只用一本书提高英语听力能力!重温经典名著双语阅读小编推荐:跟着纪录片学英语不背单词和语法,轻松学英语
返回列表 回复 发帖

[英伦广角] 2015-02-28 汇丰银行丑闻事件升级 英下议院将调查

提高英语听力能力 找对方法很重要!

[Homework]2015-02-28 汇丰银行丑闻事件升级 英下议院将调查

I think, for me, the ladders had been taken off today, is the involvement of the banks, we are, the banks were not innocent bystanders in this, they are actually aggressive protagonists, so they were not just helping people to avoid a waping in their tax, they were advising people on how to avoid a waping in tax, and I think a new issue that emergence for me is that we shouldn't go off just go off the individuals, just as i think Steven Green has got really important questions to answer, but i think we should be looking at HSBC as well, i think it undermines are trusting banks, and there are other countries that are taking HSBC to court over this, we too should defend our taxpayers and look at whether or not HSBC shouldn't be brought to account in the courts.And why do you think as you described that odds to our authority, since other are pushing around the issue, I mean comparatively you can trust, how they act in the United States both with individual tax of avoidance and cooperations that help them do it.  I think this is government facing both ways. On the one hand, they know that the public get really furious if they find unfairness in this system if you're very rich of your big cooperation, you can find your way around paying tax;if the lest to pay through PAYE, your just pay your dues automatically,they are facing ,i think you'll get this with Steven Green.I am astonished today that Steven Green is not answering questions. He was the boss at that time, I that he knew what was going on, so he was complicit,although all they didn't know, and then he wasn't on top of his job properly.Either way, he should been brought to account, he was the boss, he has questions to answer. Well, we have got a session interesting to that already in our diary when we are going to be talking to HMRC, and obviously that this should come up,and following on that, if we think it relevant,that we call to the committee, either the bank or Steven Green, and my committee want to do it, we will do it. And another question is interesting. You talked about HMRC, because you refer to it earlier in terms of the mad money they recovered. They seem prepared to do deals, don't they? not with individuals, but with big companies and you've hold over them over the calls before,for deal with companies like voterphone and others.They do and i just don't think it's right.There is a clear law i think sweetheart deals on right.They argue that it's quick to get their money in if you do a deal and if you letigate, you could say the same about the benefit scrounger, it's quicker to get the money back when to take the citizen to court. Why do we treat one group of citizens one way,but the other groups of citizens another way? And i do think it's powerful.People don't like to be dragged before the court;People don't want to be find, they don't want to be sent to prison if you demonstrate through your cases that you will pursue your people through the court.I think it's probably the best way of stopping people getting involved in this outrageous practices.
This post was generated by put listening repetition system,  Check the original dictation thread!
返回列表