院将调查

提高英语听力能力 找对方法很重要!
I think for me, the ?letter has been taken off today is the involvement to the banks. the banks weren’t sort of innocent by-standers in this. They were actually aggressive protagonists, so they were not just helping people to avoid and evade paying that tax. they were inviting people on how to avoid and evade paying the tax. And I think the new issue that emerges for me is that we shouldn’t go off, just go off to the individuals. I think Steven Green got really important questions to answer. But I think we should be looking at HSBC as well. I think it undermines our trust in banks. there were other countries that are taking HSBC to court of this. We too should defend our taxpayers and look at whether or not HSBC should be brought to account in the courts.

Why do you think, you describe there. our authority think our pussy ?*&^%$around issue. You can compare and contrast how they are acting in the US. both with individual tax avoidance and corporations that help them do it. I think this is government facing both ways. On the one hand, they know the public are really furious if they find unfairness in the system if you are very rich or if you are big corporation. You can find your way around paying taxes. if you are like the rest of us, you pay PAYE, you just pay your dues automatically. They are facing ? I think you get that with Steven Green. I am astonished today that Siven Green is not answering questions. He was the boss at that time. Either that he knew what was going on, so he was complicit. Or he didn’t know, then he was not on top of his job. Either way, he should be brought to account. he was the boss. He has the question to answer.
(Do) you think you got any chance of getting him in front of your committee? Well, we have got a session interesting enough this Wednesday, already in our diary when we are going to be talking to HRMC and obviously this issue will come up. And I think following on that, if we think that he is relevant that we call to the committee, either the bank or Cizen Stevens and my commission want to do that. We will do it.
And other questions, this is interesting, you talk about HMRC you know as we referred to earlier, in terms of the amount of money recovered and then the actions they take. They seem prepared to do deals don’t they?&^%$#We are not with wealthy individuals but with big companies. either you hold them over the calls#$%^ before or companies like Vodephone or others. They do. I just don’t think it is right. There is a clear law. I think sweetheart deals aren’t right. they argue that it is quick to get the money in if you do a deal and if you litigate. But I think you can say the same about a benefit sgrunture? It is quick to get the money back and why do we treat one group of citizens this one way and another group of citizens the other way. and I do think it is powerful people don’t want to be dragged before the court. People don’t want to be fined. They don’t want to be sent to prison. If you demonstrate, you know, through your cases. You will pursue people through the court. I think probably that is the best to stop people getting involved with this outrageous practices.

个别地方听不出来期待高人的文本
返回列表